IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v34y1993i1-2p115-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

U.S. technology and the specific-factors model

Author

Listed:
  • Kohli, Ulrich

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kohli, Ulrich, 1993. "U.S. technology and the specific-factors model," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-2), pages 115-136, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:34:y:1993:i:1-2:p:115-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022-1996(93)90069-A
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Makoto Tawada & Nobuhito Suga & Akihiko Yanase, 2022. "Government, trade and comparative advantage, revisited," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 1135-1165, May.
    2. Guillo, Maria Dolores & Perez-Sebastian, Fidel, 2007. "The curse and blessing of fixed specific factors in small-open economies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 58-78, January.
    3. Ulrich Kohli & Jean-Marc Natal, 2014. "The real exchange rate and the structure of aggregate production," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Ulrich Kohli, 2001. "Sanyal and Jones on trade in middle products," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 39-63.
    5. Chihiro Shimizu & Erwin Diewert & Koji Nomura, 2024. "Estimating Flexible Functional Forms using Macroeconomic Data," Working Papers e206, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    6. Feng, Guohua & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Productivity trends in U.S. manufacturing: Evidence from the NQ and AIM cost functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 281-311, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:34:y:1993:i:1-2:p:115-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505552 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.