IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v13y2011i5p361-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contexts and concepts of forest planning in a diverse and contradictory world

Author

Listed:
  • Mermet, Laurent
  • Farcy, Christine

Abstract

Forest planning is both a crucial and a microscopic field of education and research: crucial because it is hard to conceive of any forest management without long term planning and microscopic because only very limited manpower and resources are devoted to this field. The necessity of forest planning and the challenge to it are composed by rapid evolutions both in the way societies view forests and in technological and economic pressures on them. The paper proposes to review contemporary issues in the field of forest planning education and research. The "comfort zone" of classical approaches -- techno-economic approaches concentrating on maximizing fluxes in the forest -- is challenged in three directions. First, the foundations of forest planning are increasingly spread across different disciplinary fields. Second, the list of issues encompassed is rapidly expanding, for instance to risk analysis, public participation, biodiversity, new technologies and uses of wood, climate change, etc. Third, forest planning has to find its relevance in very contrasted societal needs and views regarding forests. By reviewing and attempting to order the multiple combinations between these various concepts of, and expectations from, forest planning, the paper attempts to map the landscape of a rapidly diversifying field.

Suggested Citation

  • Mermet, Laurent & Farcy, Christine, 2011. "Contexts and concepts of forest planning in a diverse and contradictory world," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 361-365, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:5:p:361-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934111000244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoogstra, Marjanke A. & Schanz, Heiner & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "The future of European forestry--between urbanization and rural development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 441-445, August.
    2. M. Mazoyer & Laurence Roudart, 1997. "Histoire des agricultures du monde: Du Néolithique à la crise contemporaine," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/44782, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Kant, Shashi, 2003. "Extending the boundaries of forest economics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 39-56, January.
    4. Kennedy, James J. & Koch, Niels Elers, 2004. "Viewing and managing natural resources as human-ecosystem relationships," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 497-504, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Jönsson & Fredrik Lagergren & Benjamin Smith, 2015. "Forest management facing climate change - an ecosystem model analysis of adaptation strategies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 201-220, February.
    2. Nichiforel, Liviu & Keary, Kevin & Deuffic, Philippe & Weiss, Gerhard & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark & Winkel, Georg & Avdibegović, Mersudin & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Feliciano, Diana & Gatto, Paola & Gorriz Mi, 2018. "How private are Europe’s private forests? A comparative property rights analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 535-552.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rémy Herrera & Poeura Tetoe, 2013. "The Papua Niugini Paradox. Land property archaism and Modernity of peasant resistance ?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00786274, HAL.
    2. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 1999. "The Economics Of Agricultural Biotechnology: Historical And Analytical Framework," Working Papers 31845, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    3. Michalska Sylwia, 2016. "Family Farming in Poland and in the World – Thematic Edition of Wieś i Rolnictwo [Countryside and Agriculture] Quarterly Magazine," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 271-279, December.
    4. Elyakime, Bernard & Cabanettes, Alain, 2013. "Financial evaluation of two models for energy production in small French farm forests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 51-56.
    5. Xiangzheng Deng & Zhan Wang & Chunhong Zhao, 2016. "Economic Evolution In China Ecologically Fragile Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 552-576, July.
    6. von Detten, Roderich, 2003. "Abschied vom Nachhaltigkeitsprinzip? Forstliches Handeln im Angesicht von Unsicherheit und Sinnkrise. Ein Essay," Working Papers 37-2003, University of Freiburg, Chair of Forestry Economics and Planning.
    7. Clément, Alain, 2006. "Les lois économiques doivent-elles s’appliquer aux biens de subsistance ?," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 79.
    8. Yohann Fare & Marc Dufumier & Myriam Loloum & Fanny Miss & Alassane Pouye & Ahmat Khastalani & Adama Fall, 2017. "Analysis and Diagnosis of the Agrarian System in the Niayes Region, Northwest Senegal (West Africa)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Kohsaka, Ryo & Flitner, Michael, 2004. "Exploring forest aesthetics using forestry photo contests: case studies examining Japanese and German public preferences," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 289-299, June.
    10. Khan, M. Ali, 2016. "On a forest as a commodity and on commodification in the discipline of forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 7-17.
    11. Muñoz-Rojas, José & Nijnik, Maria & González-Puente, Marc & Cortines-García, Felipe, 2015. "Synergies and conflicts in the use of policy and planning instruments for implementing forest and woodland corridors and networks; a case study in NE Scotland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 47-64.
    12. Alain Clément, 2005. "Régulation économique et sociale et libéralisme mondial dans l'Angleterre de la première moitié du XIXe siècle : les corn laws en débat," Post-Print halshs-00138310, HAL.
    13. Andreia Saavedra Cardoso & Tiago Domingos & Manuela Raposo De Magalhães & José De Melo-Abreu & Jorge Palma, 2017. "Mapping the Lisbon Potential Foodshed in Ribatejo e Oeste: A Suitability and Yield Model for Assessing the Potential for Localized Food Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-31, November.
    14. Pierre Gasselin & Michel Vaillant & Benjamin Bathfield, 2012. "The activity system. A position paper," Post-Print hal-00742998, HAL.
    15. Anne-Catherine Dalcq & Thomas Dogot & Yves Beckers & Yves Brostaux & Eric Froidmont & Frédéric Vanwindekens & Hélène Soyeurt, 2020. "The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Sourisseau, Jean-Michel & Bonnal, Philippe & Marzin, Jacques & Losch, Bruno & Bosc, Pierre-Marie, 2015. "Znaczenie Rolnictwa Rodzinnego W Procesach Rozwoju. Wnioski I Rekomendacje," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 1(166.1).
    17. Guy Trébuil & Mahabub Hossain, 2000. "Les grands types de rizicultures en Asie du Sud-Est : transformations récentes, enjeux actuels et perspectives d'évolution," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 41(162), pages 277-299.
    18. Blicharska, Malgorzata & Angelstam, Per & Elbakidze, Marine & Axelsson, Robert & Skorupski, Maciej & Węgiel, Andrzej, 2012. "The Polish Promotional Forest Complexes: objectives, implementation and outcomes towards sustainable forest management?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-39.
    19. Bruno Dorin & Jean Charles Hourcade & Michel Benoit-Cattin, 2013. "A World without Farmers ? The Lewis Path Revisited," CIRED Working Papers hal-00866413, HAL.
    20. Valatin, Gregory & Moseley, Darren & Dandy, Norman, 2016. "Insights from behavioural economics for forest economics and environmental policy: Potential nudges to encourage woodland creation for climate change mitigation and adaptation?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 27-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:5:p:361-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.