IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v78y2024ics0969698924000377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the moderating effect of social distance on the bonus distribution scheme in online social referrals

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yuhao
  • Shi, Nan
  • Wang, Kanliang

Abstract

Social referrals refer to disseminating business information utilizing the social relationship, as well as encouraging participation by referral bonus. This study introduces the social distance between both referral parties and the certainty or randomness of the referral bonus distribution scheme, as well as conducts a quasi-experimental study on the complete process of social referrals based on prospect theory. The results show that the referral parties are firstly affected by social distance, and the small social distance is conducive to the achievement of social referrals. Social distance moderates the proposers' and responders' behavior. When the social distance is small, both parties of the social referral tend to choose a random bonus distribution scheme, which is consistent with the risk preference behavior predicted by prospect theory. When the social distance is large, both parties of social referrals tend to choose a deterministic bonus distribution scheme, consisting with the risk-averse behavior predicted by prospect theory. As the social distance decreases, friends’ reference point changes from individual profit to collective interest, showing that the risk aversion of personal profit has changed to the risk preference with the basis for ensuring collective interest. The referral bonus distribution scheme has changed from certainty to randomness.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yuhao & Shi, Nan & Wang, Kanliang, 2024. "Study on the moderating effect of social distance on the bonus distribution scheme in online social referrals," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924000377
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924000377
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Vitalie Spinu, 2020. "Searching for the Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 93-112, January.
    3. Verma, Sanjeev & Yadav, Neha, 2021. "Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Word of Mouth (EWOM)," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 111-128.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Haibing Gao & Subodha Kumar & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Huazhong Zhao, 2022. "Socialize More, Pay Less: Randomized Field Experiments on Social Pricing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 935-953, September.
    6. Zhan, Mengmeng & Huang, Minxue & Li, Aoqi & Yang, Yvmeng, 2023. "The role of impulsive behaviour and meta-perception in referral reward programs," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Kim, Namil & Kim, Wonjoon, 2018. "Do your social media lead you to make social deal purchases? Consumer-generated social referrals for sales via social commerce," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 38-48.
    8. Kuang, Di & Ma, Baolong & Wang, Hong, 2022. "The relative impact of advertising and referral reward programs on the post-consumption evaluations in the context of service failure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Qi Wang & Yunxia Mao & Ji Zhu & Xiaohang Zhang, 2018. "Receiver responses to referral reward programs in social networks," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 563-585, September.
    10. Heike M. Wolters & Christian Schulze & Karen Gedenk, 2020. "Referral Reward Size and New Customer Profitability," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1166-1180, November.
    11. Naeem, Muhammad, 2021. "Do social media platforms develop consumer panic buying during the fear of Covid-19 pandemic," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Sara Hanson & Hong Yuan, 2018. "Friends with benefits: social coupons as a strategy to enhance customers’ social empowerment," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 768-787, July.
    13. Ieva, M. & De Canio, F. & Ziliani, C., 2018. "Daily deal shoppers: What drives social couponing?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 299-303.
    14. Liu, Xiaotian & Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T.L., 2023. "The reference price effect of historical price lists in online auctions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kpegli, Yao Thibaut & Corgnet, Brice & Zylbersztejn, Adam, 2023. "All at once! A comprehensive and tractable semi-parametric method to elicit prospect theory components," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Wenhui Zhou & Dongmei Wang & Weixiang Huang & Pengfei Guo, 2021. "To Pool or Not to Pool? The Effect of Loss Aversion on Queue Configurations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4258-4272, November.
    3. González-Jiménez, Víctor, 2024. "Incentive design for reference-dependent preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 493-518.
    4. Zhihua Li & Songfa Zhong, 2023. "Reference Dependence in Intertemporal Preference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 475-490, January.
    5. Kontosakos, Vasileios E. & Hwang, Soosung & Kallinterakis, Vasileios & Pantelous, Athanasios A., 2024. "Long-term dynamic asset allocation under asymmetric risk preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 765-782.
    6. Han Bleichrodt & Olivier L’haridon, 2023. "Prospect theory’s loss aversion is robust to stake size," Post-Print hal-04126663, HAL.
    7. Tao, Zhenmin & Moncada, Jorge Andres & Delarue, Erik, 2023. "Exploring the impact of boundedly rational power plant investment decision-making by applying prospect theory," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Konstantinos Georgalos & Ivan Paya & David Peel, 2023. "Higher order risk attitudes: new model insights and heterogeneity of preferences," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(1), pages 145-192, March.
    9. Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2022. "Chance theory: A separation of riskless and risky utility," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 1-32, August.
    10. Heiko Karle & Dirk Engelmann & Martin Peitz, 2022. "Student performance and loss aversion," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(2), pages 420-456, April.
    11. Xiao Tan & Jianjun Zhu & Tong Wu, 2022. "Dynamic Reference Point-Oriented Consensus Mechanism in Linguistic Distribution Group Decision Making Restricted by Quantum Integration of Information," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 491-528, April.
    12. Konstantinos Georgalos & Nathan Nabil, 2023. "Heuristics Unveiled," Working Papers 400814162, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    13. Buchanan, Joy A., 2020. "My reference point, not yours," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 297-311.
    14. Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernán González, 2023. "You Will not Regret it: On the Practice of Randomized Incentives," Working Papers 2314, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    15. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    16. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    17. Jonathan Meng & Feng Fu, 2020. "Understanding Gambling Behavior and Risk Attitudes Using Cryptocurrency-based Casino Blockchain Data," Papers 2008.05653, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    18. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    19. Boone, Jan & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Ours, Jan C., 2009. "Experiments on unemployment benefit sanctions and job search behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 937-951, November.
    20. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924000377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.