IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v118y2020icp117-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design thinking for innovation: Composition, consequence, and contingency

Author

Listed:
  • Nakata, Cheryl
  • Hwang, Jiyoung

Abstract

Design thinking, a design-based approach to solving human problems, is increasingly adopted by firms to develop innovations. However, what design thinking is, how it works, whether it leads to successful new products and services, and if such outcomes depend on market turbulence are unresolved issues. To address these knowledge gaps, we theorize a nomological network of design thinking’s composition, consequence, and contingency, and then examine the model through a survey of innovation managers. We conclude that design thinking consists of six inter-related mindsets and actions, strengthens new product and service performance, and has robust effects across levels of market turbulence. Based on one of the first confirmatory studies of design thinking, we draw implications of our findings for innovation theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Nakata, Cheryl & Hwang, Jiyoung, 2020. "Design thinking for innovation: Composition, consequence, and contingency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 117-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:117-128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320304185
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Martin, Silvia L. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar (Raj) G. & Ciravegna, Luciano, 2018. "Service advantage built on service capabilities: An empirical inquiry of international new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 371-381.
    3. Christoph H. Loch, 2017. "Creativity and Risk Taking Aren't Rational: Behavioral Operations in MOT," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 591-604, April.
    4. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Scott A. Shane & Karl T. Ulrich, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 133-144, February.
    6. Morgan, Todd & Obal, Michael & Anokhin, Sergey, 2018. "Customer participation and new product performance: Towards the understanding of the mechanisms and key contingencies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 498-510.
    7. John Hulland & Hans Baumgartner & Keith Marion Smith, 2018. "Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 92-108, January.
    8. Ting Kong & Gang Li & Taiwen Feng & Linyan Sun, 2015. "Effects of marketing–manufacturing integration across stages of new product development on performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 2269-2284, April.
    9. Miozzo, Marcela & Desyllas, Panos & Lee, Hsing-fen & Miles, Ian, 2016. "Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1337-1351.
    10. Stefan H. Thomke, 1998. "Managing Experimentation in the Design of New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 743-762, June.
    11. Chen, Kaui-Hwang & Wang, Chun-Hsien & Huang, Shi-Zheng & Shen, George C., 2016. "Service innovation and new product performance: The influence of market-linking capabilities and market turbulence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 54-64.
    12. Judith Behrens & Holger Patzelt, 2018. "Incentives, Resources and Combinations of Innovation Radicalness and Innovation Speed," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/282983, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Schulders, 2022. "Co-Creating Smart Cities – Design Thinking for 21st Century Urban Planning," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 301-315.
    2. Ziheng Zhang & Rui Patricio & Gianluca Carella & Francesco Zurlo, 2022. "Supporting a Sustainable and Engaging Online Transition for Co-Design through Gamification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Larbi-Siaw, Otu & Xuhua, Hu & Owusu, Ebenezer & Owusu-Agyeman, Abigail & Fulgence, Brou Ettien & Frimpong, Samuel Akwasi, 2022. "Eco-innovation, sustainable business performance and market turbulence moderation in emerging economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Elahe Hosseini & Alireza Rajabipoor Meybodi, 2023. "Proposing a Model for Sustainable Development of Creative Industries Based on Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    5. Vera Amicarelli & Giuseppina Miuli & Christian Bux & Raluca Mariana Grosu, 2022. "Advancing University-Business Cooperation in the Mediterranean Area," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(61), pages 832-832, August.
    6. Johannes Hofmeister & Dominik K. Kanbach & Jens Hogreve, 2024. "Service productivity: a systematic review of a dispersed research area," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1249-1281, September.
    7. Cai, Ying & Lin, Jun & Zhang, Ruxin, 2023. "When and how to implement design thinking in the innovation process: A longitudinal case study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Seonyeong Lim & Minseo Kim & Yeong-wha Sawng, 2022. "Design Thinking for Public R&D: Focus on R&D Performance at Public Research Institutes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Fu, Shihui & Sun, Yi & Guo, Yanting, 2023. "Revealing product innovation practitioners’ perspectives on design thinking: An exploratory research using Q-sort methodology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shore, Adam & Tiwari, Manisha & Tandon, Priyanka & Foropon, Cyril, 2024. "Building entrepreneurial resilience during crisis using generative AI: An empirical study on SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Ho-Taek Yi & Fortune Edem Amenuvor & Henry Boateng, 2021. "The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on New Product Creativity, Competitive Advantage and New Product Performance in SMEs: The Moderating Role of Corporate Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    4. Surajit Bag & Shivam Gupta & Ajay Kumar & Uthayasankar Sivarajah, 2021. "An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge creation and B2B marketing rational decision making for improving firm performance," Post-Print hal-03188195, HAL.
    5. Laxmi Gupta & Ravi Shankar, 2022. "Adoption of Battery Management System in Utility Grid: An Empirical Study Using Structural Equation Modeling," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 573-596, December.
    6. Haiyang Li & John B. Bingham & Elizabeth E. Umphress, 2007. "Fairness from the Top: Perceived Procedural Justice and Collaborative Problem Solving in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 200-216, April.
    7. Zhang, Haisu & Wu, Fang & Cui, Anna Shaojie, 2015. "Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: A contingency perspective," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 297-308.
    8. Tiwari, Manisha & Bryde, David J. & Stavropoulou, Foteini & Dubey, Rameshwar & Kumari, Sushma & Foropon, Cyril, 2024. "Modelling supply chain Visibility, digital Technologies, environmental dynamism and healthcare supply chain Resilience: An organisation information processing theory perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Stylianos Kavadias & Karl T. Ulrich, 2020. "Innovation and New Product Development: Reflections and Insights from the Research Published in the First 20 Years of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 84-92, January.
    10. Homburg, Christian & Böhler, Sina & Hohenberg, Sebastian, 2020. "Organizing for cross-selling: Do it right, or not at all," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 56-73.
    11. Augusto, Mário & Godinho, Pedro & Torres, Pedro, 2019. "Building customers’ resilience to negative information in the airline industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 235-248.
    12. Ovuakporie, Oghogho Destina & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Wang, Chengang & Wei, Yingqi, 2021. "Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    13. Lu, Keying & Zou, Tengjian & Du, Jian, 2024. "Two forms of customer involvement and new product development performance in the digital context: The moderating role of new product development stage," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Kusi, Samuel Yaw & Gabrielsson, Peter & Baumgarth, Carsten, 2022. "How classical and entrepreneurial brand management increases the performance of internationalising SMEs?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    15. Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Hajiheydari, Nastaran, 2020. "On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 180-194.
    16. Adomako, Samuel, 2021. "Resource-induced coping heuristics and entrepreneurial orientation in dynamic environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 477-487.
    17. Xie, Chaohong & Chiang, Chung-Yean & Xu, Xianhao & Gong, Yeming, 2023. "The impact of buy-online-and-return-in-store channel integration on online and offline behavioral intentions: The role of offline store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    18. Bag, Surajit & Gupta, Shivam & Chan, Hau-Ling & Kumar, Ajay, 2024. "Building smart product-service systems capabilities for circular supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Pyper, Keith & Marie Doherty, Anne & Gounaris, Spiros & Wilson, Alan, 2022. "A contingency-based approach to the nexus between international strategic brand management and export performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 472-488.
    20. Mandler, Timo & Sezen, Burcu & Chen, Jieke & Özsomer, Ayşegül, 2021. "Performance consequences of marketing standardization/adaptation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 416-435.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:117-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.