IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v92y2009i2-3p197-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the workplace-smoking ban eliminate differences in risk for environmental tobacco smoke exposure at work?

Author

Listed:
  • Verdonk-Kleinjan, Wendy M.I.
  • Knibbe, Ronald A.
  • Tan, Frans E.S.
  • Willemsen, Marc C.
  • de Groot, Henk N.
  • de Vries, Hein

Abstract

Objectives A workplace-smoking ban in the Netherlands was introduced on January 1, 2004. Before the ban male and low educated employees were at higher risk for exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Effective implementation of the ban should result not only in an overall decline of exposure, but also in the disappearance of systematic differences in exposure between subgroups of employees.Methods Data from a Dutch continuous Internet survey were used. From July 2003 through June 2005, 200 respondents were randomly selected each week. The sample consisted of 11,291 non-smoking, working respondents, aged 16-65 years.Results ETS exposure decreased among all employees and among subgroups at higher risk before the ban. However, also after the ban, males and low educated employees were still most likely to be exposed to ETS.Conclusions The workplace-smoking ban was effective in reducing ETS exposure among employees. However, after the ban still 52.2% of non-smoking workers reported to be exposed. We did not find the expected stronger effect among employees who were at higher risk. Both before and after implementation of the ban, males and lower educated employees were about two times more likely to be exposed to ETS.

Suggested Citation

  • Verdonk-Kleinjan, Wendy M.I. & Knibbe, Ronald A. & Tan, Frans E.S. & Willemsen, Marc C. & de Groot, Henk N. & de Vries, Hein, 2009. "Does the workplace-smoking ban eliminate differences in risk for environmental tobacco smoke exposure at work?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(2-3), pages 197-202, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:92:y:2009:i:2-3:p:197-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)00079-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmons, K.M. & Abrams, D.B. & Marshall, R.J. & Etzel, R.A. & Novotny, T.E. & Marcus, B.H. & Kane, M.E., 1992. "Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in naturalistic settings," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(1), pages 24-28.
    2. Bonomo, Vittorio A & Johnson, Dana J & Thompson, G Rodney, 1995. "The Impact of the," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 30(1), pages 23-40, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilia Krakowiak & Katarzyna Sygit & Marian Sygit & Elżbieta Cipora & Jan Krakowiak, 2020. "Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) among Employees of Hospitality Venues in the Light of Changes in Anti-Tobacco Legislation in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Beomsoo Kim, 2009. "The Impact of the Workplace Smoking Ban in Korea," Discussion Paper Series 0908, Institute of Economic Research, Korea University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashleigh Shelby Rosette & Shirli Kopelman & JeAnna Lanza Abbott, 2014. "Good Grief! Anxiety Sours the Economic Benefits of First Offers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 629-647, May.
    2. Boris Rumanko & Zuzana Lušňáková & Monika Moravanská & Mária Šajbidorová, 2021. "Succession as a Risk Process in the Survival of a Family Business—Case of Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Claudio Agostini & Mariel C. Siravegna, 2009. "Efectos de la Exención Tributaria a las Ganancias de Capital en el Precio de las Acciones en Chile," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv233, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    4. Olivier Brossard & Stéphanie Lavigne & Mustafa Erdem Sakinç, 2013. "Ownership structures and R&D in Europe: the good institutional investors, the bad and ugly impatient shareholders," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(4), pages 1031-1068, August.
    5. Juin-Jen Chang & Ching-Chong Lai & Ping Wang, 2010. "Casino regulations and economic welfare," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 43(3), pages 1058-1085, August.
    6. James B. Davies, 1995. "Distributional Effects of the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption: Single vs. Multi-Year Analysis," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 21(s1), pages 159-173, November.
    7. van de Walle, Dominique & Gunewardena, Dileni, 1998. "How dirty are"quick and dirty"methods of project appraisal?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1908, The World Bank.
    8. Ingmar Geiger, 2014. "Media Effects on the Formation of Negotiator Satisfaction: The Example of Face-to-Face and Text Based Electronically Mediated Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 735-763, July.
    9. Juin-Jen Chang & Ching-Chong Lai & Ping Wang, 2017. "A Tale of Two Cities: Cross-Border Casino Competition Between Detroit and Windsor," NBER Working Papers 23969, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Sascha Alavi & Johannes Habel & Marco Schwenke & Christian Schmitz, 2020. "Price negotiating for services: elucidating the ambivalent effects on customers’ negotiation aspirations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 165-185, March.
    11. Jaime Ramirez-Fernandez & Jimena Y. Ramirez-Marin & Lourdes Munduate, 2018. "I Expected More from You: The Influence of Close Relationships and Perspective Taking on Negotiation Offers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 85-105, February.
    12. Karina Lloyd & Diana Boer & Joshua Keller & Sven Voelpel, 2015. "Is My Boss Really Listening to Me? The Impact of Perceived Supervisor Listening on Emotional Exhaustion, Turnover Intention, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 509-524, September.
    13. Lake, Amy & Deller, Steven, 1996. "The Socioeconomic Impacts of a Native American Casino," Staff Papers 200584, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    14. Michael Ahearne & Yashar Atefi & Son K. Lam & Mohsen Pourmasoudi, 2022. "The future of buyer–seller interactions: a conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 22-45, January.
    15. Parvin Sultana & Paul Thompson & Colin Green, 2008. "Can England Learn Lessons from Bangladesh in Introducing Participatory Floodplain Management?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(3), pages 357-376, March.
    16. Günther, C.C.A. & Rikvold, P.A. & Novotny, M.A., 1994. "Application of a constrained-transfer-matrix method to metastability in the d = 2 Ising ferromagnet," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 194-229.
    17. Gary C. Anders, 1998. "Indian Gaming: Financial and Regulatory Issues," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 556(1), pages 98-108, March.
    18. Paul, Eugene, 0. "The Realities Of Agricultural Policy - A Producer Persepective," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    19. Goldberg, Abbie E. & McCormick, Nora & Frost, Reihonna & Moyer, April, 2021. "Reconciling realities, adapting expectations, and reframing “success”: Adoptive parents respond to their children’s academic interests, challenges, and achievement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    20. Van Poucke, Dirk & Buelens, Marc, 2002. "Predicting the outcome of a two-party price negotiation: Contribution of reservation price, aspiration price and opening offer," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 67-76, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:92:y:2009:i:2-3:p:197-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.