IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v121y2017i11p1124-1130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The governance of integrated health and social care in England since 2010: great expectations not met once again?

Author

Listed:
  • Exworthy, Mark
  • Powell, Martin
  • Glasby, Jon

Abstract

Integrating health and social care has long been a goal of policy-makers and practitioners. Yet, this aim has remained elusive, partly due to conflicting definitions and a weak evidence base. As part of a special edition exploring the use of the TAPIC (transparency, accountability, participation, integrity and capability) framework in different national contexts and inter-agency settings, this article examines the governance of integrated care in England since 2010, focusing on the extent to which thesefive governance attributes are applicable to integrated care in England. The plethora of English policy initiatives on integrated care (such as the ‘Better Care Fund’, personal health budgets, and ‘Sustainability and Transformation Plans’) mostly shows signs of continuity over time although the barriers to integrated care often persist. The article concludes that the contribution of integrated care to improved outcomes remains unclear and yet it remains a popular policy goal. Whilst some elements of the TAPIC framework fit less well than others to the case of integrated care, the case of integrated care can be better understood and explained through this lens.

Suggested Citation

  • Exworthy, Mark & Powell, Martin & Glasby, Jon, 2017. "The governance of integrated health and social care in England since 2010: great expectations not met once again?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(11), pages 1124-1130.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:11:p:1124-1130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851017301987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Mason & Maria Goddard & Helen Weatherly, 2014. "Financial Mechanisms for Integrating Funds for Health and Social Care: An Evidence Review," Working Papers 097cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Humphries, Richard, 2015. "Integrated health and social care in England – Progress and prospects," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(7), pages 856-859.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alonso, José M. & Andrews, Rhys, 2022. "Does vertical integration of health and social care organizations work? Evidence from Scotland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Kuili Zhang & Bing Ran, 2022. "Active Health Governance—A Conceptual Framework Based on a Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Lips, S.R. & Molenaar, J.M. & Schuitmaker-Warnaar, T.J., 2020. "Transforming maternity care: obstetric partnerships as a policy instrument for integration," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1245-1253.
    4. van Schalkwyk, May C.I. & Barlow, Pepita & Siles-Brügge, Gabriel & Jarman, Holly & Hervey, Tamara & McKee, Martin, 2021. "Brexit and trade policy: an analysis of the governance of UK trade policy and what it means for health and social justice," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110261, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moss, Charlie & Anselmi, Laura & Morciano, Marcello & Munford, Luke & Stokes, Jonathan & Sutton, Matt, 2023. "Analysing changes to the flow of public funding within local health and care systems: An adaptation of the System of Health Accounts framework to a local health system in England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Duminy, Lize & Ress, Vanessa & Wild, Eva-Maria, 2022. "Complex community health and social care interventions – Which features lead to reductions in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions? A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1206-1225.
    3. Li, Yan, 2022. "Social care for disabled elderly women in urban China: The roles of the community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Daniel Rippon & Andrew McDonnell & Michael Smith & Michael McCreadie & Mark Wetherell, 2020. "A grounded theory study on work related stress in professionals who provide health & social care for people who exhibit behaviours that challenge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Qian Sun & Mary Loveday & Saw Nwe & Nike Morris & Emily Boxall, 2023. "Green Social Prescribing in Practice: A Case Study of Walsall, UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Kendrick, Hannah & Mackenzie, Ewan, 2023. "Austerity and the shaping of the ‘waste watching’ health professional: A governmentality perspective on integrated care policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120265, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Lalani, Mirza & Bussu, Sonia & Marshall, Martin, 2020. "Understanding integrated care at the frontline using organisational learning theory: A participatory evaluation of multi-professional teams in East London," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    8. Wildman, John & McMeekin, Peter & Grieve, Eleanor & Briggs, Andrew, 2016. "Economic evaluation of integrated new technologies for health and social care: Suggestions for policy makers, users and evaluators," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 141-148.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:11:p:1124-1130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.