IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v66y2013i9p1667-1673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace risk and protective factors for gambling problems among gambling industry employees

Author

Listed:
  • Hing, Nerilee
  • Gainsbury, Sally

Abstract

Having a stable healthy workforce is beneficial for the gambling industry, yet this workforce has comparatively high problem gambling rates. This study assesses the contribution of workplace risk and protective factors to gambling problems among gambling venue employees. Australian gambling industry employees (N=551) completed a survey measuring gambling behavior, problem gambling, and factors that may influence gambling. The study identifies five risk factors relating to problem gambling development – workplace motivators, influence of colleagues, workplace triggers, limited social opportunities, and familiarity and interest in gambling. Two protective factors are identified – exposed to gambling losses and problems and influence of colleagues. In addressing gambling problems, one factor – discouragement to address a gambling problem – distinguishes the problem gambler group. One factor – encouragement to address a gambling problem – provides protection for the staff. This is the first empirical attempt to quantify workplace factors and their relationships with gambling problems. The identification of risk and protective factors in gambling venues may prompt healthier workplace practices and effective prevention and treatment programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hing, Nerilee & Gainsbury, Sally, 2013. "Workplace risk and protective factors for gambling problems among gambling industry employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1667-1673.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:66:y:2013:i:9:p:1667-1673
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829631200358X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max W. Abbott & Rachel A. Volberg, 2006. "The Measurement of Adult Problem and Pathological Gambling," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 175-200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lena C. Quilty & Janine Robinson & Alexander Blaszczynski, 2015. "Responsible gambling training in Ontario casinos: employee attitudes and experience," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 361-376, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria E. Bellringer & Nick Garrett, 2021. "Risk Factors for Increased Online Gambling during COVID-19 Lockdowns in New Zealand: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Terri-Lynn MacKay & David C. Hodgins, 2011. "Cognitive distortions as a problem gambling risk factor in Internet gambling," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 163-175, December.
    3. Roser Granero & Susana Jiménez-Murcia & Fernando Fernández-Aranda & Amparo del Pino-Gutiérrez & Teresa Mena-Moreno & Gemma Mestre-Bach & Mónica Gómez-Peña & Laura Moragas & Neus Aymamí & Isabelle Giro, 2020. "Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:66:y:2013:i:9:p:1667-1673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.