IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobuve/v10y2018ic5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are we missing the platforms for the crowd? Comparing investment drivers across multiple crowdfunding platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Dushnitsky, Gary
  • Fitza, Markus A.

Abstract

Crowdfunding platforms have attracted the attention of practitioners and scholars alike. The term ‘crowdfunding’, first coined in the early 2000s, describes a new institutional form in the financial markets which utilizes digital platforms to originate and aggregate funding. There is abundant research on the topic. Yet extant work mainly consists of single-platform studies. We argue that observing patterns on one platform does not necessarily advance our understanding of other platforms. Specifically, we use data from eight major crowdfunding platforms to conduct a variance decomposition analysis of funding success. The findings suggest factors associated with success in a given platform do not replicate to the other platforms. It underscores the generalizability challenge facing the crowdfunding literature. We therefore highlight the need to complement single-platform studies with cross-platform studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dushnitsky, Gary & Fitza, Markus A., 2018. "Are we missing the platforms for the crowd? Comparing investment drivers across multiple crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:10:y:2018:i:c:5
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673418300921
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anton Miglo, 2020. "Crowdfunding in a Competitive Environment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Guillaume Andrieu & Benjamin Le Pendeven & Gaël Leboeuf, 2021. "Equity Crowdfunding Success for Female Entrepreneurs: French Evidence," Post-Print hal-03227572, HAL.
    3. Dmitry Sharapov & Paul Kattuman & Diego Rodriguez & F. Javier Velazquez, 2021. "Using the SHAPLEY value approach to variance decomposition in strategy research: Diversification, internationalization, and corporate group effects on affiliate profitability," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 608-623, March.
    4. Goran Calic & Moren Lévesque & Anton Shevchenko, 2024. "On why women-owned businesses take more time to secure microloans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 917-938, October.
    5. Maurer, Joshua D. & Creek, Steven A. & Bendickson, Joshua S. & McDowell, William C. & Mahto, Raj V., 2022. "The three pillars’ impact on entrepreneurial activity and funding: A country-level examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 808-818.
    6. Francesca Di Pietro & Francesca Masciarelli, 2022. "The Effect of Local Religiosity on Financing Cross-Regional Entrepreneurial Projects Via Crowdfunding (Local Religiosity and Crowdfinancing)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 429-443, June.
    7. Maria Figueroa-Armijos & John P. Berns, 2022. "Vulnerable Populations and Individual Social Responsibility in Prosocial Crowdfunding: Does the Framing Matter for Female and Rural Entrepreneurs?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 377-394, May.
    8. Lin, Tse-Chun & Pursiainen, Vesa, 2022. "Regional social capital and moral hazard in crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    9. Francesca Pietro, 2021. "The rationale for listing on equity crowdfunding: actual and expected benefits for companies," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(4), pages 527-549, December.
    10. Testa, Stefania & Nielsen, Kristian Roed & Bogers, Marcel & Cincotti, Silvano, 2019. "The role of crowdfunding in moving towards a sustainable society," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 66-73.
    11. Guillaume Andrieu & Benjamin Le pendeven & Gaël Leboeuf, 2021. "Equity Crowdfunding Success for Female Entrepreneurs: French Evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 417-431.
    12. Cumming, Douglas J. & Johan, Sofia Atiqah & Reardon, Robert S., 2021. "Governance and success in U.S. equity crowdfunding," CFS Working Paper Series 668, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    13. Gary Dushnitsky & Evila Piva & Cristina Rossi‐Lamastra, 2022. "Investigating the mix of strategic choices and performance of transaction platforms: Evidence from the crowdfunding setting," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 563-598, March.
    14. Chan, C.S. Richard & Parhankangas, Annaleena & Sahaym, Arvin & Oo, Pyayt, 2020. "Bellwether and the herd? Unpacking the u-shaped relationship between prior funding and subsequent contributions in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    15. Seigner, Benedikt David Christian & Milanov, Hana, 2023. "Mirror, mirror—A gendered lens on female entrepreneurs’ facial attractiveness in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    16. Zaggl, Michael A. & Block, Joern, 2019. "Do small funding amounts lead to reverse herding? A field experiment in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    17. Klepsch, Markus, 2023. "Do birds of a feather always flock together? A multidimensional examination of homophily in crowdfunding," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(1), pages 237-269.
    18. Oo, Pyayt P. & Creek, Steven A. & Sheppard, Leah D., 2022. "Perceived warmth and competence in crowdfunding: Which matters more and for whom?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    19. Nishant Chadha & Viswanath Pingali & Daniel Sokol, 2023. "Small Businesses and Digital Platforms," IIMA Working Papers WP 2023-09-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:10:y:2018:i:c:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing-insights .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.