IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v42y2014i6p568-578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the eye of the beholder? An examination of the inter-rater reliability of the LSI-R and YLS/CMI in a correctional agency

Author

Listed:
  • Rocque, Michael
  • Plummer-Beale, Judy

Abstract

To examine the inter-rater reliability of two risk assessment tools: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) and the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI).

Suggested Citation

  • Rocque, Michael & Plummer-Beale, Judy, 2014. "In the eye of the beholder? An examination of the inter-rater reliability of the LSI-R and YLS/CMI in a correctional agency," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 568-578.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:42:y:2014:i:6:p:568-578
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.09.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235214000889
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.09.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holsinger, Alexander M. & Lowenkamp, Christopher T. & Latessa, Edward J., 2006. "Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 331-337.
    2. Caudy, Michael S. & Durso, Joseph M. & Taxman, Faye S., 2013. "How well do dynamic needs predict recidivism? Implications for risk assessment and risk reduction," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 458-466.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cuevas, Celina & Wolff, Kevin T. & Baglivio, Michael T., 2017. "Self-efficacy, aspirations, and residential placement outcomes: Why belief in a prosocial self matters," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Cuevas, Celina & Wolff, Kevin T. & Baglivio, Michael T., 2019. "Dynamic risk factors and timing of recidivism for youth in residential placement," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 154-166.
    3. Giguère, Guy & Lussier, Patrick, 2016. "Debunking the psychometric properties of the LS\CMI: An application of item response theory with a risk assessment instrument," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 207-218.
    4. Morgan, Robert D. & Kroner, Daryl G. & Mills, Jeremy F. & Serna, Catherine & McDonald, Brendan, 2013. "Dynamic risk assessment: A validation study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 115-124.
    5. Vaughn, Michael G. & Salas-Wright, Christopher P. & Maynard, Brandy R. & Qian, Zhengmin & Terzis, Lauren & Kusow, Abdi M. & DeLisi, Matt, 2014. "Criminal epidemiology and the immigrant paradox: Intergenerational discontinuity in violence and antisocial behavior among immigrants," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 483-490.
    6. Caudy, Michael S. & Durso, Joseph M. & Taxman, Faye S., 2013. "How well do dynamic needs predict recidivism? Implications for risk assessment and risk reduction," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 458-466.
    7. Janssen-de Ruijter, E.A.W. & Mulder, E.A. & Bongers, I.L. & Vermunt, J.K. & van Nieuwenhuizen, Ch., 2021. "One is not the other: Predicting offending after discharge from secure residential care of male adolescents with four risk profiles," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Tillyer, Marie Skubak & Vose, Brenda, 2011. "Social ecology, individual risk, and recidivism: A multilevel examination of main and moderating influences," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 452-459.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:42:y:2014:i:6:p:568-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.