IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v97y2018icp210-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and profitability potential for non-native Eucalyptus plantings in the southern USA

Author

Listed:
  • Stanturf, John A.
  • Young, Timothy M.
  • Perdue, James H.
  • Dougherty, Derek
  • Pigott, Michael
  • Guo, Zhimei
  • Huang, Xia

Abstract

Renewed interest in non-native Eucalyptus species for planting in the southern US has been spurred by projections suggesting they are more productive than the widely cultured Pinus species, by warming temperatures, and by attempts to identify frost-tolerant species as well as developing genetically modified Eucalyptus for frost tolerance. In addition to questions of environmental suitability, the economic viability of Eucalyptus is a significant hurdle to widespread adoption for commercial plantings. We sought to assess the potential obtainable yields and economic feasibility of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex. Maiden and E. benthamii Maiden et Cambage, two species suitable for the southern United States. Using the process-based growth model 3PG, we projected potential yields at the sub-county level for E. grandis in Florida where it is operationally grown and E. benthamii in USDA Plant Hardiness Zones 8a and 8b where it has shown tolerance to occasional low temperatures. The 3PG model estimated mean annual volume increment, inside bark (MAI) that was used to estimate land expectation value (LEV) and internal rate of return (IRR).

Suggested Citation

  • Stanturf, John A. & Young, Timothy M. & Perdue, James H. & Dougherty, Derek & Pigott, Michael & Guo, Zhimei & Huang, Xia, 2018. "Productivity and profitability potential for non-native Eucalyptus plantings in the southern USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 210-222.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:97:y:2018:i:c:p:210-222
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934118301394
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loisel, Patrice, 2014. "Impact of storm risk on Faustmann rotation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 191-198.
    2. Perdue, James H. & Stanturf, John A. & Young, Timothy M. & Huang, Xia & Dougherty, Derek & Pigott, Michael & Guo, Zhimei, 2017. "Profitability potential for Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) short-rotation bioenergy plantings in the southern USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 146-155.
    3. Langholtz, Matthew & Carter, Douglas R. & Rockwood, Donald L. & Alavalapati, Janaki R.R. & Green, Alex, 2005. "Effect of dendroremediation incentives on the profitability of short-rotation woody cropping of Eucalyptus grandis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 806-817, August.
    4. Gregg Marland, 2010. "Accounting for Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Bioenergy Systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(6), pages 866-869, December.
    5. Robert Perlack, Robert & Eaton, Lawrence & Thurhollow, Anthony & Langholtz, Matt & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel, 2011. "US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry," MPRA Paper 89324, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    6. Yin, Runsheng & Newman, David H., 1996. "The Effect of Catastrophic Risk on Forest Investment Decisions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 186-197, September.
    7. Langholtz, Matthew & Carter, Douglas R. & Rockwood, Donald L. & Alavalapati, Janaki R.R., 2007. "The economic feasibility of reclaiming phosphate mined lands with short-rotation woody crops in Florida," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 237-249, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amare Tesfaw & Feyera Senbeta & Dawit Alemu & Ermias Teferi, 2022. "Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture Eucalyptus Plantations: A Choice Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Perlack, Robert & Eaton, Lawrence & Thurhollow, Anthony & Langholtz, Matt & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel, 2011. "US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry," MPRA Paper 89324, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    2. Patrice Loisel & Marielle Brunette & Stéphane Couture, 2020. "Insurance and Forest Rotation Decisions Under Storm Risk," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(2), pages 347-367, July.
    3. Deegen, Peter & Matolepszy, Kai, 2015. "Economic balancing of forest management under storm risk, the case of the Ore Mountains (Germany)," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13.
    4. Zhong, Yuan & Chen, Rui & Rojas-Sossa, Juan-Pablo & Isaguirre, Christine & Mashburn, Austin & Marsh, Terence & Liu, Yan & Liao, Wei, 2020. "Anaerobic co-digestion of energy crop and agricultural wastes to prepare uniform-format cellulosic feedstock for biorefining," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1358-1370.
    5. Rakotoarison, Hanitra & Loisel, Patrice, 2016. "The Faustmann model under storm risk and price uncertainty: A case study of European beech in Northwestern France," MPRA Paper 85114, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Liu, Shilei & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Forest harvesting restriction and forest restoration in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Xu, Ying & Amacher, Gregory S. & Sullivan, Jay, 2016. "Optimal forest management with sequential disturbances," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 106-122.
    8. Aui, Alvina & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Post-RFS supports for cellulosic ethanol: Evaluation of economic and environmental impacts of alternative policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Patrice Loisel & Marielle Brunette & Stéphane Couture, 2022. "Ambiguity, value of information and forest rotation decision under storm risk," Working Papers of BETA 2022-26, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    10. Chang, Sun Joseph & Zhang, Fan, 2023. "Active timber management by outsourcing stumpage price uncertainty with the American put option," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. , & ,, 2014. "Stochastic stability in monotone economies," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(2), May.
    12. Susaeta, Andres, 2018. "On Pressler’s indicator rate formula under the generalized Reed model," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 32-37.
    13. Lien, G. & Stordal, S. & Hardaker, J.B. & Asheim, L.J., 2007. "Risk aversion and optimal forest replanting: A stochastic efficiency study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1584-1592, September.
    14. Omoyemeh J. Ile & Hanna McCormick & Sheila Skrabacz & Shamik Bhattacharya & Maricar Aguilos & Henrique D. R. Carvalho & Joshua Idassi & Justin Baker & Joshua L. Heitman & John S. King, 2022. "Integrating Short Rotation Woody Crops into Conventional Agricultural Practices in the Southeastern United States: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Perdue, James H. & Stanturf, John A. & Young, Timothy M. & Huang, Xia & Dougherty, Derek & Pigott, Michael & Guo, Zhimei, 2017. "Profitability potential for Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) short-rotation bioenergy plantings in the southern USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 146-155.
    16. Kurtze, Christiane & Springer, Katrin, 1999. "Modelling the economic impact of global warming in a general equilibrium framework," Kiel Working Papers 922, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    17. Tsur, Yacov & Zemel, Amos, 2002. "Endangered Aquifers: Groundwater Management Under Threats Of Catastrophic Events," Discussion Papers 14993, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    18. Lan, Kai & Ou, Longwen & Park, Sunkyu & Kelley, Stephen S. & English, Burton C. & Yu, T. Edward & Larson, James & Yao, Yuan, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of decentralized preprocessing systems for fast pyrolysis biorefineries with blended feedstocks in the southeastern United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. Gregory S. Amacher & Arun S. Malik & Robert G. Haight, 2005. "Not Getting Burned: The Importance of Fire Prevention in Forest Management," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 81(2).
    20. Sauter, Philipp & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2015. "Forestry harvesting decisions in contrast to theory? Evidence from an economic experiment," 2015 Conference (59th), February 10-13, 2015, Rotorua, New Zealand 202579, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:97:y:2018:i:c:p:210-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.