IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jappol/v28y2009i4p328-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does information uncertainty affect investors' responses to analysts' forecast revisions? An investigation of accounting restatements

Author

Listed:
  • Barniv, Ran R.
  • Cao, Jian

Abstract

Prior studies provide only limited evidence on how and why investors rely on analyst forecasts. We investigate one aspect of this research paradigm by examining investor response to analyst forecast revisions using accounting restatements as a proxy for uncertainty. We find that investors tend to rely more on the information that analyst characteristics convey about forecast accuracy in restatement firms than in non-restatement firms. The evidence also suggests that the level of restatement intensity and the length of reaction window affect investors' reliance on these characteristics. Further analysis demonstrates that the innovation in forecast revisions also affects the association between investor response and analyst characteristics. Our findings are consistent with increased information uncertainty stimulating investor demand for analyst research.

Suggested Citation

  • Barniv, Ran R. & Cao, Jian, 2009. "Does information uncertainty affect investors' responses to analysts' forecast revisions? An investigation of accounting restatements," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 328-348, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:328-348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278-4254(09)00038-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Min & Zhu, Zhaobo & Han, Peiwen & Chen, Bo & Liu, Jia, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty and analyst behaviours: Evidence from the United Kingdom," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Barber, Russell & Hollie, Dana & Massel, Norman, 2024. "The concerns of linking IRS tax disclosures to financial statements on analysts' effective tax rate forecasts," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Wang, Jiangyuan & Gan, Jiawu & Li, Zhen, 2021. "Industrial policy, uncertainty, and analysts’ earnings forecast: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 249-258.
    4. Le, Cao Hoang Anh & Shan, Yaowen & Taylor, Stephen, 2024. "International economic policy uncertainty and analysts' earnings forecasts," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Chakrabarty, Bidisha & Seetharaman, Ananth & Wang, Weimin, 2014. "Institutional versus retail trades following financial restatements: The effect of Sarbanes-Oxley," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 12-25.
    6. Min Chen & Zhaobo Zhu & Peiwen Han & Bo Chen & Jia Liu, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty and analyst behaviours: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Post-Print hal-03628930, HAL.
    7. Li, Wanyun, 2022. "Disclosure of internal control material weaknesses and optimism in analyst earnings forecasts," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    8. Laure de Batz & Evžen Kočenda, 2024. "Financial crime and punishment: A meta‐analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1338-1398, September.
    9. Sun, Qian & Cheng, Xiaoke & Gao, Shenghao & Yang, Mingjing, 2020. "Are SEO investors misled by analyst optimism bias? Evidence from investor bids in SEO auctions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 90-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:328-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jaccpubpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.