IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v34y2014i4p446-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of individualism–collectivism cultural orientation on eWOM information

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Chuan
  • Wu, Jing
  • Shi, Yani
  • Xu, Yun

Abstract

Drawing upon elaboration likelihood model (ELM) and espoused culture, this study predicts that eWOM reader's individualism–collectivism orientation (ICO) moderates eWOM antecedent factors’ effects on the perception of information credibility. 274 data were collected from two leading electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) forums in China, the results confirm our prediction: eWOM reader's ICO positively moderates information sidedness’ effect on the perception of information credibility, it also negatively moderates the relationships between information consistency/information rating and information credibility. These findings validate the necessity and importance to consider readers’ espoused cultural differences in eWOM context.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Chuan & Wu, Jing & Shi, Yani & Xu, Yun, 2014. "The effects of individualism–collectivism cultural orientation on eWOM information," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 446-456.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:446-456
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401214000383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xianghua Lu & Sulin Ba & Lihua Huang & Yue Feng, 2013. "Promotional Marketing or Word-of-Mouth? Evidence from Online Restaurant Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 596-612, September.
    2. Stephanie Watts Sussman & Wendy Schneier Siegal, 2003. "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    3. Jiacheng, Wei & Lu, Liu & Francesco, Calabrese A., 2010. "A cognitive model of intra-organizational knowledge-sharing motivations in the view of cross-culture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 220-230.
    4. Beckmann, Daniela & Menkhoff, Lukas & Suto, Megumi, 2008. "Does culture influence asset managers' views and behavior?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(3-4), pages 624-643, September.
    5. Lee, So-Hyun & Noh, Seung-Eui & Kim, Hee-Woong, 2013. "A mixed methods approach to electronic word-of-mouth in the open-market context," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 687-696.
    6. Mazaheri, Ebrahim & Richard, Marie-Odile & Laroche, Michel, 2011. "Online consumer behavior: Comparing Canadian and Chinese website visitors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 958-965, September.
    7. C. Nadine Wathen & Jacquelyn Burkell, 2002. "Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(2), pages 134-144.
    8. Kai H Lim & Kwok Leung & Choon Ling Sia & Matthew KO Lee, 2004. "Is eCommerce boundary-less? Effects of individualism–collectivism and uncertainty avoidance on Internet shopping," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(6), pages 545-559, November.
    9. Cheng, Hsiu-Hua & Huang, Shih-Wei, 2013. "Exploring antecedents and consequence of online group-buying intention: An extended perspective on theory of planned behavior," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 185-198.
    10. Gupta, Pranjal & Harris, Judy, 2010. "How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1041-1049, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sangmi Chai & Bomi Choi & Minkyun Kim & T. C. E. Cheng, 2023. "Why do people speak about products online? The role of opinion leadership," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Fitria Dwi Puspita & Abdul Wahib Muhaimin & Silvana Maulidah, 2024. "Study of Porang Rice Purchase Intention: Moderating Role of Price Sensitivity," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 2630-2642, January.
    3. Jing Liang & Ming Li & Jie Wang & Yating Ma, 2023. "The Influencing Factors of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Q&As," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    4. Zhang, Yun & Weng, Qingxiong & Zhu, Nan, 2018. "The relationships between electronic banking adoption and its antecedents: A meta-analytic study of the role of national culture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 76-87.
    5. Liao, Junyun & Chen, Jiawen & Zhao, Haichuan & Li, Muhua, 2023. "Fanning the flames: Transmitting negative word of mouth of rival brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Madelyn Mendoza-Moreira & Beatriz Moliner-Velázquez, 2022. "Efectos de las consultas boca a boca en redes sociales en la compra de cosméticos en Ecuador," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 38(164), pages 358-369, September.
    7. Benedikt M. Brand & Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin & Theresa Maria Rausch, 2022. "Cultural differences in processing online customer reviews: holistic versus analytic thinkers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1039-1060, September.
    8. Verma, Deepak & Prakash Dewani, Prem & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Dwivedi, Yogesh & Del Giudice, Manilo, 2023. "A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of eWOM credibility: Investigation of moderating role of culture and platform type," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hui-Chih & Doong, Her-Sen, 2010. "Argument form and spokesperson type: The recommendation strategy of virtual salespersons," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 493-501.
    2. Jehad Imlawi, 2017. "E-WOM Adoption and Sharing Behavior in Social Network Sites: The Impact of Engagement in SNSs," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 87-97, June.
    3. Liu, Zhiwei & Park, Sangwon, 2015. "What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-151.
    4. Choi-Meng Leong & Alexa Min-Wei Loi & Steve Woon, 2022. "The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(2), pages 145-157, June.
    5. Foley, Sean & Frijns, Bart & Garel, Alexandre & Roh, Tai-Yong, 2022. "Who buys Bitcoin? The cultural determinants of Bitcoin activity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Ruiz-Mafe, Carla & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Curras-Perez, Rafael, 2018. "The role of emotions and conflicting online reviews on consumers' purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 336-344.
    7. Lifang Peng & Qinyu Liao & Xiaorong Wang & Xuanfang He, 2016. "Factors affecting female user information adoption: an empirical investigation on fashion shopping guide websites," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 145-169, June.
    8. Benedikt Berger, 2018. "Commerce-oriented revenue models for content providers: an experimental study of commerciality’s effect on credibility," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(1), pages 93-109, February.
    9. Onofrei, George & Filieri, Raffaele & Kennedy, Lorraine, 2022. "Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-112.
    10. Zheng, Lili, 2021. "The classification of online consumer reviews: A systematic literature review and integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 226-251.
    11. Chou, Chien-Hsiang & Wang, Yi-Shun & Tang, Tzung-I, 2015. "Exploring the determinants of knowledge adoption in virtual communities: A social influence perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 364-376.
    12. Park, Sangwon & Nicolau, Juan L., 2015. "Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 67-83.
    13. Betty Purwandari & Latifatul Khairiyah & Mardiana Purwaningsih & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Nur Fitriah Ayuning Budi & Kongkiti Phusavat, 2023. "Why do people donate online? A perspective from dual credibility transfer," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 393-425, June.
    14. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    15. Reimer, Thomas & Benkenstein, Martin, 2016. "When good WOM hurts and bad WOM gains: The effect of untrustworthy online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5993-6001.
    16. Bettina Lis, 2013. "In eWOM We Trust," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(3), pages 129-140, June.
    17. Kim, Jin-Young & Hlee, Sunyoung & Joun, Youhee, 2016. "Green practices of the hotel industry: Analysis through the windows of smart tourism system," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1340-1349.
    18. Hee-Min Lee & Jee-Won Kang & Young Namkung, 2021. "Instagram Users’ Information Acceptance Process for Food-Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Kumar, Aman & Shankar, Amit & Behl, Abhishek & Arya, Varsha & Gupta, Nakul, 2023. "Should I share it? Factors influencing fake news-sharing behaviour: A behavioural reasoning theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Leo-Paul Dana & Demetris Vrontis & Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sheshadri Chatterjee, 2023. "Entrepreneurship Strategy through Social Commerce Platform: An Empirical Approach Using Contagion Theory and Information Adoption Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:446-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.