IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v110y2022ics0305048322000251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The information leakage strategies of the supply chain under the block chain technology introduction

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Qiu-xiang
  • Ji, Hui-min
  • Huang, Yi-min

Abstract

Under the block chain technology introduction, a supply chain consisting of a retailer and two competing manufacturers is studied, in which the retailer realizes the vertical information sharing with one manufacturer (the large manufacturer) and always leaks the production information to another manufacturer (the small manufacturer). The small manufacturer has two strategies: passive acceptance strategy and active acceptance strategy. This paper establishes the decision models of supply chain members based on signal transmission theory, and discusses the influence of information leakage and information distortion on the decisions of supply chain members. The analysis shows that there are two equilibrium strategies for the large manufacturer: separation strategy and pooling strategy, and the strategy choice is related to the fluctuation of market demand and the small manufacturer's strategy choice. The retailer chooses information distortion strategy under high market demand, which reduces the profit of the small manufacturer and maximizes the profits of the retailer and the large manufacturer. In terms of the small manufacturer, an active acceptance strategy is more advantageous. In the end, the research conclusion is verified by numerical simulation, and it is found that the introduction of block chain technology has little influence on the manufacturers’ production decisions, and the large manufacturer' production increases in response to the increasing dependence of the small manufacturer's production decision on the large manufacturer's decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Qiu-xiang & Ji, Hui-min & Huang, Yi-min, 2022. "The information leakage strategies of the supply chain under the block chain technology introduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:110:y:2022:i:c:s0305048322000251
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048322000251
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2021. "Incentive of retailer information sharing on manufacturer volume flexibility choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Sundarakani, Balan & Ajaykumar, Aneesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2021. "Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Yiwei Chen & Özalp Özer, 2019. "Supply Chain Contracts That Prevent Information Leakage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(12), pages 5619-5650, December.
    4. Moon, Ilkyeong & Dey, Kartick & Saha, Subrata, 2018. "Strategic inventory: Manufacturer vs. retailer investment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 63-82.
    5. Sun, Xiaojie & Tang, Wansheng & Chen, Jing & Li, Sa & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2019. "Manufacturer encroachment with production cost reduction under asymmetric information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 191-211.
    6. He Huang & Qiuling Meng & Hongyan Xu & Yu Zhou, 2019. "Cost information sharing under competition in remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(21), pages 6579-6592, November.
    7. Zhang, Qiao & Tang, Wansheng & Zaccour, Georges & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2019. "Should a manufacturer give up pricing power in a vertical information-sharing channel?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 910-928.
    8. Cuihong Li & Zhixi Wan, 2017. "Supplier Competition and Cost Improvement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2460-2477, August.
    9. Liu, Hao & Jiang, Wei & Feng, Gengzhong & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2020. "Information leakage and supply chain contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Guangwen Kong & Sampath Rajagopalan & Hao Zhang, 2013. "Revenue Sharing and Information Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 556-572, November.
    11. Morkunas, Vida J. & Paschen, Jeannette & Boon, Edward, 2019. "How blockchain technologies impact your business model," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 295-306.
    12. Lode Li, 2002. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1196-1212, September.
    13. William P. Rogerson, 2003. "Simple Menus of Contracts in Cost-Based Procurement and Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 919-926, June.
    14. Lena Aggestam, 2016. "Knowledge Leakage when SMEs Participate in Supply Chains: What Is It About and How Can It Occur?," International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 30-45, July.
    15. Chen, Wenbo, 2018. "Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharingAuthor-Name: Yang, Huixiao," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-191.
    16. Krishnan S. Anand & Manu Goyal, 2009. "Strategic Information Management Under Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 438-452, March.
    17. Qin, Xuelian & Liu, Zhixue & Tian, Lin, 2020. "The strategic analysis of logistics service sharing in an e-commerce platform," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Huang, Song & Guan, Xu & Xiao, Binqing, 2018. "Incentive provision for demand information acquisition in a dual-channel supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 42-58.
    19. Leon Yang Chu & David E.M. Sappington, 2009. "Implementing high‐powered contracts to motivate intertemporal effort supply," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(2), pages 296-316, June.
    20. Kim Hua Tan & W. P. Wong & Leanne Chung, 2016. "Information and Knowledge Leakage in Supply Chain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 621-638, June.
    21. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2015. "The value of VMI beyond information sharing in a single supplier multiple retailers supply chain under a non-stationary (Rn, Sn) policy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 59-70.
    22. Yao, Dong-Qing & Yue, Xiaohang & Liu, John, 2008. "Vertical cost information sharing in a supply chain with value-adding retailers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 838-851, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Da & Zhang, Yuexiao & Lou, Wandong & Zang, Wenke, 2023. "Fractal viewpoint in supply chain price competition," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Zhu, Shichao & Li, Jian & Wang, Shouyang & Xia, Yusen & Wang, Yajing, 2023. "The role of blockchain technology in the dual-channel supply chain dominated by a brand owner," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Xu, Hongyan & Liu, Xiaomin & Huang, He, 2023. "Information sharing and order allocation rule in dual-sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Chen, Xiangfeng & Gong, Yu, 2023. "The impacts of blockchain adoption on a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse members," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Yong Ma & Chunyu Li, 2023. "Optimal Strategies of Customization and Information Sharing in the Presence of Feature Creep," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    6. Fu, Ke & Wang, Ce & Xu, Jiayan, 2022. "The impact of trade credit on information sharing in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Zhao, Qingli & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Sun, Minghe, 2024. "Manufacturer blockchain technology adoption strategies for different sales channels in an e-commerce platform supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Patanjal Kumar & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yigit Kazancoglu & Ali Emrouznejad, 2023. "A decision framework for incorporating the coordination and behavioural issues in sustainable supply chains in digital economy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 721-749, July.
    9. Zhang, Qing & Jiang, Xiuqi & Zheng, Yini, 2023. "Blockchain adoption and gray markets in a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Yun & Hao Liu & Yi Li & Kin Keung Lai, 2023. "Contract design under asymmetric demand information for sustainable supply chain practices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1429-1459, May.
    2. Wu, Junjian & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2019. "Multi-sourcing and information sharing under competition and supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 658-671.
    3. Wu, Jiang & Zou, Liuxin & Gong, Yeming & Chen, Mingyang, 2021. "The anti-collusion dilemma: Information sharing of the supply chain under buyback contracts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Shi, Chun-lai & Geng, Wei, 2021. "To introduce a store brand or not: Roles of market information in supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Zhang, Qiao & Wang, Kai & Feng, Lin & Dai, Rui, 2023. "For better or worse: Impacts of information leakage by a common supplier with innovation imitation of downstream firms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Zheng, Hong & Li, Guo & Guan, Xu & Sethi, Suresh & Li, Yu, 2021. "Downstream information sharing and sales channel selection in a platform economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Zhiyuan Wang & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & Wei Jiang & Shaojie Tang, 2021. "Blockchain‐Enabled Data Sharing in Supply Chains: Model, Operationalization, and Tutorial," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 1965-1985, July.
    8. Junjian Wu & Henry Xu, 2021. "Information Leakage and Financing Decisions in a Supply Chain with Corporate Social Responsibility and Supply Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Dai, Zhipeng, 2022. "Check Only Once? Health Information Exchange between Competing Private Hospitals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Leon Yang Chu & Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2017. "Strategic Communication for Capacity Alignment with Pricing in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4366-4377, December.
    11. Zhang, Li-Hao & Zhang, Cheng, 2022. "Manufacturer encroachment with capital-constrained competitive retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 1067-1083.
    12. Zhang, Chu & Liu, Bin & Cai, Gangshu George & Huang, Tao, 2023. "When ignorance is bliss: The retailer’s intelligence hazard under information sharing and exchanging," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Zhongyuan Hao & Li Jiang & Wenli Wang, 2018. "Impacts of sequential acquisition, market competition mode, and confidentiality on information flow," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(2), pages 135-159, March.
    14. Yong Zha & Quan Li & Tingliang Huang & Yugang Yu, 2023. "Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 659-678, July.
    15. Junjian Wu & Jennifer Shang, 2021. "Optimal Green Operation and Information Leakage Decisions under Government Subsidy and Supply Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Xing, Wei & Li, Qiankun & Zhao, Xuan & Li, Jialu, 2020. "Information sale and contract selection under downstream competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Xiaoyan Liu & William Schmidt, 2022. "Operational Distortion: Compound Effects of Short-Termism and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5907-5923, August.
    18. Zhang, Qiao & Tang, Wansheng & Zaccour, Georges & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2019. "Should a manufacturer give up pricing power in a vertical information-sharing channel?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 910-928.
    19. Huang, Song & Zhang, Xianmei & Chen, Shuting, 2021. "Information acquisition with advertising threshold effect under manufacturer encroachment in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    20. Yan, Yingchen & Zhao, Qiuhong & Qin, Zhongfeng & Lev, Benjamin, 2022. "Inter-competitor outsourcing: On the advantages of profit and product launching time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:110:y:2022:i:c:s0305048322000251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.