IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v120y2013icp34-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information on parameters of interest decreases under transformations

Author

Listed:
  • Fewster, R.M.
  • Jupp, P.E.

Abstract

An important property of Fisher information is that it decreases weakly under transformation of random variables. Kagan and Rao (2003) [A. Kagan, C.R. Rao, Some properties and applications of the efficient Fisher score, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 116 (2003) 343–352] showed that, in the presence of nuisance parameters, Fisher information on the interest parameters decreases similarly. We prove here a general algebraic result on partitioned positive-definite matrices, and use it to show that the decrease in Fisher information on the interest parameters is bounded below by the conditional Fisher information on the interest parameters. A consequence is that standard large-sample confidence regions for parameters of interest based on the deviance, score and Wald statistics become asymptotically ‘wider’ under transformations, both in the context of independent identically distributed random variables and for the binomial detectability models of Fewster and Jupp (2009) [R.M. Fewster, P.E. Jupp, Inference on population size in binomial detectability models, Biometrika 96 (2009) 805–820]. One implication is that models that combine different data sources for inference on the interest parameters are asymptotically more efficient than models for any of the individual data sources, despite the possible need for further nuisance parameters when combining the sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Fewster, R.M. & Jupp, P.E., 2013. "Information on parameters of interest decreases under transformations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 34-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:120:y:2013:i:c:p:34-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2013.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X13000961
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmva.2013.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. M. Fewster & P. E. Jupp, 2009. "Inference on population size in binomial detectability models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(4), pages 805-820.
    2. Richard J. Barker & Laimonis Kavalieris, 2001. "Efficiency Gain from Auxiliary Data Requiring Additional Nuisance Parameters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 563-566, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Farcomeni, 2015. "Latent class recapture models with flexible behavioural response," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 75(1), pages 5-17.
    2. Yang Liu & Yukun Liu & Yan Fan & Han Geng, 2018. "Likelihood ratio confidence interval for the abundance under binomial detectability models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(5), pages 549-568, July.
    3. Shirley Pledger & Kenneth H. Pollock & James L. Norris, 2010. "Open Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: II. Jolly–Seber Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 883-890, September.
    4. Paul B. Conn & William L. Kendall & Michael D. Samuel, 2004. "A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 900-909, December.
    5. R. M. Fewster, 2011. "Variance Estimation for Systematic Designs in Spatial Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1518-1531, December.
    6. Yauck, Mamadou & Rivest, Louis-Paul, 2019. "On the estimation of population sizes in capture–recapture experiments," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 512-524.
    7. Matthew R. Schofield & Richard J. Barker & William A. Link & Heloise Pavanato, 2023. "Estimating population size: The importance of model and estimator choice," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3803-3817, December.
    8. Hannah Worthington & Rachel S. McCrea & Ruth King & Richard A. Griffiths, 2019. "Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probability Depends on Individual States," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 154-172, March.
    9. R. T. R. Vale & R. M. Fewster & E. L. Carroll & N. J. Patenaude, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation for model M t,α for capture–recapture data with misidentification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 962-971, December.
    10. Wen-Han Hwang & Richard Huggins, 2016. "Estimating Abundance from Presence–Absence Maps via a Paired Negative-Binomial Model," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 573-586, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:120:y:2013:i:c:p:34-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.