IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/glofin/v35y2018icp106-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D investment and risk in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • da Silva, Raphael Braga
  • Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus
  • Pinto, Antonio Carlos Figueiredo
  • da Motta, Luiz Felipe Jacques

Abstract

This study evaluates whether the undervaluation of R&D firms, as observed in developed markets, is due to mispricing or to risk adjustment for innovative activity. Analyzing stocks listed on the São Paulo Stock Exchange from 2006 through the first half of 2014, we compare returns to portfolios of firms differing in industry-adjusted R&D intensity (IRDI), without and with controls for risk (modeled in two ways). Our results indicate that a long-short strategy of buying stock in high-IRDI firms and short-selling stock in low-IRDI firms provides a significant abnormal return of 4.78% per year without controls for risk; after various risk factors are controlled, the return rises to 5.16% or 5.28%, depending on how risk is modeled. These results suggest that investors undervalue companies that invest more than their industry's average in R&D, and that the abnormal returns cannot be attributed to systematic In fact, cross-sectional regressions show that firms with greater IRDI are less risky than those with low intensity, exhibiting lower future volatility in the three years after the R&D investment. In addition, using the number of analysts as a proxy for investor attention, we show that companies with high IRDI that also provide more information to the market about their innovation projects can mitigate approximately 40% of their potential undervaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • da Silva, Raphael Braga & Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus & Pinto, Antonio Carlos Figueiredo & da Motta, Luiz Felipe Jacques, 2018. "R&D investment and risk in Brazil," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 106-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:35:y:2018:i:c:p:106-114
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2017.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028316300904
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sophie Nivoix & Pascal Nguyen & Mikiharu Noma, 2010. "The valuation of R&D expenditures in Japan," Post-Print hal-00959068, HAL.
    2. Eli Amir & Yanling Guan & Gilad Livne, 2007. "The Association of R&D and Capital Expenditures with Subsequent Earnings Variability," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1‐2), pages 222-246, January.
    3. Pascal Nguyen & Sophie Nivoix & Mikiharu Noma, 2010. "The valuation of R&D expenditures in Japan," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(4), pages 899-920, December.
    4. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
    5. Lauren Cohen & Karl Diether & Christopher Malloy, 2013. "Misvaluing Innovation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(3), pages 635-666.
    6. Newey, Whitney & West, Kenneth, 2014. "A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 33(1), pages 125-132.
    7. Fama, Eugene F & MacBeth, James D, 1973. "Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 607-636, May-June.
    8. Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shiva, 2005. "The economic implications of corporate financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-3), pages 3-73, December.
    9. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    10. Hirshleifer, David & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Dongmei, 2013. "Innovative efficiency and stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 632-654.
    11. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    12. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:2:p:623-650 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. He, Jie (Jack) & Tian, Xuan, 2013. "The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 856-878.
    14. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    15. Louis K. C. Chan & Josef Lakonishok & Theodore Sougiannis, 2001. "The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(6), pages 2431-2456, December.
    16. Allan Eberhart & William Maxwell & Akhtar Siddique, 2008. "A Reexamination of the Tradeoff between the Future Benefit and Riskiness of R&D Increases," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 27-52, March.
    17. da Silva, Raphael Braga & Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus & Figueiredo, Antonio Carlos & da Motta, Luiz Felipe Jacques, 2015. "Innovative intensity and its impact on the performance of firms in Brazil," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Ding & Gang Chen, 2022. "How Do Innovation-Driven Policies Help Sports Firms Sustain Growth? The Mediating Role of R&D Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Kabir, Md Nurul & Rahman, Sohanur & Rahman, Md Arifur & Anwar, Mumtaheena, 2021. "Carbon emissions and default risk: International evidence from firm-level data," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Hirshleifer & Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li, 2018. "Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(7), pages 2553-2605.
    2. Chen, Sheng-Syan & Chen, Yan-Shing & Liang, Woan-lih & Wang, Yanzhi, 2020. "Public R&D spending and cross-sectional stock returns," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    3. Chan, Konan & Lin, Yueh-hsiang & Wang, Yanzhi, 2015. "The information content of R&D reductions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 131-155.
    4. Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li & Qin Li & Siew Hong Teoh & Kevin Tseng, 2022. "Valuation of New Trademarks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 257-279, January.
    5. da Silva, Raphael Braga & Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus & Figueiredo, Antonio Carlos & da Motta, Luiz Felipe Jacques, 2015. "Innovative intensity and its impact on the performance of firms in Brazil," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Heusel, Nicola & Mager, Ferdinand, 2023. "Pension funding and the cross section of stock returns - The case of Germany," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Stoffman, Noah & Woeppel, Michael & Yavuz, M. Deniz, 2022. "Small innovators: No risk, No return," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1).
    8. Lee, Charles M.C. & Sun, Stephen Teng & Wang, Rongfei & Zhang, Ran, 2019. "Technological links and predictable returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 76-96.
    9. Hirshleifer, David & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Dongmei, 2013. "Innovative efficiency and stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 632-654.
    10. Atilgan, Yigit & Bali, Turan G. & Demirtas, K. Ozgur & Gunaydin, A. Doruk, 2020. "Left-tail momentum: Underreaction to bad news, costly arbitrage and equity returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 725-753.
    11. Chan, Konan & Chen, Hung-Kun & Hong, Li-Hong & Wang, Yanzhi, 2015. "Stock market valuation of R&D expenditures—The role of corporate governance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 78-93.
    12. Leung, Woon Sau & Evans, Kevin P. & Mazouz, Khelifa, 2020. "The R&D anomaly: Risk or mispricing?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    13. Ince, Baris, 2022. "Liquidity components: Commonality in liquidity, underreaction, and equity returns," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Huang, Tao & Li, Junye & Wu, Fei & Zhu, Ning, 2022. "R&D information quality and stock returns," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    15. Turan G. Bali & Robert F. Engle & Yi Tang, 2017. "Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3760-3779, November.
    16. Tseng, Kevin, 2022. "Learning from the Joneses: Technology spillover, innovation externality, and stock returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    17. Oh, Jong-Min, 2017. "Absorptive capacity, technology spillovers, and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 146-164.
    18. Xin Chen & Wei He & Libin Tao & Jianfeng Yu, 2023. "Attention and Underreaction-Related Anomalies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 636-659, January.
    19. Kent Daniel & David Hirshleifer & Lin Sun, 2020. "Short- and Long-Horizon Behavioral Factors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(4), pages 1673-1736.
    20. Andrew Ang & Assaf A. Shtauber & Paul C. Tetlock, 2013. "Asset Pricing in the Dark: The Cross-Section of OTC Stocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(12), pages 2985-3028.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; Risk; Research and development; Returns;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:35:y:2018:i:c:p:106-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620162 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.