IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v39y2011i4p320-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What works (or doesn't) in a DUI court? An example of expedited case processing

Author

Listed:
  • Bouffard, Jeffrey A.
  • Bouffard, Leana A.

Abstract

Purpose A number of policy efforts have aimed to reduce drunk driving, including deterrence-based policies and specialized treatment courts. This study examines the impact of expedited court processing on the county-wide rate of DUI offenses. It also examines the links between sanction swiftness, certainty, and severity and changes in DUI rates over time.Methods This study uses interrupted time series analysis to assess changes in DUI rates in one county over a time period including the introduction of a full-coverage, expedited court docket for DUI. Additionally, the three components of deterrence were examined.Result Findings reveal that the program implementation corresponded with a lower rate of DUI case filings, but not with a general reduction in alcohol-involved collisions in the county. Additionally, only sanction swiftness improved over time, while certainty remained stable and severity declined.Conclusions Results indicate that the introduction of the expedited court docket does not appear to have produced a deterrent effect on DUI. It may be that DUI offenders require more than expedited processing to overcome the issues that precipitate their offending. Future research and policy should explore both the impact of swiftness of punishment and the provision of appropriate treatment services in addressing DUI offending.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouffard, Jeffrey A. & Bouffard, Leana A., 2011. "What works (or doesn't) in a DUI court? An example of expedited case processing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 320-328, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:39:y:2011:i:4:p:320-328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235211000493
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bouffard, Jeffrey A. & Richardson, Katie A. & Franklin, Travis, 2010. "Drug courts for DWI offenders? The effectiveness of two hybrid drug courts on DWI offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 25-33, January.
    2. Taxman, Faye S. & Piquero, Alex, 1998. "On preventing drunk driving recidivism: an examination of rehabilitation and punishment approaches," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 129-143, March.
    3. Yeh, Stuart S., 2010. "Cost-benefit analysis of reducing crime through electronic monitoring of parolees and probationers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 1090-1096, September.
    4. Yu, Jiang, 2000. "Punishment and alcohol problems: Recidivism among drinking-driving offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 261-270.
    5. Yu, Jiang, 1994. "Punishment celerity and severity: Testing a specific deterrence model on drunk driving recidivism," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 355-366.
    6. Pratt, Travis C. & Holsinger, Alex M. & Latessa, Edward J., 2000. "Treating the chronic DUI offender "Turning Point" ten years later," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 271-281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bouffard, Jeff A. & Exum, M. Lyn & Niebuhr, Nicole, 2018. "Examining the stability and predictors of deterrability across multiple offense types within a sample of convicted felons," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 76-88.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahlin, Eileen M. & Zador, Paul L. & Rauch, William J. & Howard, Jan M. & Duncan, G. Doug, 2011. "First-time DWI offenders are at risk of recidivating regardless of sanctions imposed," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 137-142.
    2. Bouffard, Jeffrey A. & Richardson, Katie A. & Franklin, Travis, 2010. "Drug courts for DWI offenders? The effectiveness of two hybrid drug courts on DWI offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 25-33, January.
    3. John M. MacDonald & Andrew R. Morral & Barbara Raymond & Christine Eibner, 2007. "The Efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI Court," Evaluation Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 4-23, February.
    4. Yu, Jiang & Evans, Peggy Chin & Clark, Lucia Perfetti, 2006. "Alcohol addiction and perceived sanction risks: Deterring drinking drivers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 165-174.
    5. Alexeev, Sergey & Weatherburn, Don, 2022. "Fines for illicit drug use do not prevent future crime: evidence from randomly assigned judges," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 555-575.
    6. Buckenmaier, Johannes & Dimant, Eugen & Posten, Ann-Christin & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2017. "On punishment institutions and effective deterrence of illicit behavior," Kiel Working Papers 2090, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. A. J. Burns & Clay Posey & James F. Courtney & Tom L. Roberts & Prabhashi Nanayakkara, 0. "Organizational information security as a complex adaptive system: insights from three agent-based models," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    8. A. J. Burns & Tom L. Roberts & Clay Posey & Paul Benjamin Lowry & Bryan Fuller, 2023. "Going Beyond Deterrence: A Middle-Range Theory of Motives and Controls for Insider Computer Abuse," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 342-362, March.
    9. Johannes Buckenmaier & Eugen Dimant & Ann-Christin Posten & Ulrich Schmidt, 2021. "Efficient Institutions and Effective Deterrence: On Timing and Uncertainty of Formal Sanctions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 177-201, April.
    10. Payne, Brian K. & Gainey, Randy R. & Triplett, Ruth A. & Danner, Mona J. E., 2004. "What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 195-206.
    11. Ionel Bostan, 2022. "Electronic Surveillance in Court Proceedings and in the Execution of Criminal Penalties: Legislative and Logistical Steps Regarding Operationalising the Electronic Monitoring Information System (EMIS)," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Benjamin Hansen, 2015. "Punishment and Deterrence: Evidence from Drunk Driving," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1581-1617, April.
    13. Khanna, Poonam & Khan, Sarfraz A. & Krasikova, Dina & Miller, Stewart R., 2021. "Repeated engagement in misconduct by executives involved with financial restatements," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 194-203.
    14. Bowles, Roger Arthur & Florackis, Chrisostomos, 2007. "Duration of the time to reconviction: Evidence from UK prisoner discharge data," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 365-378.
    15. Dong, Hongming & Zhong, Shiquan & Xu, Shuxian & Tian, Junfang & Feng, Zhongxiang, 2021. "The relationships between traffic enforcement, personal norms and aggressive driving behaviors among normal e-bike riders and food delivery e-bike riders," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 138-146.
    16. Frank Sloan & Lindsey Eldred & Sabrina McCutchan & Alyssa Platt, 2016. "Deterring Rearrests for Drinking and Driving," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(2), pages 416-436, October.
    17. Stuart S. Yeh, 2015. "The Electronic Monitoring Paradigm: A Proposal for Transforming Criminal Justice in the USA," Laws, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Moore, Kathleen A. & Harrison, Melissa & Young, M. Scott & Ochshorn, Ezra, 2008. "A cognitive therapy treatment program for repeat DUI offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 539-545, November.
    19. Ryon, Stephanie Bontrager & Chiricos, Ted & Siennick, Sonja E. & Barrick, Kelle & Bales, William, 2017. "Sentencing in light of collateral consequences: Does age matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    20. A. J. Burns & Clay Posey & James F. Courtney & Tom L. Roberts & Prabhashi Nanayakkara, 2017. "Organizational information security as a complex adaptive system: insights from three agent-based models," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 509-524, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:39:y:2011:i:4:p:320-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.