IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v101y2021ipbp173-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Haezendonck-Goovaerts capital allocation rules

Author

Listed:
  • Canna, Gabriele
  • Centrone, Francesca
  • Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of capital allocation for a peculiar class of risk measures, namely the Haezendonck-Goovaerts (HG) ones (Bellini and Rosazza Gianin, 2008; Goovaerts et al., 2004). To this aim, we generalize the capital allocation rule (CAR) introduced by Xun et al. (2019) for Orlicz risk premia (Haezendonck and Goovaerts, 1982) as well as for HG risk measures, using an approach based on Orlicz quantiles (Bellini and Rosazza Gianin, 2012). We therefore study the properties of different CARs for HG risk measures in the quantile-based setting. Finally, we provide robust versions of the introduced CARs, considering ambiguity both over the probabilistic model and over the Young function, following the scheme of Bellini et al. (2018).

Suggested Citation

  • Canna, Gabriele & Centrone, Francesca & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2021. "Haezendonck-Goovaerts capital allocation rules," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 173-185.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:101:y:2021:i:pb:p:173-185
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668721001165
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2016. "Objective rationality and uncertainty averse preferences," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(2), May.
    2. Cerreia-Vioglio, S. & Maccheroni, F. & Marinacci, M. & Montrucchio, L., 2011. "Uncertainty averse preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(4), pages 1275-1330, July.
    3. Michael Kalkbrener, 2005. "An Axiomatic Approach To Capital Allocation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 425-437, July.
    4. Bellini, Fabio & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2008. "On Haezendonck risk measures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 986-994, June.
    5. Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
    6. Xun, Li & Zhou, Yangzhi & Zhou, Yong, 2019. "A generalization of Expected Shortfall based capital allocation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 193-199.
    7. Bellini, Fabio & Klar, Bernhard & Müller, Alfred & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2014. "Generalized quantiles as risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-48.
    8. Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci & Aldo Rustichini, 2006. "Ambiguity Aversion, Robustness, and the Variational Representation of Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(6), pages 1447-1498, November.
    9. Goovaerts, Marc J. & Kaas, Rob & Dhaene, Jan & Tang, Qihe, 2004. "Some new classes of consistent risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 505-516, June.
    10. Tsanakas, Andreas, 2009. "To split or not to split: Capital allocation with convex risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 268-277, April.
    11. Jan Dhaene & Andreas Tsanakas & Emiliano A. Valdez & Steven Vanduffel, 2012. "Optimal Capital Allocation Principles," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 79(1), pages 1-28, March.
    12. E. Kromer & L. Overbeck & K. Zilch, 2016. "Systemic risk measures on general measurable spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(2), pages 323-357, October.
    13. Vali Asimit & Liang Peng & Ruodu Wang & Alex Yu, 2019. "An efficient approach to quantile capital allocation and sensitivity analysis," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1131-1156, October.
    14. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    15. Haezendonck, J. & Goovaerts, M., 1982. "A new premium calculation principle based on Orlicz norms," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 41-53, January.
    16. Markus K. Brunnermeier & Patrick Cheridito, 2019. "Measuring and Allocating Systemic Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Bellini, Fabio & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2012. "Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measures and Orlicz quantiles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 107-114.
    18. Centrone, Francesca & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2018. "Capital allocation à la Aumann–Shapley for non-differentiable risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 667-675.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gómez, Fabio & Tang, Qihe & Tong, Zhiwei, 2022. "The gradient allocation principle based on the higher moment risk measure," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bellini, Fabio & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2021. "Dynamic robust Orlicz premia and Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 438-446.
    2. Wang, Wei & Xu, Huifu & Ma, Tiejun, 2023. "Optimal scenario-dependent multivariate shortfall risk measure and its application in risk capital allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 322-347.
    3. Gómez, Fabio & Tang, Qihe & Tong, Zhiwei, 2022. "The gradient allocation principle based on the higher moment risk measure," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Xun, Li & Jiang, Renqiao & Guo, Jianhua, 2021. "The conditional Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measure," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Grant, Simon & Polak, Ben, 2013. "Mean-dispersion preferences and constant absolute uncertainty aversion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(4), pages 1361-1398.
    6. Grechuk, Bogdan, 2023. "Extended gradient of convex function and capital allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 429-437.
    7. Gabriele Canna & Francesca Centrone & Emanuela Rosazza Gianin, 2021. "Capital Allocation Rules and the No-Undercut Property," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Samuel Drapeau & Michael Kupper, 2013. "Risk Preferences and Their Robust Representation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 28-62, February.
    9. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.
    10. Knispel, Thomas & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Svindland, Gregor, 2016. "Robust optimal risk sharing and risk premia in expanding pools," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 182-195.
    11. Tang, Qihe & Yang, Fan, 2014. "Extreme value analysis of the Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measure with a general Young function," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 311-320.
    12. Sigrid Källblad, 2017. "Risk- and ambiguity-averse portfolio optimization with quasiconcave utility functionals," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 397-425, April.
    13. Mao, Tiantian & Hu, Taizhong, 2012. "Second-order properties of the Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measure for extreme risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 333-343.
    14. Niushan Gao & Cosimo Munari & Foivos Xanthos, 2019. "Stability properties of Haezendonck-Goovaerts premium principles," Papers 1909.10735, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    15. Ahn, Jae Youn & Shyamalkumar, Nariankadu D., 2014. "Asymptotic theory for the empirical Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 78-90.
    16. Zhiping Chen & Qianhui Hu & Ruiyue Lin, 2016. "Performance ratio-based coherent risk measure and its application," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 681-693, May.
    17. Roger J. A. Laeven & Mitja Stadje, 2013. "Entropy Coherent and Entropy Convex Measures of Risk," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 265-293, May.
    18. Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone & Maccheroni, Fabio & Marinacci, Massimo & Montrucchio, Luigi, 2012. "Probabilistic sophistication, second order stochastic dominance and uncertainty aversion," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 271-283.
    19. Dong, Xueqi, 2021. "Uncertainty Aversion and Convexity in Portfolio Choice," MPRA Paper 108264, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Faro, José Heleno & Lefort, Jean-Philippe, 2019. "Dynamic objective and subjective rationality," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capital allocation; Haezendonck-Goovaerts risk measures; Orlicz risk premium; Quantiles; Ambiguity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:101:y:2021:i:pb:p:173-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.