IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v21y1996i6p497-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The disappearing budget constraint on EU agricultural policy

Author

Listed:
  • Matthews, Alan

Abstract

Concern over budgetary costs has been the traditional driving force behind changes to the EU's Common Agricultural Policy. While the recent MacSharry reform of this policy was more related to external pressures arising from the need to reach an agreement on agriculture in the GATT Uruguay Round, many expect the budgetary constraint to re-emerge towards the end of this decade, particularly in the light of the impending accession of a number of Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). This paper argues that it is unlikely that there will be any budgetary need to further reform Europe's agricultural policy to accommodate the CEECs. Using a simple forecasting model of the FEOGA Guarantee budget, the paper demonstrates that, under a range of plausible assumptions for the key variables affecting the resources available for agricultural expenditure and the amount of that expenditure, a significant positive margin will emerge between the agricultural guideline and the cost of EU agricultural policy by the beginning of the next decade. While the budget constraint may disappear, however, both external and internal factors such as concern about agriculture's impact on the environment will remain as pressures for further CAP reform.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Matthews, Alan, 1996. "The disappearing budget constraint on EU agricultural policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 497-508, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:21:y:1996:i:6:p:497-508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-9192(96)00006-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael D. Helmar & William H. Meyers & Dermot J. Hayes, 1993. "GATT and CAP Reform: Different, Similar, or Redundant?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 93-gatt4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cathal O'Donoghue & Thia Hennessy, 2015. "Policy and Economic Change in the Agri-Food Sector in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 46(2), pages 315-337.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chantal Le Mouël, 1999. "Élargissement à l'Est et négociations commerciales internationales : quelle marge de manœuvre pour la PAC ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 329(1), pages 35-54.
    2. Westhoff, Patrick C. & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Beghin, John C. & Meyers, William H., 2004. "Challenges in Modeling the Effects of Trade Agreements on the Agricultural Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(2), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Alexandre Gohin & Hervé Guyomard & Chantai Le Mouël, 1998. "Éléments de définition d'une politique agricole commune pour le XXIe siècle [Promouvoir les rôles marchands et non marchands des agriculteurs européens ]," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 244(1), pages 22-31.
    4. Hervé Guyomard & Nadine Herrard & Chantal Le Mouël & Yves Le Roux & Thierry Trochet, 1996. "L'accord agricole de l'Uruguay Round et la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune : éléments d'analyse et de prospective," Working Papers hal-01594019, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:21:y:1996:i:6:p:497-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.