IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v12y2018i3p842-857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach to explore the knowledge transition path in the evolution of science & technology: From the biology of restriction enzymes to their application in biotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Xiaojun
  • Rousseau, Ronald

Abstract

In this contribution, we develop a new approach to explore the process of knowledge transition from discovery-oriented science to technological fields, via applications-oriented research, including a mediator set. This trajectory is referred to as the D-A-T trajectory. It is shown how it can be constructed and measures are proposed to characterize the relational strength among different environments (discovery oriented research, applications-oriented research and patents) and the speed of evolution. Our approach is illustrated by a case study of three fundamental restriction enzymes articles. Among other results we found that 387 patents cited 124 of the 988 articles (a share of 12.55%) in the mediator set. Defining the non-patent references (NPR) transition rate as the number of citing patents divided by the number of articles in the mediator set yields a value 0.392. Our results suggest that the D-A-T path acts as a backbone and reveals important “invisible contributions” of an original scientific work during its evolution from discovery oriented research to outside academia. Our contribution provides a useful tool for bridging the existing gap in detecting the transition of knowledge between science and technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Xiaojun & Rousseau, Ronald, 2018. "A new approach to explore the knowledge transition path in the evolution of science & technology: From the biology of restriction enzymes to their application in biotechnology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 842-857.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:842-857
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157718301718
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werner Marx & Lutz Bornmann & Andreas Barth & Loet Leydesdorff, 2014. "Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(4), pages 751-764, April.
    2. Alberto Gherardini & Alberto Nucciotti, 2017. "Yesterday’s giants and invisible colleges of today. A study on the ‘knowledge transfer’ scientific domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 255-271, July.
    3. Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2005. "Market Value and Patent Citations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(1), pages 16-38, Spring.
    4. Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans & Katy Börner, 2005. "Mapping the backbone of science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 64(3), pages 351-374, August.
    5. Hu, Xiaojun & Rousseau, Ronald, 2016. "Scientific influence is not always visible: The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 1079-1091.
    6. Wolfgang Glänzel & Martin Meyer, 2003. "Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 415-428, October.
    7. Eugene Garfield & A. I. Pudovkin & V. S. Istomin, 2003. "Why do we need algorithmic historiography?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(5), pages 400-412, March.
    8. Van Looy, Bart & Landoni, Paolo & Callaert, Julie & van Pottelsberghe, Bruno & Sapsalis, Eleftherios & Debackere, Koenraad, 2011. "Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 553-564, May.
    9. Hu, Xiaojun & Rousseau, Ronald & Chen, Jin, 2011. "On the definition of forward and backward citation generations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 27-36.
    10. Mathieu-Joël Gervais & Caroline Marion & Christian Dagenais & François Chiocchio & Nathalie Houlfort, 2016. "Dealing with the complexity of evaluating knowledge transfer strategies: Guiding principles for developing valid instruments," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 62-69.
    11. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau & Jin Chen, 2012. "Structural indicators in citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 451-460, May.
    12. Robert J. W. Tijssen & Jos Winnink, 2016. "Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 2181-2194, December.
    13. Grant Lewison & Isla Rippon & Steven Wooding, 2005. "Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 5-14, April.
    14. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau & Jin Chen, 2012. "A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(9), pages 1834-1842, September.
    15. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau, 2017. "Nobel Prize winners 2016: Igniting or sparking foundational publications?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 1053-1063, February.
    16. Marc Luwel & Erik van Wijk, 2015. "The ‘translational’ effect in medical journals: Bridging the gap?," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 19-29.
    17. Kuan, Chung-Huei & Huang, Mu-Hsuan & Chen, Dar-Zen, 2018. "Missing links: Timing characteristics and their implications for capturing contemporaneous technological developments," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 259-270.
    18. Martin Meyer, 2006. "Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy: The case of a small economy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(2), pages 425-439, February.
    19. Yuxian Liu & Ronald Rousseau, 2010. "Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations: A case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(2), pages 340-351, February.
    20. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau & Jin Chen, 2012. "A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(9), pages 1834-1842, September.
    21. Ji-ping Gao & Kun Ding & Li Teng & Jie Pang, 2012. "Hybrid documents co-citation analysis: making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(2), pages 459-471, November.
    22. Anthony F. J. Raan, 2017. "Sleeping beauties cited in patents: Is there also a dormitory of inventions?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1123-1156, March.
    23. Yuxian Liu & Ronald Rousseau, 2010. "Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations: A case study using ESI‐fields as unit of diffusion," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(2), pages 340-351, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Lascialfari & Marie-Benoît Magrini & Guillaume Cabanac, 2022. "Unpacking research lock-in through a diachronic analysis of topic cluster trajectories in scholarly publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6165-6189, November.
    2. Yasuhiro Yamashita, 2020. "An attempt to identify technologically relevant papers based on their references," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1783-1800, November.
    3. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau & Sandra Rousseau, 2019. "Does Environmental Economics lead to patentable research?," Papers 1905.02875, arXiv.org.
    4. Ba, Zhichao & Liang, Zhentao, 2021. "A novel approach to measuring science-technology linkage: From the perspective of knowledge network coupling," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    5. Xu, Haiyun & Yue, Zenghui & Pang, Hongshen & Elahi, Ehsan & Li, Jing & Wang, Lu, 2022. "Integrative model for discovering linked topics in science and technology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    6. Xiaoli Wang & Yun Liu & Lingdi Chen & Yifan Zhang, 2022. "Correlation Monitoring Method and model of Science-Technology-Industry in the AI Field: A Case of the Neural Network," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    7. Xian Li & Dangzhi Zhao & Xiaojun Hu, 2020. "Gatekeepers in knowledge transfer between science and technology: an exploratory study in the area of gene editing," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1261-1277, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyu, Haihua & Bu, Yi & Zhao, Zhenyue & Zhang, Jiarong & Li, Jiang, 2022. "Citation bias in measuring knowledge flow: Evidence from the web of science at the discipline level," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    2. Jiang, Xiaorui & Zhuge, Hai, 2019. "Forward search path count as an alternative indirect citation impact indicator," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    3. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau & Jin Chen, 2012. "Structural indicators in citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 451-460, May.
    4. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    5. Adam B. Jaffe & Gaétan de Rassenfosse, 2017. "Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(6), pages 1360-1374, June.
    6. Ronald Rousseau & Xiaojun Hu, 2018. "Under-cited influential work by Eugene Garfield," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 651-657, February.
    7. Hu, Xiaojun & Rousseau, Ronald, 2016. "Scientific influence is not always visible: The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 1079-1091.
    8. Pan, Xuelian & Yan, Erjia & Cui, Ming & Hua, Weina, 2018. "Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 481-493.
    9. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2022. "Effects of the quality of science on the initial public offering of university spinoffs: evidence from Japan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4439-4455, August.
    10. Jiancheng Guan & Wenjia Zhu, 2014. "How knowledge diffuses across countries: a case study in the field of management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2129-2144, March.
    11. Xu, Haiyun & Winnink, Jos & Yue, Zenghui & Liu, Ziqiang & Yuan, Guoting, 2020. "Topic-linked innovation paths in science and technology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    12. JinHyo Joseph Yun & EuiSeob Jeong & JinSeu Park, 2016. "Network Analysis of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Fernández, Ana María & Ferrándiz, Esther & Medina, Jennifer, 2022. "The diffusion of energy technologies. Evidence from renewable, fossil, and nuclear energy patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Guijie Zhang & Guang Yu & Yuqiang Feng & Luning Liu & Zhenhua Yang, 2017. "Improving the publication delay model to characterize the patent granting process," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 621-637, May.
    15. Xu, Haiyun & Yue, Zenghui & Pang, Hongshen & Elahi, Ehsan & Li, Jing & Wang, Lu, 2022. "Integrative model for discovering linked topics in science and technology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    16. Wang, Jue & Zhang, Liwei, 2018. "Proximal advantage in knowledge diffusion: The time dimension," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 858-867.
    17. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau, 2015. "A simple approach to describe a company’s innovative activities and their technological breadth," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1401-1411, February.
    18. Zhou, Lei & Xiao, Wen & Yan, Na, 2023. "International comparative research on the relevance of science and technology and the innovation ability of the rare earth industry-from the perspective of technology-industry mapping based on patent ," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    19. Wang, Jean J. & Ye, Fred Y., 2021. "Probing into the interactions between papers and patents of new CRISPR/CAS9 technology: A citation comparison," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    20. Lee, Won Sang & Han, Eun Jin & Sohn, So Young, 2015. "Predicting the pattern of technology convergence using big-data technology on large-scale triadic patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 317-329.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:842-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.