IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v96y2010i1p1-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A canary in the coal mine: Documenting citizenship and identity in the State of Massachusetts

Author

Listed:
  • Kwong, Richard M.
  • Miller, Edward Alan

Abstract

Objectives The U.S. federal government requires original documentation of citizenship and identity for applicants to qualify for coverage under Medicaid. The purpose of this investigation is to identify what challenges one state Medicaid agency has faced when implementing this requirement; and to identify what strategies this agency and other interested parties (e.g., providers, community advocates) adopted to help overcome them.Methods The setting for this study is MassHealth, the Medicaid agency for the State of Massachusetts. Data derive from archival documents, direct observation, and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including state officials, provider agencies, community health centers, and beneficiary advocates.Results While MassHealth has met several of the implementation benchmarks put forth in federal regulations and guidance letters, the agency has fallen short in several respects. This includes assisting applicants seeking to enroll in MassHealth and maintaining a seamless documentation submission process. The result has been an increase in application processing time and misinterpretations in the MassHealth community; for example, that legal immigrants should not apply for coverage even though the new requirement does not affect them. Assuming a prominent role in informing and assisting MassHealth applicants has been providers and community-based organizations. Consumer advocacy groups have also worked to streamline the process for demonstrating citizenship and identity. Synergies have been formed between MassHealth and these other organizations as well.Conclusions Findings suggest a number of lessons for state Medicaid agencies wishing to address the challenges posed by federal requirements to demonstrate citizenship and identity. These include working to ensure the readability, comprehension and non-English translation of materials provided to program applicants. It also includes strengthening the document handling process and forming partnerships with providers, beneficiary advocates, and other community organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwong, Richard M. & Miller, Edward Alan, 2010. "A canary in the coal mine: Documenting citizenship and identity in the State of Massachusetts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 1-6, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:96:y:2010:i:1:p:1-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)00334-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Alan Miller & Jane Banaszak-Holl, 2005. "Cognitive and Normative Determinants of State Policymaking Behavior: Lessons from the Sociological Institutionalism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 191-216, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raluca Irina CLIPA & Ionel BOSTAN & Flavian CLIPA & Ionut POPESCU, 2018. "A Socio-Historical Excursus in the Approach of Institutionalism," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Economice si Administrative/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Economical and Administrative Sciences, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 15-23, March.
    2. Miller, Edward Alan & Wang, Lili, 2009. "The influence of national policy change on subnational policymaking: Medicaid nursing facility reimbursement in the American states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 1926-1934, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:96:y:2010:i:1:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.