IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v105y2024ics016028962400031x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variation in general retrieval ability in semantic and autobiographical fluency tasks

Author

Listed:
  • Unsworth, Nash

Abstract

Individual differences in general retrieval ability in semantic and autobiographical fluency tasks were examined in the current study. Participants performed multiple fluency tasks requiring retrieval from semantic memory, autobiographical semantic memory, and autobiographical memory. Participants also completed multiple measures of working memory and vocabulary. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that three distinct, but correlated fluency factors (semantic memory, autobiographical semantic memory, and autobiographical memory) best accounted for the data. These factors loaded onto a higher-order general retrieval factor. Working memory was correlated with the semantic, autobiographical semantic, and the higher-order general retrieval factor. Vocabulary correlated positively with semantic memory, but negatively autobiographical semantic memory, and not significantly with the higher-order factor. These results suggest there is a general retrieval ability that cuts across semantic and autobiographical fluency tasks and this general retrieval factor is correlated with working memory, but not necessarily with vocabulary. These results provide important information on the nature of individual differences in general retrieval ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Unsworth, Nash, 2024. "Variation in general retrieval ability in semantic and autobiographical fluency tasks," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:105:y:2024:i:c:s016028962400031x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2024.101837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028962400031X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2024.101837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forthmann, Boris & Jendryczko, David & Scharfen, Jana & Kleinkorres, Ruben & Benedek, Mathias & Holling, Heinz, 2019. "Creative ideation, broad retrieval ability, and processing speed: A confirmatory study of nested cognitive abilities," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 59-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Churan Wang & Xiaolin Zhang & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainable Arts Education: Comparative Analysis of Creative Process Measurement Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Miroshnik, Kirill G. & Shcherbakova, Olga V., 2019. "The proportion and creativity of “old” and “new” ideas: Are they related to fluid intelligence?," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Miroshnik, Kirill G. & Forthmann, Boris & Karwowski, Maciej & Benedek, Mathias, 2023. "The relationship of divergent thinking with broad retrieval ability and processing speed: A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Boris Forthmann & Mark A. Runco, 2020. "An Empirical Test of the Inter-Relationships between Various Bibliometric Creative Scholarship Indicators," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Anum Naz & Danish Ahmed Siddiqui, 2021. "Ethical Leadership and Deviant Workplace Behaviour: The Role Ethical Reasoning, LMX, Distributive Justice, and Psychological Safety and Attachment in a Moderated Mediation Framework," Global Journal of Educational Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:105:y:2024:i:c:s016028962400031x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.