IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v13y2011i4p284-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications for forest management of the EU Water Framework Directive's stream water quality requirements -- A modeling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Eriksson, Ljusk Ola
  • Löfgren, Stefan
  • Öhman, Karin

Abstract

The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) stipulates that measures should be taken to ensure that all lakes and streams in the EU have good ecological and chemical status, comparable to that of waters unaffected by human activities. This has profound potential implications for forestry, since operations such as harvesting and fertilization tend to reduce the quality of ground and stream water in affected catchments. The aim of this study is to assess the implications for forestry of limiting the concentrations of chemical substances reaching lakes and streams. A forest planning model with a horizon of 100Â years that includes requirements regarding water concentrations of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), methyl mercury (MeHg) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was applied to three intensively-studied sub-catchments at Balån in the boreal part of northern Sweden. Limiting maximum increases in concentrations of these substances to 10% above reference values resulted in an economic loss of ca. 20% or 35%, depending on whether the limits were applied to the whole area or to each sub-catchment individually. The results were also highly dependent on the assumptions, especially regarding the flux of MeHg. The results should be interpreted with caution as there are still major uncertainties concerning the cause and effect relationships. We also need to consider additional aspects to those addressed here, such as acidification, erosion and the biological effects of the operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Eriksson, Ljusk Ola & Löfgren, Stefan & Öhman, Karin, 2011. "Implications for forest management of the EU Water Framework Directive's stream water quality requirements -- A modeling approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 284-291, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:4:p:284-291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(11)00013-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiyong Sun & Zebo Li & Rongjia Wang & Jianfeng Zhang & Chunxia Pan & Zeyu Cai, 2019. "Conversion of Secondary Forests into Chestnut Forests Affects Soil Nutrients in Anji County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Ovando, Paola & Brouwer, Roy, 2019. "A review of economic approaches modeling the complex interactions between forest management and watershed services," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 164-176.
    3. Triviño, María & Juutinen, Artti & Mazziotta, Adriano & Miettinen, Kaisa & Podkopaev, Dmitry & Reunanen, Pasi & Mönkkönen, Mikko, 2015. "Managing a boreal forest landscape for providing timber, storing and sequestering carbon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 179-189.
    4. Miettinen, Jenni & Ollikainen, Markku & Nieminen, Tiina M. & Ukonmaanaho, Liisa & Laurén, Ari & Hynynen, Jari & Lehtonen, Mika & Valsta, Lauri, 2014. "Whole-tree harvesting with stump removal versus stem-only harvesting in peatlands when water quality, biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation matter," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 25-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:4:p:284-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.