IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v65y1996i3p220-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Judgment Research Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Wallsten, Thomas S.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wallsten, Thomas S., 1996. "An Analysis of Judgment Research Analyses," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 220-226, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:65:y:1996:i:3:p:220-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(96)90022-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wallsten, Thomas S. & Gu, Hongbin, 2003. "Distinguishing choice and subjective probability estimation processes: Implications for theories of judgment and for cross-cultural comparisons," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 111-123, January.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:8:p:857-869 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Brenner, Lyle A., 2003. "A random support model of the calibration of subjective probabilities," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 87-110, January.
    4. Dorota Skała, 2008. "Overconfidence in Psychology and Finance – an Interdisciplinary Literature Review," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 39(4), pages 33-50.
    5. David V. Budescu & Timothy R. Johnson, 2011. "A model-based approach for the analysis of the calibration of probability judgments," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(8), pages 857-869, December.
    6. Sprenger, Amber & Dougherty, Michael R., 2006. "Differences between probability and frequency judgments: The role of individual differences in working memory capacity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 202-211, March.
    7. Alisa Frik & Alexia Gaudeul, 2016. "Privacy protection, risk attitudes, and the need for control: An experimental study," CEEL Working Papers 1601, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    8. Yates, J. Frank & Lee, Ju-Whei & Bush, Julie G G., 1997. "General Knowledge Overconfidence: Cross-National Variations, Response Style, and "Reality"," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 87-94, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:65:y:1996:i:3:p:220-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.