IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v3y2009i3p233-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete and continuous conceptualizations of science: Implications for knowledge domain visualization

Author

Listed:
  • Skupin, André

Abstract

Visual depiction of the structure and evolution of science has been proposed as a key strategy for dealing with the large, complex, and increasingly interdisciplinary records of scientific communication. While every such visualization assumes the existence of spatial structures within the system of science, new methods and tools are rarely linked to thorough reflection on the underlying spatial concepts. Meanwhile, geographic information science has adopted a view of geographic space as conceptualized through the duality of discrete objects and continuous fields. This paper argues that conceptualization of science has been dominated by a view of its constituent elements (e.g., authors, articles, journals, disciplines) as discrete objects. It is proposed that, like in geographic information science, alternative concepts could be used for the same phenomenon. For example, one could view an author as either a discrete object at a specific location or as a continuous field occupying all of a discipline. It is further proposed that this duality of spatial concepts can extend to the methods by which low-dimensional geometric models of high-dimensional scientific spaces are created and used. This can result in new methods revealing different kinds of insights. This is demonstrated by a juxtaposition of two visualizations of an author's intellectual evolution on the basis of either a discrete or continuous conceptualization.

Suggested Citation

  • Skupin, André, 2009. "Discrete and continuous conceptualizations of science: Implications for knowledge domain visualization," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 233-245.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:3:y:2009:i:3:p:233-245
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157709000261
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James A. Wise, 1999. "The ecological approach to text visualization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(13), pages 1224-1233.
    2. Howard D. White, 2001. "Author-centered bibliometrics through CAMEOs: Characterizations automatically made and edited online," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(3), pages 607-637, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. An, Lu & Yu, Chuanming & Li, Gang, 2014. "Visual topical analysis of Chinese and American Library and Information Science research institutions," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 217-233.
    2. Frenken, Koen & Hardeman, Sjoerd & Hoekman, Jarno, 2009. "Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 222-232.
    3. Irena Sajovic & Bojana Boh Podgornik, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Visualizations in Computer Graphics: A Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    4. Debnath, Ramit & darby, Sarah & Bardhan, Ronita & Mohaddes, Kamiar & Sunikka-Blank, Minna, 2020. "A nested computational social science approach for deep-narrative analysis in energy policy research," SocArXiv hvcb5, Center for Open Science.
    5. Cobo, M.J. & López-Herrera, A.G. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F., 2011. "An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 146-166.
    6. Meyer, Eric T. & Schroeder, Ralph, 2009. "Untangling the web of e-Research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 246-260.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    2. Omar Hernando Avila-Poveda, 2014. "Technical report: the trend of author compound names and its implications for authorship identity identification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 833-846, October.
    3. Félix Moya-Anegón & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada & Victor Herrero-Solana & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Elena Corera-Álvarez & Francisco J. Munoz-Fernández, 2004. "A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(1), pages 129-145, September.
    4. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    5. Yue Guiling & Siti Aisyah Panatik & Mohammad Saipol Mohd Sukor & Noraini Rusbadrol & Li Cunlin, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    6. Hugo Baier-Fuentes & José M. Merigó & José Ernesto Amorós & Magaly Gaviria-Marín, 2019. "International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 385-429, June.
    7. Aaron W. Baur, 0. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    8. Aaron W. Baur, 2017. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 231-251, April.
    9. Howard D. White, 2004. "Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 60(1), pages 93-120, May.
    10. Zhigao Liu & Yimei Yin & Weidong Liu & Michael Dunford, 2015. "Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 135-158, April.
    11. Matthew Ward & Wei Peng & Xiaoning Wang, 2004. "Hierarchical visual data mining for large-scale data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 147-158, February.
    12. Byungun Yoon & Sungjoo Lee & Gwanghee Lee, 2010. "Development and application of a keyword-based knowledge map for effective R&D planning," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 803-820, December.
    13. Christopher McCarty & James W. Jawitz & Allison Hopkins & Alex Goldman, 2013. "Predicting author h-index using characteristics of the co-author network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(2), pages 467-483, August.
    14. Wang, Peiling & Su, Jing, 2021. "Post-publication expert recommendations in faculty opinions (F1000Prime): Recommended articles and citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    15. Feng Hu & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Junbin Gao & Ning Bin & Quan Chen, 2018. "An Empirical Study on Visualizing the Intellectual Structure and Hotspots of Big Data Research from a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Bar-Ilan, Judit & Levene, Mark & Lin, Ayelet, 2007. "Some measures for comparing citation databases," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 26-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:3:y:2009:i:3:p:233-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.