IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v109y2013i2p113-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managed competition in the Netherlands—A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Heinemann, Stephanie
  • Leiber, Simone
  • Greß, Stefan

Abstract

In 2006, the Health Insurance Act changed Dutch health insurance by implementing managed competition, whereby the health insurance market is strongly regulated by the government. The aim of the study is to investigate key stakeholders’ opinions about effects of recent changes in Dutch healthcare policy, focussing upon three important requirements for successful managed competition: risk-adjustment, consumer choice and instruments for managed care.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinemann, Stephanie & Leiber, Simone & Greß, Stefan, 2013. "Managed competition in the Netherlands—A qualitative study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 113-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:109:y:2013:i:2:p:113-121
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851012002485
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boonen, Lieke H. H. M. & Schut, Frederik T., 2011. "Preferred providers and the credible commitment problem in health insurance: first experiences with the implementation of managed competition in the Dutch health care system," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 219-235, April.
    2. Wynand P. M. M. Van de Ven & Frederik T. Schut, 2009. "Managed competition in the Netherlands: still work‐in‐progress," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 253-255, March.
    3. Lieke H. H. M. Boonen & Frederik T. Schut & Xander Koolman, 2008. "Consumer channeling by health insurers: natural experiments with preferred providers in the Dutch pharmacy market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 299-316, March.
    4. Schut, Frederik T., 1992. "Workable competition in health care: Prospects for the Dutch design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1445-1455, December.
    5. Van de Ven, Wynand P. M. M., 2011. "Risk adjustment and risk equalization: what needs to be done?," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(01), pages 147-156, January.
    6. Frederik T. Schut & Wynand P. M. M. Van de Ven, 2005. "Rationing and competition in the Dutch health‐care system," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(S1), pages 59-74, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Botje, Daan & Klazinga, Niek S. & Wagner, Cordula, 2013. "To what degree is the governance of Dutch hospitals orientated towards quality in care? Does this really affect performance?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 134-141.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bes, Romy E. & Curfs, Emile C. & Groenewegen, Peter P. & de Jong, Judith D., 2017. "Selective contracting and channelling patients to preferred providers: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(5), pages 504-514.
    2. France R. M. Portrait & Onno van der Galiën & Bernard Van den Berg, 2016. "Measuring Healthcare Providers' Performances Within Managed Competition Using Multidimensional Quality and Cost Indicators," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 408-423, April.
    3. van der Hulst, Frank J.P. & Holst, Laurens & Brabers, Anne E.M. & de Jong, Judith D., 2022. "To what degree are health insurance enrollees in the Netherlands aware of the restrictive conditions attached to their policies?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 693-703.
    4. Thomson, Sarah & Busse, Reinhard & Crivelli, Luca & van de Ven, Wynand & Van de Voorde, Carine, 2013. "Statutory health insurance competition in Europe: A four-country comparison," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 209-225.
    5. Tsiachristas, Apostolos & Hipple-Walters, Bethany & Lemmens, Karin M.M. & Nieboer, Anna P. & Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P.M.H., 2011. "Towards integrated care for chronic conditions: Dutch policy developments to overcome the (financial) barriers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 122-132, July.
    6. van de Ven, Wynand P.M.M. & Beck, Konstantin & Buchner, Florian & Schokkaert, Erik & Schut, F.T. (Erik) & Shmueli, Amir & Wasem, Juergen, 2013. "Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in competitive healthcare markets: Are they fulfilled in Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 226-245.
    7. Westra, Daan & Angeli, Federica & Carree, Martin & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2017. "Understanding competition between healthcare providers: Introducing an intermediary inter-organizational perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 149-157.
    8. Parida Wubulihasimu & Werner Brouwer & Pieter van Baal, 2016. "The Impact of Hospital Payment Schemes on Healthcare and Mortality: Evidence from Hospital Payment Reforms in OECD Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(8), pages 1005-1019, August.
    9. J.A. Bikker & J.G.J. Bekooij, 2021. "Market forces in healthcare insurance: The impact of healthcare reform on regulated competition revisited," Working Papers 2104, Utrecht School of Economics.
    10. Mesman, Roos & Faber, Marjan J. & Berden, Bart J.J.M. & Westert, Gert P., 2017. "Evaluation of minimum volume standards for surgery in the Netherlands (2003–2017): A successful policy?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1263-1273.
    11. Puck Beukers & Ron Kemp & Marco Varkevisser, 2014. "Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(9), pages 927-936, December.
    12. Frank Eijkenaar & René C. J. A. van Vliet, 2014. "Performance Profiling in Primary Care," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(2), pages 192-205, February.
    13. Daniëlle Duijmelinck & Wynand Ven, 2014. "Choice of insurer for basic health insurance restricted by supplementary insurance," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(7), pages 737-746, September.
    14. Johannes Schoder & Peter Zweifel, 2008. "The Contribution of Managed Care to the Performance of Healthcare Systems - Evidence from Three Countries," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 144(III), pages 477-493, September.
    15. Groenewegen, Peter P. & Hansen, Johan & de Jong, Judith D., 2019. "Trust in times of health reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 281-287.
    16. Xu, Weiwei & van de Ven, Wynand P.M.M., 2013. "Consumer choice among Mutual Healthcare Purchasers: A feasible option for China?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 277-284.
    17. Conor Keegan & Conor Teljeur & Brian Turner & Steve Thomas, 2017. "Addressing Market Segmentation and Incentives for Risk Selection: How Well Does Risk Equalisation in the Irish Private Health Insurance Market Work?," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 48(1), pages 61-84.
    18. Tsiachristas, A. & Wallenburg, I. & Bond, C.M. & Elliot, R.F. & Busse, R. & van Exel, J. & Rutten-van Mölken, M.P. & de Bont, A., 2015. "Costs and effects of new professional roles: Evidence from a literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 1176-1187.
    19. Anne Mason & Maria Goddard, 2009. "Payment by results in mental health: A review of the international literature and an economic assessment of the approach in the English NHS," Working Papers 050cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    20. Hayen, Arthur P. & Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin, 2021. "Does the framing of patient cost-sharing incentives matter? the effects of deductibles vs. no-claim refunds," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:109:y:2013:i:2:p:113-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.