IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v148y2023ics1389934123000138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development pathways for co-management in the Sundarban mangrove forest: A multiple stakeholder perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Begum, Flora
  • de Bruyn, Lisa Lobry
  • Kristiansen, Paul
  • Islam, Mohammad Amirul

Abstract

The emergence of co-management, where various government and non-government actors work together, is one of the most important governance mechanisms for natural resource management. However, local stakeholders' understanding of forest co-management has thus far been poorly appreciated. This study examined stakeholders' views on the forest co-management system of the Sundarban mangrove forest in Bangladesh. Four villages in the Chandpai range of the Sundarban mangrove forest were selected for the study. Primary data were collected through key informant interviews with multiple stakeholder levels, and focus group discussions with men and women either involved in forest co-management or not. Thematic coding and content analysis of the qualitative data was used to analyse stakeholders' views on key forest co-management activities and practices: forest protection, monitoring, meeting role, training and organisational support. These co-management activities are largely implemented through local stakeholders who are members of a number of institutions: the Village Conservation Forum (VCF), the People's Forum (PF) and the Community Patrol Group (CPG) at the local level, and the Co-management Committee (CMC) at the higher level, in which local, district and national stakeholders are involved. Stakeholders reported both positive and negative views on these co-management activities. While the positive views were mostly related to the benefits obtained from forest co-management practices (e.g., increased knowledge, awareness and ability to obtain entry permits), the negative views were related to the obstacles frequently faced by the local stakeholders, such as limited harvesting opportunities, poor meeting support and strict rules on eligibility for VCF/PF membership. The findings indicated that while stakeholders' views of forest co-management activities were mixed, it did identify the types of existing co-management benefits, problems and challenges of the local people and showed where they differed. Furthermore, this study identified particular ways to strengthen the co-management activities from the local people's perspective, which would enable their participation in the co-management system of the Sundarban mangrove forest.

Suggested Citation

  • Begum, Flora & de Bruyn, Lisa Lobry & Kristiansen, Paul & Islam, Mohammad Amirul, 2023. "Development pathways for co-management in the Sundarban mangrove forest: A multiple stakeholder perspective," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:148:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123000138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934123000138
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasz Kusio & Mariantonietta Fiore, 2022. "Which Stakeholders’ Sector Matters in Rural Development? That Is the Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Bockstael, Erika & Bahia, Natália C.F. & Seixas, Cristiana S. & Berkes, Fikret, 2016. "Participation in protected area management planning in coastal Brazil," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Columba Martínez-Espinosa & Pieter Wolfs & Katherine Vande Velde & Behara Satyanarayana & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Jean Huge, 2020. "Call for a collaborative management at Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia: An assessment from local stakeholders’ view point," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/298679, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Catherine E. Lovelock & Donald R. Cahoon & Daniel A. Friess & Glenn R. Guntenspergen & Ken W. Krauss & Ruth Reef & Kerrylee Rogers & Megan L. Saunders & Frida Sidik & Andrew Swales & Neil Saintilan & , 2015. "The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise," Nature, Nature, vol. 526(7574), pages 559-563, October.
    5. Arts, Bas & Behagel, Jelle & Turnhout, Esther & de Koning, Jessica & van Bommel, Séverine, 2014. "A practice based approach to forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 4-11.
    6. Agarwal, Bina, 2001. "Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1623-1648, October.
    7. Jean Huge & Katherine Vande Velde & Francisco Javier Benitez Capistros & Jan Harold Japay & Behara Satyanarayana & Mohammad Nazrin Ishak & Melissa Quispe Zuniga & Bin Husain Mohd Lokman & Sulong Ibrah, 2016. "Mapping discourses using Q methodology in Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/246478, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Henri‐Noël Bouda & Patrice Savadogo & Daniel Tiveau & Boureima Ouedraogo, 2011. "State, forest and community: challenges of democratically decentralizing forest management in the Centre‐West Region of Burkina Faso," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 275-288, July.
    9. Soliku, Ophelia & Schraml, Ulrich, 2020. "Protected areas management: A comparison of perceived outcomes associated with different co-management types," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Mahabub Hossain & Manik Lal Bose, 2004. "Nature and Impact of Women’s Participation in Economic Activities in Rural Bangladesh: Insights from Household Surveys," CPD Working Paper 41, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    11. Md. Nazrul Islam & Nabila Hasan Dana & Khandkar-Siddikur Rahman & Md. Tanvir Hossain & Moin Uddin Ahmed & Abdulla Sadig, 2020. "Nypa fruticans Wurmb leaf collection as a livelihoods strategy: a case study in the Sundarbans Impact Zone of Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5553-5570, August.
    12. David Christian Rose, 2014. "Five ways to enhance the impact of climate science," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 522-524, July.
    13. Heather Tallis & Jane Lubchenco, 2014. "Working together: A call for inclusive conservation," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7525), pages 27-28, November.
    14. Rahman, Md Saifur & Miah, Sohag & Giessen, Lukas, 2018. "A new model of development coalition building: USAID achieving legitimate access and dominant information in Bangladesh’s forest policy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 248-261.
    15. Mawa, Christopher & Babweteera, Fred & Tumusiime, David Mwesigye, 2022. "Livelihood outcomes after two decades of co-managing a state forest in Uganda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    16. Matose, Frank, 2006. "Co-management options for reserved forests in Zimbabwe and beyond: Policy implications of forest management strategies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 363-374, June.
    17. Mohammad Abdullah, Abu Nasar & Stacey, Natasha & Garnett, Stephen T. & Myers, Bronwyn, 2016. "Economic dependence on mangrove forest resources for livelihoods in the Sundarbans, Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 15-24.
    18. Kibria, Abu S.M.G. & Costanza, Robert & Groves, Colin & Behie, Alison M., 2018. "The interactions between livelihood capitals and access of local communities to the forest provisioning services of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 41-49.
    19. Katherine Vande Velde & Jean Huge & Daniel D.A. Friess & Nico Koedam & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2019. "Stakeholder discourses on urban mangrove conservation and management," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/289122, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Anjan Kumer Dev Roy & Jeff Gow, 2015. "Attitudes towards current and alternative management of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh to achieve sustainability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 213-228, February.
    21. Sandstrom, Camilla & Widmark, Camilla, 2007. "Stakeholders' perceptions of consultations as tools for co-management -- A case study of the forestry and reindeer herding sectors in northern Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1-2), pages 25-35, December.
    22. Islam, Kazi Nazrul & Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur & Jashimuddin, Mohammed & Hossain, Mohammad Mosharraf & Islam, Kamrul & Faroque, Mohiuddin Al, 2019. "Analyzing multi-temporal satellite imagery and stakeholders' perceptions to have an insight into how forest co-management is changing the protected area landscapes in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 70-80.
    23. Kovács, Eszter & Mile, Orsolya & Fabók, Veronika & Margóczi, Katalin & Kalóczkai, Ágnes & Kasza, Veronika & Nagyné Grecs, Anita & Bankovics, András & Mihók, Barbara, 2021. "Fostering adaptive co-management with stakeholder participation in the surroundings of soda pans in Kiskunság, Hungary – An assessment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kibria, Abu SMG & Costanza, Robert & Soto, José R, 2022. "Modeling the complex associations of human wellbeing dimensions in a coupled human-natural system: In contexts of marginalized communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    2. Ullah, S M Asik & Tani, Masakazu & Tsuchiya, Jun & Rahman, M.Abiar & Moriyama, Masao, 2022. "Impact of protected areas and co-management on forest cover: A case study from Teknaf Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Islam, Kazi Nazrul & Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur & Jashimuddin, Mohammed & Hossain, Mohammad Mosharraf & Islam, Kamrul & Faroque, Mohiuddin Al, 2019. "Analyzing multi-temporal satellite imagery and stakeholders' perceptions to have an insight into how forest co-management is changing the protected area landscapes in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 70-80.
    4. Akbar Hossain Kanan & Francesco Pirotti & Mauro Masiero & Md Masudur Rahman, 2023. "Mapping inundation from sea level rise and its interaction with land cover in the Sundarbans mangrove forest," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Lucungu, Prince Baraka & Dhital, Narayan & Asselin, Hugo & Kibambe, Jean-Paul & Ngabinzeke, Jean Semeki & Khasa, Damase P., 2022. "Local perception and attitude toward community forest concessions in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Columba Martínez-Espinosa & Pieter Wolfs & Katherine Vande Velde & Behara Satyanarayana & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Jean Huge, 2020. "Call for a collaborative management at Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia: An assessment from local stakeholders’ view point," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/298679, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Ngigi, Marther W. & Okello, Julius J., 2013. "Gender differentiated motivation for coastal forest conservation: the case of Lower Tana River Forest," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 161467, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    8. Buckwell, Andrew & Fleming, Christopher & Muurmans, Maggie & Smart, James C.R. & Ware, Dan & Mackey, Brendan, 2020. "Revealing the dominant discourses of stakeholders towards natural resource management in Port Resolution, Vanuatu, using Q-method," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Jones, Nikoleta & Filos, Elias & Fates, Eleftherios & Dimitrakopoulos, Panayiotis G., 2015. "Exploring perceptions on participatory management of NATURA 2000 forest sites in Greece," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Khan, Md Faisal Abedin & Uddin, Md Sazib & Giessen, Lukas, 2021. "Microcredit expansion and informal donor interests: Experiences from local NGOs in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    11. Fischer, Richard & Lippe, Melvin & Dolom, Priscilla & Kalaba, Felix Kanungwe & Tamayo, Fabian & Torres, Bolier, 2023. "Effectiveness of policy instrument mixes for forest conservation in the tropics – Stakeholder perceptions from Ecuador, the Philippines and Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Friman, Jenny, 2020. "Gendered woodcutting practices and institutional bricolage processes – The case of woodcutting permits in Burkina Faso," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Roy, Anjan Kumer Dev & Alam, Khorshed & Gow, Jeff, 2012. "A review of the role of property rights and forest policies in the management of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 46-53.
    14. Lauren Pandolfelli & Ruth Meinzen-Dick & Stephan Dohrn, 2008. "Gender and collective action: motivations, effectiveness and impact," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 1-11.
    15. Arts, Bas & de Koning, Jessica, 2017. "Community Forest Management: An Assessment and Explanation of its Performance Through QCA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 315-325.
    16. Pandit, Ram & Bevilacqua, Eddie, 2011. "Forest users and environmental impacts of community forestry in the hills of Nepal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 345-352, June.
    17. Alkire, Sabina & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Peterman, Amber & Quisumbing, Agnes & Seymour, Greg & Vaz, Ana, 2013. "The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 71-91.
    18. Jirawat Panpeng & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad, 2017. "Vulnerability of Fishing Communities from Sea-Level Change: A Study of Laemsing District in Chanthaburi Province, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Chapman, Mollie & Satterfield, Terre & Chan, Kai M.A., 2019. "When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 464-475.
    20. Blunch, Niels-Hugo & Das, Maitreyi Bordia, 2007. "Changing norms about gender inequality in education : evidence from Bangladesh," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4404, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:148:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123000138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.