IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v124y2020i4p446-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reviving clinical governance? A qualitative study of the impact of professional regulatory reform on clinical governance in healthcare organisations in England

Author

Listed:
  • Price, Tristan
  • Tredinnick-Rowe, John
  • Walshe, Kieran
  • Tazzyman, Abigail
  • Ferguson, Jane
  • Boyd, Alan
  • Archer, Julian
  • Bryce, Marie

Abstract

Until recently, processes of professional regulation and organisational clinical governance in the UK have been largely separate. However, the introduction of medical revalidation in 2012 means that all doctors have to demonstrate periodically to the regulator that they are up to date and fit to practise, and as part of this process doctors must engage with clinical governance activities in the organisations in which they work.

Suggested Citation

  • Price, Tristan & Tredinnick-Rowe, John & Walshe, Kieran & Tazzyman, Abigail & Ferguson, Jane & Boyd, Alan & Archer, Julian & Bryce, Marie, 2020. "Reviving clinical governance? A qualitative study of the impact of professional regulatory reform on clinical governance in healthcare organisations in England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 446-453.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:124:y:2020:i:4:p:446-453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851020300130
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fenton, Laura & Salter, Brian, 2009. "Competition and compromise in negotiating the new governance of medical performance: the clinical governance and revalidation policies in the UK," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 283-303, July.
    2. Bryce, Marie & Luscombe, Kayleigh & Boyd, Alan & Tazzyman, Abigail & Tredinnick-Rowe, John & Walshe, Kieran & Archer, Julian, 2018. "Policing the profession? Regulatory reform, restratification and the emergence of Responsible Officers as a new locus of power in UK medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 98-105.
    3. Dixon-Woods, Mary & Yeung, Karen & Bosk, Charles L., 2011. "Why is UK medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving “bad apple” doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(10), pages 1452-1459.
    4. Archer, Julian & Nunn, Suzanne & Regan de Bere, Sam, 2017. "The McDonaldization of appraisal? Doctors’ views of the early impacts of medical revalidation in the United Kingdom," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(9), pages 994-1000.
    5. Salter, Brian, 2007. "Governing UK medical performance: A struggle for policy dominance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 263-275, August.
    6. Dodds, Anneliese & Kodate, Naonori, 2012. "Understanding institutional conversion: the case of the National Reporting and Learning System," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 117-139, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Marques & Zélia Serrasqueiro & Fernanda Nogueira, 2021. "Managers’ Competences in Private Hospitals for Investment Decisions during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Ming-Lang Tseng & Phan Anh Tan & Kuo-Jui Wu & Remen Chun-Wei Lin & Nitcha Todumrongkul & Patrapapar Juladacha & Gabriella Christianti, 2020. "Sustainable Total Resource Management in Thailand Healthcare Industry under Uncertain Situations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryce, Marie & Luscombe, Kayleigh & Boyd, Alan & Tazzyman, Abigail & Tredinnick-Rowe, John & Walshe, Kieran & Archer, Julian, 2018. "Policing the profession? Regulatory reform, restratification and the emergence of Responsible Officers as a new locus of power in UK medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 98-105.
    2. Michał Krawczyk & Krzysztof Szczygielski, 2019. "Do professions curb free-riding? An experiment," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 361-376, June.
    3. James Arthur & Stephen R. Earl & Aidan P. Thompson & Joseph W. Ward, 2021. "The Value of Character-Based Judgement in the Professional Domain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 293-308, March.
    4. John Martyn Chamberlain, 2010. "Portfolio-Based Performance Appraisal for Doctors: A Case of Paperwork Compliance," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(1), pages 68-76, February.
    5. McGivern, Gerry & Nzinga, Jacinta & English, Mike, 2017. "‘Pastoral practices’ for quality improvement in a Kenyan clinical network," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 115-122.
    6. Ong, Bie Nio & Morden, Andrew & Brooks, Lauren & Porcheret, Mark & Edwards, John J. & Sanders, Tom & Jinks, Clare & Dziedzic, Krysia, 2014. "Changing policy and practice: Making sense of national guidelines for osteoarthritis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 101-109.
    7. Szczygielski, Krzysztof, 2022. "A model of competitive self-regulation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Jane Hendy & Danielle A. Tucker, 2021. "Public Sector Organizational Failure: A Study of Collective Denial in the UK National Health Service," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(4), pages 691-706, September.
    9. Levi, Baruch & Zehavi, Amos & Chinitz, David, 2018. "Taking the measure of the profession: Physician associations in the measurement age," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 746-754.
    10. Jones, Lorelei & Fulop, Naomi, 2021. "The role of professional elites in healthcare governance: Exploring the work of the medical director," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Abigail Tazzyman & Marie Bryce & Jane Ferguson & Kieran Walshe & Alan Boyd & Tristan Price & John Tredinnick‐Rowe, 2019. "Reforming regulatory relationships: The impact of medical revalidation on doctors, employers, and the General Medical Council in the United Kingdom," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 593-608, December.
    12. Byrne Catherine, 2016. "Ready or not? Statutory registration, regulation and continuing professional development for social care workers in Ireland," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 64(2), pages 9-29, August.
    13. Dewan, Yasir, 2019. "Corporate crime and punishment : The role of status and ideology," Other publications TiSEM 08d87b94-7449-4a1f-a3ae-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Tarrant, Carolyn & Leslie, Myles & Bion, Julian & Dixon-Woods, Mary, 2017. "A qualitative study of speaking out about patient safety concerns in intensive care units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 8-15.
    15. Hunter, Benjamin M. & Murray, Susan F. & Marathe, Shweta & Chakravarthi, Indira, 2022. "Decentred regulation: The case of private healthcare in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Spendlove, Zoey, 2018. "Medical revalidation as professional regulatory reform: Challenging the power of enforceable trust in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 64-71.
    17. Guillemin, Marilys & Archer, Julian & Nunn, Suzanne & de Bere, Samantha Regan, 2014. "Revalidation: Patients or process? Analysis using visual data," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 128-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:124:y:2020:i:4:p:446-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.