IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v20y1992i4p467-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multicriteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms

Author

Listed:
  • Diakoulaki, D
  • Mavrotas, G
  • Papayannakis, L

Abstract

Multivariate techniques have been widely used for the explanation and prediction of the firm's behaviour. However, in practice, the comparative evaluation and ranking of companies is usually based on the consideration of a single measure of corporate success. But the definition of the most appropriate measure gave rise to a considerable debate. This paper tries to utilise the results of a multicriteria analysis, applied to a large sample of Greek pharmaceutical industries, in order to indicate how suitable some common financial ratios are as indices of the firm's overall performance. The results show that profitability constitutes the most representative measure for the differentiation and ranking of companies. Labour productivity and market share are the best indicators of the business' success, while business' failure is more closely related to ratios indicating long- and short-term solvency. This means that a sound capital structure is a necessary but not a sufficient enough condition to ensure the profitable and effective operation of the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Diakoulaki, D & Mavrotas, G & Papayannakis, L, 1992. "A multicriteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 467-474, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:20:y:1992:i:4:p:467-474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(92)90021-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cliville, Vincent & Berrah, Lamia & Mauris, Gilles, 2007. "Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multi-criteria method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 171-189, January.
    2. Emel, Ahmet Burak & Oral, Muhittin & Reisman, Arnold & Yolalan, Reha, 2003. "A credit scoring approach for the commercial banking sector," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 103-123, June.
    3. Serhiy Zabolotnyy & Mirosław Wasilewski, 2019. "The Concept of Financial Sustainability Measurement: A Case of Food Companies from Northern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Kao, Chiang & Hung, Hsi-Tai, 2007. "Management performance: An empirical study of the manufacturing companies in Taiwan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 152-160, April.
    5. Jingda Ding & Junping Qiu, 2011. "An approach to improve the indicator weights of scientific and technological competitiveness evaluation of Chinese universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 285-297, February.
    6. Zhang, Faming & Tadikamalla, Pandu R. & Shang, Jennifer, 2016. "Corporate credit-risk evaluation system: Integrating explicit and implicit financial performances," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-100.
    7. Dimitras, A. I. & Zanakis, S. H. & Zopounidis, C., 1996. "A survey of business failures with an emphasis on prediction methods and industrial applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 487-513, May.
    8. A. O. Matin & F. Misagh, 2019. "A Modified Mcdm Algorithm With Cumulative Entropy Weights For Selecting The Winner Of The Tender," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, vol. 10(1).
    9. Ioannis Tsolas, 2015. "Firm credit risk evaluation: a series two-stage DEA modeling framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 483-500, October.
    10. Veronika Kajurova & Dagmar Linnertova, 2018. "The Impact of Loose Monetary Policy on the Competitiveness of Czech Firms," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 12(1), pages 43-73.
    11. Berrah, L. & Mauris, G. & Montmain, J., 2008. "Monitoring the improvement of an overall industrial performance based on a Choquet integral aggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 340-351, June.
    12. Michał Piasecki & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2020. "Development of Weighting Scheme for Indoor Air Quality Model Using a Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, June.
    13. Chiang Kao & Hwei-Lan Pao, 2009. "An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 261-277, February.
    14. Psillaki, Maria & Tsolas, Ioannis E. & Margaritis, Dimitris, 2010. "Evaluation of credit risk based on firm performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 873-881, March.
    15. Zopounidis, C., 1999. "Multicriteria decision aid in financial management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 404-415, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:20:y:1992:i:4:p:467-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.