IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v108y2025ics0160289624000904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared reading aloud fosters intelligence: Three cluster-randomized control trials in elementary and middle school

Author

Listed:
  • Batini, Federico
  • Bartolucci, Marco
  • Toti, Giulia
  • Castano, Emanuele

Abstract

Storytelling played a crucial role in human evolution. To this day, through stories humans gain declarative and procedural knowledge, and learn the skills that support learning itself. Research shows that reading stories to children enhances their reading and language skills. Does it also enhance their intelligence? To answer this question, we conducted three (N = 626, 254, 195) longitudinal, cluster-randomized control trials in Italian elementary and middle schools. Over a 4-month period, for half of the participants 1 h/day of standard, active language instructional activities were substituted with reading-aloud of stories by a teacher. Compared to those who kept doing language instructional activities, read-aloud condition children showed a stronger increase on two measures of intelligence focusing on knowing things and thinking skills. This result, which emerged in three independent trials conducted in different regions of Italy, suggests avenues for easily scalable interventions to improve children's intelligence.

Suggested Citation

  • Batini, Federico & Bartolucci, Marco & Toti, Giulia & Castano, Emanuele, 2025. "Shared reading aloud fosters intelligence: Three cluster-randomized control trials in elementary and middle school," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0160289624000904
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2024.101896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000904
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2024.101896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0160289624000904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.