IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intman/v9y2003i4p419-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comments on globalization, interdisciplinary research, myopia and parochialism, government, convergence, and culture

Author

Listed:
  • Sobel, Andrew

Abstract

Globalization presents social scientists with a wide variety of issues and challenges that cut across disciplinary boundaries. Disciplinary boundaries encourage specialization and advances in understanding aspects of social behavior, but specialization also creates barriers to more comprehensive understanding of social behavior such as globalization. Successful interdisciplinary efforts entail gains from trade across disciplinary specializations. The papers in this volume help outline an agenda for interdisciplinary investigation of globalization to knock down disciplinary boundaries and encourage gains from trade that further our understanding of globalization. But much work remains before we see real fruits from such efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sobel, Andrew, 2003. "Comments on globalization, interdisciplinary research, myopia and parochialism, government, convergence, and culture," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 419-425.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:9:y:2003:i:4:p:419-425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425303000590
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stevens, Michael J. & Bird, Allan, 2004. "On the myth of believing that globalization is a myth: or the effects of misdirected responses on obsolescing an emergent substantive discourse," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 501-510.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intman:v:9:y:2003:i:4:p:419-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601266/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.