IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v122y2018i9p1028-1034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Centralisation of cancer surgery and the impact on patients’ travel burden

Author

Listed:
  • Versteeg, S.E.
  • Ho, V.K.Y.
  • Siesling, S.
  • Varkevisser, M.

Abstract

Recent years have seen increasing trends towards centralisation of complex medical procedures, including cancer surgery. The impact of these trends on patients’ travel burden is often ignored. This study charts the effects of different scenarios of centralising surgery on the travel burden for patients with cancer of the digestive tract, particularly among vulnerable patient groups. Our analyses include all surgically treated Dutch patients with colorectal, stomach or oesophageal cancer diagnosed in 2012–2013. After determining each patient’s actual travel burden, simulations explored the impact of continued centralisation of cancer surgery under four hypothetical scenarios. Compared to patients’ actual travelling, simulated travel distances under relatively ‘conservative’ scenarios did not necessarily increase, most likely due to current hospital bypassing. Using multivariable regression analyses, as a first exercise, it is examined whether the potential effects on travel burden differ across patient groups. For some cancer types, under more extreme scenarios increases in travel distances are significantly higher for older patients and those with a low SES. Given the potential impact on vulnerable patients’ travel burden, our analysis suggests a thorough consideration of non-clinical effects of centralisation in health policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Versteeg, S.E. & Ho, V.K.Y. & Siesling, S. & Varkevisser, M., 2018. "Centralisation of cancer surgery and the impact on patients’ travel burden," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(9), pages 1028-1034.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:9:p:1028-1034
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851018302173
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kobayashi, Daisuke & Otsubo, Tetsuya & Imanaka, Yuichi, 2015. "The effect of centralization of health care services on travel time and its equality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 298-306.
    2. Schut, Frederik T. & Varkevisser, Marco, 2017. "Competition policy for health care provision in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 126-133.
    3. Mesman, Roos & Faber, Marjan J. & Berden, Bart J.J.M. & Westert, Gert P., 2017. "Evaluation of minimum volume standards for surgery in the Netherlands (2003–2017): A successful policy?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1263-1273.
    4. Poeran, Jashvant & Borsboom, Gerard J.J.M. & de Graaf, Johanna P. & Birnie, Erwin & Steegers, Eric A.P. & Mackenbach, Johan P. & Bonsel, Gouke J., 2014. "Does centralisation of acute obstetric care reduce intrapartum and first-week mortality? An empirical study of over 1 million births in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 28-38.
    5. Office of Health Economics, 2007. "The Economics of Health Care," For School 001490, Office of Health Economics.
    6. Varkevisser, Marco & van der Geest, Stéphanie A. & Schut, Frederik T., 2012. "Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 371-378.
    7. Mesman, Roos & Westert, Gert P. & Berden, Bart J.M.M. & Faber, Marjan J., 2015. "Why do high-volume hospitals achieve better outcomes? A systematic review about intermediate factors in volume–outcome relationships," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 1055-1067.
    8. Marco Varkevisser & Stéphanie Geest, 2007. "Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 8(3), pages 287-295, September.
    9. Ho, Vivian & Town, Robert J. & Heslin, Martin J., 2007. "Regionalization versus competition in complex cancer surgery," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 51-71, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mensen, Anne, 2022. "Concentration of hospital capacities and patients' access to care," Ruhr Economic Papers 952, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    2. Paula Manchon-Walsh & Luisa Aliste & Josep M. Borràs & Cristina Coll-Ortega & Joan Casacuberta & Cristina Casanovas-Guitart & Montse Clèries & Sergi Cruz & Àlex Guarga & Anna Mompart & Antoni Planella, 2022. "Socioeconomic Status and Distance to Reference Centers for Complex Cancer Diseases: A Source of Health Inequalities? A Population Cohort Study Based on Catalonia (Spain)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Elisabetta Listorti & Arianna Alfieri & Erica Pastore, 2022. "Hospital volume allocation: integrating decision maker and patient perspectives," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 237-252, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina & Verzulli, Rossella, 2021. "Should I wait or should I go? Travelling versus waiting for better healthcare," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Suzanne Ruwaard & Rudy Douven, 2014. "Quality and hospital choice for cataract treatments: the winner takes most," CPB Discussion Paper 272.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Saghafian, Soroush & Hopp, Wallace J., 2017. "Can Public Reporting Cure Healthcare? The Role of Quality Transparency in Improving Patient-Provider Alignment," Working Paper Series rwp17-044, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Mennicken, Roman & Kolodziej, Ingo W.K. & Augurzky, Boris & Kreienberg, Rolf, 2014. "Concentration of gynaecology and obstetrics in Germany: Is comprehensive access at stake?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 396-406.
    5. Suzanne Ruwaard & Rudy Douven, 2014. "Quality and hospital choice for cataract treatments: the winner takes most," CPB Discussion Paper 272, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Giuseppe Moscelli & Luigi Siciliani & Nils Gutacker & Hugh Gravelle, 2016. "Location, quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from England 2002/3 - 2012/13," Working Papers 123cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    7. Visa Pitkänen & Ismo Linnosmaa, 2021. "Choice, quality and patients’ experience: evidence from a Finnish physiotherapy service," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 229-245, June.
    8. Peter Sivey, 2012. "The effect of waiting time and distance on hospital choice for English cataract patients," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 444-456, April.
    9. Mesman, Roos & Faber, Marjan J. & Berden, Bart J.J.M. & Westert, Gert P., 2017. "Evaluation of minimum volume standards for surgery in the Netherlands (2003–2017): A successful policy?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1263-1273.
    10. Puck Beukers & Ron Kemp & Marco Varkevisser, 2014. "Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(9), pages 927-936, December.
    11. Levaggi, Laura & Levaggi, Rosella, 2023. "Competition in the provision of hospital care: Are mixed markets a valid alternative?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Hugh Gravelle & Rita Santos & Luigi Siciliani & Rosalind Goudie, 2012. "Hospital Quality Competition Under Fixed Prices," Working Papers 080cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    13. Bes, Romy E. & Curfs, Emile C. & Groenewegen, Peter P. & de Jong, Judith D., 2017. "Selective contracting and channelling patients to preferred providers: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(5), pages 504-514.
    14. Corinna Hentschker & Roman Mennicken, 2015. "The Volume‐Outcome Relationship and Minimum Volume Standards – Empirical Evidence for Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 644-658, June.
    15. Soroush Saghafian & Wallace J. Hopp, 2020. "Can Public Reporting Cure Healthcare? The Role of Quality Transparency in Improving Patient–Provider Alignment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 71-92, January.
    16. Marco Varkevisser & Stéphanie Geest & Frederik Schut, 2010. "Assessing hospital competition when prices don’t matter to patients: the use of time-elasticities," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 43-60, March.
    17. Marius Huguet & Lionel Perrier & X Joutard & Isabelle Ray-Coquard, 2017. "What Underlies The Observed Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship?," Post-Print halshs-01653405, HAL.
    18. Xinyu Li & Christian Waibel, 2021. "Patients' free choice of physicians is not always good," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2751-2765, November.
    19. Domenico Lisi & Luigi Siciliani & Odd Rune Straume, 2020. "Hospital competition under pay‐for‐performance: Quality, mortality, and readmissions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 289-314, April.
    20. Philip H. Brown & Caroline Theoharides, 2009. "Health‐seeking behavior and hospital choice in China's New Cooperative Medical System," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(S2), pages 47-64, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:9:p:1028-1034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.