IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v101y2011i1p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The gradient in health inequalities among families and children: A review of evaluation frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Davies, John Kenneth
  • Sherriff, Nigel

Abstract

Public health policies and interventions that seek to tackle the social gradient in health need to be more adequately evaluated. The GRADIENT Project sets out to recommend public health policy options which effectively tackle health inequalities and address the gradient in health determinants among families and children in Europe. This work is underpinned by the development of a dedicated evaluation framework--a scheme that elaborates steps in a process of assessment which can act as a useful guide for decision makers. This paper presents the results from a narrative review, based on realist review principles, of 34 evaluation frameworks. It uses a set of analytical criteria, drawn from the EUHPID health development model, the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, and the wider literature on health inequalities, to analyse these frameworks. The findings reveal that no one suitable evaluation framework exists to evaluate whether policies and/or interventions targeting children and families reduce the health gradient. It is suggested that this work will be useful in assessing the complex nature of public health interventions and their evaluation. It will be used to develop an evaluation framework to guide decision makers to begin to understand the key drivers at each stage of the policy development and implementation cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Davies, John Kenneth & Sherriff, Nigel, 2011. "The gradient in health inequalities among families and children: A review of evaluation frameworks," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:1-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851010002769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glasgow, R.E. & Vogt, T.M. & Boles, S.M., 1999. "Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(9), pages 1322-1327.
    2. Wilfreda Thurston & Ardene Vollmann & Douglas Wilson & Gail MacKean & Roxanne Felix & Mary-Frances Wright, 2003. "Development and testing of a framework for assessing the effectiveness of health promotion," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 48(5), pages 301-316, October.
    3. Chen, Edith & Martin, Andrew D. & Matthews, Karen A., 2006. "Socioeconomic status and health: Do gradients differ within childhood and adolescence?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(9), pages 2161-2170, May.
    4. Henning Lohmann & Frauke H. Peter & Tine Rostgaard & Katharina Spiess, 2009. "Towards a Framework for Assessing Family Policies in the EU," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 88, OECD Publishing.
    5. Alec Irwin & Nicole Valentine & Chris Brown & Rene Loewenson & Orielle Solar & Hilary Brown & Theadora Koller & Jeanette Vega, 2006. "The Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Tackling the Social Roots of Health Inequities," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-1, May.
    6. Cornford, T & Doukidis, Gi & Forster, D, 1994. "Experience with a structure, process and outcome framework for evaluating an information system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 491-504, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuili Zhang & Bing Ran, 2022. "Active Health Governance—A Conceptual Framework Based on a Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chelsea M. Cooper & Mary Drake & Justine A. Kavle & Joyce Nyoni & Ruth Lemwayi & Lemmy Mabuga & Anne Pfitzer & Mary Makungu & Elizabeth Massawe & John George, 2021. "Implementing a Novel Facility-Community Intervention for Strengthening Integration of Infant Nutrition and Family Planning in Mara and Kagera, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Francisco Javier de la Garza Iga & Marinés Mejía Alvarez & Joshua D Cockroft & Julia Rabin & Ana Cordón & Dina Maria Elias Rodas & Maria del Pilar Grazioso & Maria Espinola & Christine O’Dea & Ch, 2023. "Using the project ECHO™ model to teach mental health topics in rural Guatemala: An implementation science-guided evaluation," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(8), pages 2031-2041, December.
    3. Green, Mark A., 2013. "The equalisation hypothesis and changes in geographical inequalities of age based mortality in England, 2002–2004 to 2008–2010," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 93-98.
    4. Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard-Gabriel Ceptureanu & Mihai Cristian Orzan & Irinel Marin, 2017. "Toward a Romanian NPOs Sustainability Model: Determinants of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Michelle Nichols & Ronald Teufel & Sarah Miller & Mohan Madisetti & Christine San Giovanni & Katherine Chike-Harris & Lacy Jones & Margaret Prentice & Kenneth Ruggiero & Teresa Kelechi, 2020. "Managing Asthma and Obesity Related Symptoms (MATADORS): An mHealth Intervention to Facilitate Symptom Self-Management among Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Floor A. van den Brand & Tessa Magnée & Lotte de Haan-Bouma & Cas Barendregt & Niels H. Chavannes & Onno C. P. van Schayck & Gera E. Nagelhout, 2019. "Implementation of Financial Incentives for Successful Smoking Cessation in Real-Life Company Settings: A Qualitative Needs Assessment among Employers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Currie, Melissa & King, Gillian & Rosenbaum, Peter & Law, Mary & Kertoy, Marilyn & Specht, Jacqueline, 2005. "A model of impacts of research partnerships in health and social services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 400-412, November.
    8. Guzmán, Azucena & Orellana, Katharine & Ortega, Mariana López & Robledo, Luis Miguel Gutiérrez & Castro, Sara Torres, 2024. "Introducing a multicomponent staff training intervention to reduce antipsychotic medication: Care home management pre and post intervention views of systemic impact, and preliminary RE-AIM evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Petra Boersma & Julia C M van Weert & Berno van Meijel & Rose‐Marie Dröes, 2017. "Implementation of the Veder contact method in daily nursing home care for people with dementia: a process analysis according to the RE‐AIM framework," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 436-455, February.
    10. Goode, Alison & Mavromaras, Kostas & zhu, Rong, 2014. "Family income and child health in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 152-165.
    11. Marsha L. Brierley & Lindsey R. Smith & Angel M. Chater & Daniel P. Bailey, 2022. "A-REST (Activity to Reduce Excessive Sitting Time): A Feasibility Trial to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in Police Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Katrien De Cocker & Greet Cardon & Jason A. Bennie & Tracy Kolbe-Alexander & Femke De Meester & Corneel Vandelanotte, 2018. "From Evidence-Based Research to Practice-Based Evidence: Disseminating a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Workplace Sitting Intervention through a Health Promotion Organisation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Bénédicte Apouey, 2016. "Child physical development in the UK: The imprint of time and socioeconomic status," Working Papers halshs-01364464, HAL.
    14. Khanam, Rasheda & Nghiem, Hong Son & Connelly, Luke B., 2009. "Child health and the income gradient: Evidence from Australia," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 805-817, July.
    15. Janet M. Boekhout & Brenda A. J. Berendsen & Denise A. Peels & Catherine A. W. Bolman & Lilian Lechner, 2018. "Evaluation of a Computer-Tailored Healthy Ageing Intervention to Promote Physical Activity among Single Older Adults with a Chronic Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Vanessa Bertuzzi & Michelle Semonella & Gianluca Castelnuovo & Gerhard Andersson & Giada Pietrabissa, 2022. "Synthesizing Stakeholders Perspectives on Online Psychological Interventions to Improve the Mental Health of the Italian Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Daniel Kuehnle, 2013. "The causal effect of family income on child health: A re-examination using an instrumental variables approach," Working Papers 133, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    18. Anne Case & Christina Paxson & Tom Vogl, 2006. "Socioeconomic status and health in childhood: A comment on Chen, Martin and Matthews (2006)," Working Papers 233, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing..
    19. Fabrizio Bernardi & Risto Conte Keivabu, 2023. "Poor air at school and educational inequalities by family socioeconomic status," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2023-014, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    20. Harriet Koorts & Adrian Bauman & Nancy Edwards & William Bellew & Wendy J. Brown & Mitch J. Duncan & David R. Lubans & Andrew J. Milat & Philip J. Morgan & Nicole Nathan & Andrew Searles & Karen Lee &, 2022. "Tensions and Paradoxes of Scaling Up: A Critical Reflection on Physical Activity Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.