IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v119y2015i5p648-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reregulation of the Swedish pharmacy sector—A qualitative content analysis of the political rationale

Author

Listed:
  • Wisell, Kristin
  • Winblad, Ulrika
  • Sporrong, Sofia Kälvemark

Abstract

In 2009, a reregulation of the Swedish pharmacy sector took place, and a fundamental change in ownership and structure followed. The reregulation provides an opportunity to reveal the politicians’ views on pharmacies. The aim of this study was to explore and analyze the political arguments for the reregulation of the Swedish pharmacy sector in 2009. The method used was a qualitative content analysis of written political documents regarding the reregulation. The primary rationales for the reregulation were better availability, efficiency, price pressure, and safe usage of medicines. During the preparatory work, the rationales of diversity on the market and entrepreneurship were added, while the original rationales of efficiency, price pressure, and better usage of medicines were abandoned. The reform can be seen as a typical New Public Management reform influenced by the notion that private actors are better equipped to perform public activities. The results point to that the reform was done almost solely in order to introduce private ownership in the pharmacy sector, and was not initiated in order to solve any general problems, or to enhance patient outcomes of medicine use.

Suggested Citation

  • Wisell, Kristin & Winblad, Ulrika & Sporrong, Sofia Kälvemark, 2015. "Reregulation of the Swedish pharmacy sector—A qualitative content analysis of the political rationale," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 648-653.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:119:y:2015:i:5:p:648-653
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851015000925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lilja, John, 1987. "The nationalisation of the Swedish pharmacies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 423-429, January.
    2. Lluch, Maria & Kanavos, Panos, 2010. "Impact of regulation of Community Pharmacies on efficiency, access and equity. Evidence from the UK and Spain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(2-3), pages 245-254, May.
    3. Stolt, Ragnar & Blomqvist, Paula & Winblad, Ulrika, 2011. "Privatization of social services: Quality differences in Swedish elderly care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 560-567, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gallone, Emma Luisa & Ravetto Enri, Lorenzo & Pignata, Irene & Baratta, Francesca & Brusa, Paola, 2020. "The 2017 deregulation of pharmacies in Italy: Introducing non-pharmacist ownership," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1281-1286.
    2. Wisell, Kristin & Winblad, Ulrika & Kälvemark Sporrong, Sofia, 2019. "Diversity as salvation? – A comparison of the diversity rationale in the Swedish pharmacy ownership liberalization reform and the primary care choice reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(5), pages 457-461.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Akintayo & Niina Häkälä & Katja Ropponen & Elsa Paronen & Sari Rissanen, 2016. "Predictive Factors for Voluntary and/or Paid Work among Adults in their Sixties," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1387-1404, September.
    2. Claudia Goldin & Lawrence F. Katz, 2016. "A Most Egalitarian Profession: Pharmacy and the Evolution of a Family-Friendly Occupation," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(3), pages 705-746.
    3. Hjelmar, Ulf & Bhatti, Yosef & Petersen, Ole Helby & Rostgaard, Tine & Vrangbæk, Karsten, 2018. "Public/private ownership and quality of care: Evidence from Danish nursing homes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 41-49.
    4. Meinow, Bettina & Parker, Marti G. & Thorslund, Mats, 2011. "Consumers of eldercare in Sweden: The semblance of choice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1285-1289.
    5. Barbarisi, Ilaria & Bruno, Giuseppe & Diglio, Antonio & Elizalde, Javier & Piccolo, Carmela, 2019. "A spatial analysis to evaluate the impact of deregulation policies in the pharmacy sector: Evidence from the case of Navarre," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(11), pages 1108-1115.
    6. Linda Enroth & Mari Aaltonen & Jani Raitanen & Lily Nosraty & Marja Jylhä, 2018. "Does use of long-term care differ between occupational classes among the oldest old? Vitality 90 + Study," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 143-153, June.
    7. Ana Elena IOSIF, 2014. "Public - private interdependence: an effective tool in water supply services," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(33), pages 19-35, November.
    8. Gallone, Emma Luisa & Ravetto Enri, Lorenzo & Pignata, Irene & Baratta, Francesca & Brusa, Paola, 2020. "The 2017 deregulation of pharmacies in Italy: Introducing non-pharmacist ownership," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1281-1286.
    9. Vogler, Sabine & Habimana, Katharina & Arts, Danielle, 2014. "Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 311-327.
    10. Andrea Cintolesi & Andrea Riganti, 2022. "Liberalizing the opening of new pharmacies and hospitalizations," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1388, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    11. Reibling, Nadine & Ariaans, Mareike & Wendt, Claus, 2019. "Worlds of Healthcare: A Healthcare System Typology of OECD Countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(7), pages 611-620.
    12. Knutsson, Daniel & Tyrefors, Björn, 2020. "The Quality and Efficiency Between Public and Private Firms: Evidence from Ambulance Services," Working Paper Series 1365, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 01 Jul 2021.
    13. Barron, David N. & West, Elizabeth, 2017. "The quasi-market for adult residential care in the UK: Do for-profit, not-for-profit or public sector residential care and nursing homes provide better quality care?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 137-146.
    14. Jo, Wooyong & Nam, Hyoryung & Choi, Jeonghye, 2022. "Opening the OTC drug market: The effect of deregulation on retail pharmacy’s performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 847-866.
    15. Ana Moura & Pedro Pita Barros, 2020. "Entry and price competition in the over‐the‐counter drug market after deregulation: Evidence from Portugal," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(8), pages 865-877, August.
    16. Kališ, Richard, 2024. "From symbiosis to independence: Investigating changes in the relationship between general practitioners’ presence and pharmacies’ market size in Slovakia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Moura, Ana, 2021. "Essays in health economics," Other publications TiSEM c93abd22-fa4a-42a5-b172-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:119:y:2015:i:5:p:648-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.