IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v38yi1p69-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating the prison boss: Examining supervision among prison health care staff

Author

Listed:
  • Garland, Brett
  • McCarty, William

Abstract

Health care staff are instrumental in prisons given their roles in aiding security and the growing demand for medical services among prisoners. Unfortunately, little attention has been paid to this prison staff subpopulation. This study examined perceptions of supervision among 424 prison health care staff in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Participants felt that prison supervisors were most effective in clarifying expectations and least effective in giving feedback for performance, involving staff in planning, and extending job autonomy. Using hierarchical linear models (HLM), some unique findings emerged. Efficacy in dealing with inmates was the strongest predictor variable: health care staff who felt more positive and effective with inmates had more favorable feelings toward supervision. Staff working in high- and medium-security prisons had more positive feelings toward supervision than those in minimum security, and younger staff had more favorable attitudes toward supervisors than older staff. The implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Garland, Brett & McCarty, William, 2010. "Rating the prison boss: Examining supervision among prison health care staff," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 69-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:1:p:69-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(09)00144-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wright, Kevin N. & Saylor, William G., 1992. "A comparison of perceptions of the work environment between minority and non-minority employees of the federal prison system," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 63-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitchell, Ojmarrh & MacKenzie, Doris Layton & Gover, Angela R. & Styve, Gaylene J., 2001. "The influences of personal background on perceptions of juvenile correctional environments," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 67-76.
    2. Dowden, Craig & Tellier, Claude, 2004. "Predicting work-related stress in correctional officers: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 31-47.
    3. Sundt, Jody L. & Cullen, Francis T., 2002. "The correctional ideology of prison chaplains: A national survey," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 369-385.
    4. Butler, H. Daniel & Tasca, Melinda & Zhang, Yan & Carpenter, Channing, 2019. "A systematic and meta-analytic review of the literature on correctional officers: Identifying new avenues for research," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 84-92.
    5. Griffin, Marie L., 2001. "Job satisfaction among detention officers: Assessing the relative contribution of organizational climate variables," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 219-232.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:1:p:69-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.