IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v42y2008i2p787-796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A sensitivity analysis of typical life insurance contracts with respect to the technical basis

Author

Listed:
  • Christiansen, Marcus C.

Abstract

In [Christiansen, M.C., 2007. A sensitivity analysis concept for life insurance with respect to a valuation basis of infinite dimension. Insurance: Math. Econom. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.07.005] a sensitivity analysis concept was introduced for the prospective reserve of individual life insurance contracts as functional of the technical basis parameters such as interest rate, mortality probability, disability probability, et cetera. On the basis of that concept, the present paper gives in addition the sensitivities of the premium level. Applying these approaches, an extensive sensitivity analysis is carried out: A study of the basic life insurance contract types [`]pure endowment insurance', [`]temporary life insurance', [`]annuity insurance' and [`]disability insurance' identifies their diverse characteristics, in particular their weakest points concerning fluctuations of the technical basis. An investigation of combinations of these insurance contract types shows what synergy effects can be expected by creating insurance packages.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiansen, Marcus C., 2008. "A sensitivity analysis of typical life insurance contracts with respect to the technical basis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 787-796, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:42:y:2008:i:2:p:787-796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6687(07)00095-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramlau-Hansen, Henrik, 1988. "The emergence of profit in life insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 225-236, December.
    2. Milbrodt, Hartmut & Stracke, Andrea, 1997. "Markov models and Thiele's integral equations for the prospective reserve," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 187-235, May.
    3. Olivieri, Annamaria, 2001. "Uncertainty in mortality projections: an actuarial perspective," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 231-245, October.
    4. Khalaf-Allah, M. & Haberman, S. & Verrall, R., 2006. "Measuring the effect of mortality improvements on the cost of annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 231-249, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rabitti, Giovanni & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2020. "Is mortality or interest rate the most important risk in annuity models? A comparison of sensitivity analysis methods," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 48-58.
    2. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Furrer, Christian, 2021. "Dynamics of state-wise prospective reserves in the presence of non-monotone information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 81-98.
    3. Christiansen, Marcus C., 2010. "Biometric worst-case scenarios for multi-state life insurance policies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 190-197, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christiansen, Marcus C., 2008. "A sensitivity analysis concept for life insurance with respect to a valuation basis of infinite dimension," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 680-690, April.
    2. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Furrer, Christian, 2021. "Dynamics of state-wise prospective reserves in the presence of non-monotone information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 81-98.
    3. Christiansen, Marcus C., 2010. "Biometric worst-case scenarios for multi-state life insurance policies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 190-197, October.
    4. Hári, Norbert & De Waegenaere, Anja & Melenberg, Bertrand & Nijman, Theo E., 2008. "Longevity risk in portfolios of pension annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 505-519, April.
    5. Biffis, Enrico, 2005. "Affine processes for dynamic mortality and actuarial valuations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 443-468, December.
    6. Blake, David & Dowd, Kevin & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2008. "Longevity risk and the Grim Reaper's toxic tail: The survivor fan charts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 1062-1066, June.
    7. D'Amico, Guglielmo & Singh, Shakti & Selvamuthu, Dharmaraja, 2024. "Optimal investment-disinvestment choices in health-dependent variable annuity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-15.
    8. D’Amato, Valeria & Di Lorenzo, Emilia & Haberman, Steven & Sagoo, Pretty & Sibillo, Marilena, 2018. "De-risking strategy: Longevity spread buy-in," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 124-136.
    9. Matheus R Grasselli & Sebastiano Silla, 2009. "A policyholder's utility indifference valuation model for the guaranteed annuity option," Papers 0908.3196, arXiv.org.
    10. Koissi, Marie-Claire & Shapiro, Arnold F., 2006. "Fuzzy formulation of the Lee-Carter model for mortality forecasting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 287-309, December.
    11. Brouhns, Natacha & Denuit, Michel & Vermunt, Jeroen K., 2002. "A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 373-393, December.
    12. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Djehiche, Boualem, 2020. "Nonlinear reserving and multiple contract modifications in life insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 187-195.
    13. Marcus C. Christiansen & Michel M. Denuit & Jan Dhaene, 2014. "Reserve-Dependent Benefits and Costs in Life and Health Insurance Contracts," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-117/IV/DSF80, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Ludkovski, Michael & Young, Virginia R., 2008. "Indifference pricing of pure endowments and life annuities under stochastic hazard and interest rates," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 14-30, February.
    15. Milbrodt, Hartmut, 2000. "Hattendorff's theorem for non-smooth continuous-time Markov models II: Application," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Annamaria Olivieri & Ermanno Pitacco, 2012. "Life tables in actuarial models: from the deterministic setting to a Bayesian approach," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 96(2), pages 127-153, June.
    17. Roman N. Schulze & Thomas Post, 2010. "Individual Annuity Demand Under Aggregate Mortality Risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(2), pages 423-449, June.
    18. Ahmad, Jamaal & Bladt, Mogens & Furrer, Christian, 2023. "Aggregate Markov models in life insurance: Properties and valuation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 50-69.
    19. Zeddouk, Fadoua & Devolder, Pierre, 2019. "Mean reversion in stochastic mortality : why and how?," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019018, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Hendrik Hansen, 2013. "The forecasting performance of mortality models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 97(1), pages 11-31, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:42:y:2008:i:2:p:787-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.