IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v122y2018i7p765-768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving quality of psychiatric care in Latvia by measuring patient experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Taube, Maris
  • Berzina-Novikova, Natalija

Abstract

In Latvia, as in many former Soviet Union countries, there used to be little priority given to systematic assessments of the quality of psychiatric care. Furthermore, using the experiences of patients as a measure of quality was unthinkable because psychiatric patients were seen as incapable of assessing quality of psychiatric services. Over the past few years, and facilitated by Latvia's progress along the route of Western democracy and participation in international organizations (EU, OECD), as well as funding support from the EU, several policy documents have been developed with the aim of improving healthcare quality. Simultaneously, several small-scale initiatives have emerged aiming at the promotion of quality of care, such as the quality award, and the quality comparison of psychiatric hospitals. Furthermore, the Psychiatric Inpatient Patient Experience Questionnaire for on-site measurement (PIPEQ-OS) has recently been adapted for use in Latvia. The first application of PIPEQ-OS in a psychiatric hospital in Riga reveals high patient responsiveness, interest and surprise about being asked to participate in the decision-making process regarding treatment and pharmaceutical choices. More widespread use of the PIPEQ-OS has considerable potential for (1) improving information about treatment shortcomings from the patients' perspective and (2) improving the treatment process by opening doors of cooperation with patients and changing deep-rooted paradigms.

Suggested Citation

  • Taube, Maris & Berzina-Novikova, Natalija, 2018. "Improving quality of psychiatric care in Latvia by measuring patient experiences," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 765-768.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:7:p:765-768
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851018300630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eric Badu & Anthony Paul O’Brien & Rebecca Mitchell & Akwasi Osei, 2020. "Mediation and moderation effects of health system structure and process on the quality of mental health services in Ghana – structural equation modelling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Semyonov-Tal, Keren, 2024. "Responsiveness of inpatient care and provision of dignity: Insights from a patient experience survey in Israel," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Juan Francisco Roldán-Merino & Manuel Tomás-Jiménez & Agneta Schröder & Lars-Olov Lundqvist & Montserrat Puig-Llobet & Antonio R. Moreno-Poyato & Marta Domínguez del Campo & Sara Sanchez-Balcells & Ma, 2023. "Quality in Psychiatric Care in the Community Mental Health Setting from the Perspective of Patients and Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:7:p:765-768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.