IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v38yi3p276-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic supervision for sex offenders: Implications for work load, supervision goals, versatility, and policymaking

Author

Listed:
  • Payne, Brian K.
  • DeMichele, Matthew T.

Abstract

Electronic monitoring strategies are being used increasingly for sex offenders across the United States. Despite this increased use, few researchers have considered the broader implications for probation and parole officers when these tools are used. In this study, attention was given to how the use of electronic monitoring for sex offenders is related to supervision goals, work load, the use of other supervision strategies, and state level policies. Findings showed significant differences in several areas. The conclusion focuses on community corrections policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Payne, Brian K. & DeMichele, Matthew T., 2010. "Electronic supervision for sex offenders: Implications for work load, supervision goals, versatility, and policymaking," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 276-281, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:3:p:276-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(10)00034-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helms, Ronald, 2009. "Modeling the politics of punishment: A conceptual and empirical analysis of 'law in action' in criminal sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 10-20, January.
    2. Gabbidon, Shaun L. & Patrick, Patricia A. & Peterson, Steven A., 2006. "An empirical assessment of employee theft lawsuits involving allegations of employer misconduct," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 175-183.
    3. Hemmens, Craig & Marquart, James W., 2000. "Friend or foe? Race, age, and inmate perceptions of inmate-staff relations," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 297-312.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lussier, Patrick & Bouchard, Martin & Beauregard, Eric, 2011. "Patterns of criminal achievement in sexual offending: Unravelling the “successful” sex offender," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 433-444.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. E. Costanza & Ronald Helms & John C. Kilburn & David A. Bowers, 2020. "Criminal Threat, Immigrant/Minority Threat, and Political Ideology: An Examination of Handgun Permits Across Texas Counties," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1442-1460, July.
    2. Sajid Bashir & Misbah Nasir & Saira Qayyum & Ambreen Bashir, 2012. "Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behaviors in Public Sector Organizations of Pakistan," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 357-366, December.
    3. Hemmens, Craig & Stohr, Mary K. & Schoeler, Mary & Miller, Bona, 2002. "One step up, two steps back: The progression of perceptions of women's work in prisons and jails," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 473-489.
    4. Ronald Helms & S. E. Costanza, 2014. "Energy Inequality and Instrumental Violence," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:3:p:276-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.