IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v101y2022ics096669232200062x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the allocation and use of street space in areas of high people activity

Author

Listed:
  • De Gruyter, Chris
  • Zahraee, Seyed Mojib
  • Young, William

Abstract

The allocation of street space is strongly contested in many cities, particularly in areas where there is a high level of people activity. In these areas, movement and place objectives are often in conflict with one another. The allocation of street space involves a range of governance, political and ethical considerations, yet efforts to reallocate street space should also be informed by empirical evidence of street space allocation and use. This can help to ensure that street space is distributed more equitably to users and support broader goals for increasing the uptake of more sustainable forms of transport. Using a case study of Melbourne's activity centres, this research aimed to understand how much street space is allocated and used by each mode of transport. It also explored factors that are associated with the use of each mode of transport. Multi-modal observational person counts and street measurements were undertaken at 57 different locations within 36 activity centres across Melbourne during 2020. For each site, data related to street and activity centre characteristics were compiled. Key results showed that on average, based on the principle of egalitarianism, pedestrian space in the form of footpaths is significantly undersupplied, while bicycle lanes, car parking and shared general traffic/bus lanes were oversupplied. When viewed across individual sites, considerable variability was found in street space allocation vs. use. Results also showed a number of street/activity centre characteristics that were associated with use of the street space for different modes. Among others, these included footpath width, clearways, movement and place classifications, distance to the Central Business District (CBD), presence of car sharing, car ownership, income and age. The research findings can be used to better inform decision-making on street space reallocation efforts through identifying locations where street space could be allocated more equitably to users.

Suggested Citation

  • De Gruyter, Chris & Zahraee, Seyed Mojib & Young, William, 2022. "Understanding the allocation and use of street space in areas of high people activity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:101:y:2022:i:c:s096669232200062x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096669232200062X
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    2. Felix Creutzig & Aneeque Javaid & Zakia Soomauroo & Steffen Lohrey & Nikola Milojevic-Dupont & Anjali Ramakrishnan & Mahendra Sethi & Lijing Liu & Leila Niamir & Christopher Bren d’Amour & Ulf Weddige, 2020. "Fair street space allocation: ethical principles and empirical insights," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 711-733, November.
    3. Michael Szell, 2018. "Crowdsourced Quantification and Visualization of Urban Mobility Space Inequality," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20.
    4. Szell, Michael, 2018. "Crowdsourced Quantification and Visualization of Urban Mobility Space Inequality," SocArXiv je5r4, Center for Open Science.
    5. Stefan Gössling & Marcel Schröder & Philipp Späth & Tim Freytag, 2016. "Urban Space Distribution and Sustainable Transport," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 659-679, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Palominos & Duncan A Smith, 2023. "Examining the geometry of streets through accessibility: new insights from streetspace allocation analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2203-2219, October.
    2. De Gruyter, Chris & Hooper, Paula & Foster, Sarah, 2023. "Do apartment residents have enough car parking? An empirical assessment of car parking adequacy in Australian cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Daniele La Rosa & Junxiang Li, 2023. "High-Resolution Greening Scenarios for Urban Climate Regulation Based on Physical and Socio-Economical Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas & Hologa, Rafael & Riach, Nils & Freytag, Tim, 2022. "Parking violations as an economic gamble for public space," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 248-257.
    2. Nicolas Palominos & Duncan A Smith, 2023. "Examining the geometry of streets through accessibility: new insights from streetspace allocation analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2203-2219, October.
    3. Sebastian Weise & Alexander Wilson & Geoff Vigar, 2020. "Reflections on Deploying Community-Driven Visualisations for Public Engagement in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 59-70.
    4. Giulia Reggiani & Trivik Verma & Winnie Daamen & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2023. "A multi-city study on structural characteristics of bicycle networks," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2017-2037, October.
    5. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Dake, Dana & Decaminada, Travis & Kotval-K, Zeenat & Qu, Teresa & Wilson, Mark & Pentland, Brian, 2020. "Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-335.
    6. Varvara Nikulina & David Simon & Henrik Ny & Henrikke Baumann, 2019. "Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-37, February.
    7. Montaña Jiménez-Espada & Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Rafael González-Escobar, 2022. "Urban Equity as a Challenge for the Southern Europe Historic Cities: Sustainability-Urban Morphology Interrelation through GIS Tools," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Ajit Singh & Gabriela Christmann, 2020. "Citizen Participation in Digitised Environments in Berlin: Visualising Spatial Knowledge in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 71-83.
    9. Ercüment Aksoy & Nilufer Korkmaz-Yaylagul, 2019. "Assessing Liveable Cities for Older People in an Urban District in Turkey Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 83-95.
    10. Olga Tzanni & Paraskevas Nikolaou & Stella Giannakopoulou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    11. Johannes Wachs & Mih'aly Fazekas & J'anos Kert'esz, 2019. "Corruption Risk in Contracting Markets: A Network Science Perspective," Papers 1909.08664, arXiv.org.
    12. Horn, Julian, 2024. "Walking as an approach to the socially-ecological transformation of inclusive urban mobility systems: An explorative case study involving disabled people in Berlin," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2024-602, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.
    15. Ding, Yu & Lu, Huapu, 2016. "Activity participation as a mediating variable to analyze the effect of land use on travel behavior: A structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-28.
    16. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    17. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    19. Jie Gao & Dick Ettema & Marco Helbich & Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis, 2019. "Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2441-2463, December.
    20. He, Mingwei & He, Chengfeng & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Min, 2022. "Spatiotemporal heterogeneous effects of socio-demographic and built environment on private car usage: An empirical study of Kunming, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:101:y:2022:i:c:s096669232200062x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.