IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v66y2018icp98-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some people are attracted sexually to intelligence: A psychometric evaluation of sapiosexuality

Author

Listed:
  • Gignac, Gilles E.
  • Darbyshire, Joey
  • Ooi, Michelle

Abstract

The emergence of the popular culture notion of a sapiosexual, an individual who finds high levels of intelligence (IQ) the most sexually attractive characteristic in a person, suggests that a high IQ may be a genuinely sexually attractive trait, at least for some people. Consequently, mean desirability ratings of IQ on a percentile continuum were estimated, across sexual attraction specifically and long-term partner interest conditions (N=383). Furthermore, we evaluated the psychometric properties of a newly developed measure, the Sapiosexuality Questionnaire (SapioQ). Finally, we estimated the correlation between objective intelligence and the SapioQ. On average, the 90th percentile of intelligence (IQ≈120) was rated to be the most sexually attractive and the most desirable in a long-term partner. However, 8.1% and 1.3% of the sample scored above 4.0 and 4.5, respectively, on the SapioQ (theoretical range: 1 to 5), which had respectable psychometric properties. The desirability ratings across the IQ percentile continuum interacted with the two conditions (i.e., sexual attraction specifically versus partner interest), such that the rater desirability of IQ increased more substantially for partner interest than sexual attraction specifically across the 25th to 75th IQ percentiles. Finally, objective intelligence correlated negatively with rated sexual attraction specifically and partner interest for a hypothetical person at 25th and 50th percentiles of IQ (r≈−0.25). By contrast, objective intelligence failed to correlate with sapiosexuality (r=−0.02, p=0.765; BF01=12.84). The results were interpreted to suggest that, for most people, a very high IQ in a partner (IQ 135+) is not the most attractive level of intelligence, which may be considered supportive of a version of the threshold hypothesis of intelligence. Finally, although sapiosexuality may be a genuine psychological construct, it appears to be influenced by non-intellective factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Gignac, Gilles E. & Darbyshire, Joey & Ooi, Michelle, 2018. "Some people are attracted sexually to intelligence: A psychometric evaluation of sapiosexuality," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 98-111.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:98-111
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617301551
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gignac, Gilles E. & Zajenkowski, Marcin, 2019. "People tend to overestimate their romantic partner's intelligence even more than their own," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 41-51.
    2. Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo & Sarraf, Matthew A. & Woodley of Menie, Michael A. & Miller, Geoffrey F., 2023. "The ten-million-year explosion: Paleocognitive reconstructions of domain-general cognitive ability (G) in extinct primates," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Gignac, Gilles E. & Callis, Zoe M.V., 2020. "The costs of being exceptionally intelligent: Compatibility and interpersonal skill concerns," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Arandjelović, Ognjen, 2024. "The Ill-Thought-Through Aim to Eliminate the Education Gap Across the Socio-Economic Spectrum," SocArXiv m9ats, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:98-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.