IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v122y2013i2p222-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying sampling theories to attitude learning in a virtual school class environment

Author

Listed:
  • Fiedler, Klaus
  • Wöllert, Franz
  • Tauber, Benjamin
  • Hess, Philipp

Abstract

According to sampling theories of attitude formation, evaluative learning depends on the sampling in the environment. We investigated teachers’ student evaluations in a simulated school class. Two experiments were designed to test distinct implications of experience-sampling models. While the model advanced by Fazio, Eiser, and Shook (2004) and Denrell (2005) led to the prediction of a negativity effect through asymmetric depolarization, another model (Fiedler, 1996) suggested a positivity effect through asymmetric polarization. Findings supported the latter contention. The selective tendency to oversample good students while neglecting weaker students was not radical enough to prevent the correction of negative impressions, precluding a negativity effect. Instead, extended selective sampling led to gradually increasing polarization of positive impressions, and facilitated detection of positive performance changes. While these findings can be reconciled with the Fazio–Denrell model, they highlight the crucial role of auxiliary psychological assumptions about attitude learning, as distinguished from the formal model itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiedler, Klaus & Wöllert, Franz & Tauber, Benjamin & Hess, Philipp, 2013. "Applying sampling theories to attitude learning in a virtual school class environment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 222-231.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:122:y:2013:i:2:p:222-231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597813000769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiedler, Klaus & Walther, Eva & Freytag, Peter & Plessner, Henning, 2002. "Judgment Biases in a Simulated Classroom--A Cognitive-Environmental Approach," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 527-561, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoffart, Janine Christin & Olschewski, Sebastian & Rieskamp, Jörg, 2019. "Reaching for the star ratings: A Bayesian-inspired account of how people use consumer ratings," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 99-116.
    2. Fiedler, Klaus & Freytag, Peter & Meiser, Thorsten, 2008. "Pseudocontingencies: an integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion," Papers 08-36, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    3. Fiedler, Klaus, 2007. "The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making," Papers 07-51, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    4. Yaakov Kareev & Klaus Fiedler, 2004. "Does Decision Quality (Always) Increase with the Size of Information Samples? Some Vicissitudes in Applying the Law of Large Numbers," Discussion Paper Series dp347, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i:7:p:547-569 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Mandeep K. Dhami & Henrik Olsson, 2008. "Evolution of the interpersonal conflict paradigm," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3(7), pages 547-569, October.
    7. Unkelbach, Christian & Fiedler, Klaus & Freytag, Peter, 2007. "Information repetition in evaluative judgments: Easy to monitor, hard to control," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 37-52, May.
    8. Fiedler, Klaus & Kareev, Yaakov, 2007. "Implications and ramifications of a sample-size approach to intuition," Papers 07-52, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:122:y:2013:i:2:p:222-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.