IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v13y2011i3p171-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forestry professionalism overrides gender: A case study of nature perception in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Storch, Sabine

Abstract

Are women in the public forest services potential agents for change, as some authors have suggested? In this article, I hypothesise that professionalism conditions nature perception and overrides gender effects among foresters. Professionalism here includes expertise and exercise of control. Cultural Theory, especially the four 'nature myths' that have been adapted to it, ground the study theoretically, and data from two surveys ground the study empirically (survey of the German population (Kuckartz et al. 2006) and my own survey of German state foresters (2008)). The empirical findings support the hypothesis. Differences between foresters and the general public are bigger than between female and male foresters. Foresters, whether male or female, perceive nature as less ephemeral and less capricious than does the general public. Besides, they have a distinct cultural bias towards nature as tolerant but vulnerable to surpassing ultimate limits. Female foresters therefore do not change the profession's nature perception, at least not because of their gender. Questions that remain are: why does the percentage of women in forestry nevertheless remain low and how could change happen then?

Suggested Citation

  • Storch, Sabine, 2011. "Forestry professionalism overrides gender: A case study of nature perception in Germany," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 171-175, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:3:p:171-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(10)00150-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoogstra, Marjanke A. & Schanz, Heiner, 2008. "The future orientation of foresters: An exploratory research among Dutch foresters into the prerequisite for strategic planning in forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 220-229, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krott, Max & Giessen, Lukas, 2014. "Learning from practices — implications of the “practice based approach” for forest and environmental policy research," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 12-16.
    2. Andersson, Elias & Lidestav, Gun, 2016. "Creating alternative spaces and articulating needs: Challenging gendered notions of forestry and forest ownership through women's networks," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 38-44.
    3. Mundaca, Enrique A. & Lazzaro-Salazar, Mariana & Pujol-Cols, Lucas J. & Muñoz-Quezada, María Teresa, 2021. "The Emotional and Cognitive Scale of the Human-Nature Relationship (ECS-HNR)," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3504, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    4. Enrique A. Mundaca & Mariana Lazzaro-Salazar & Lucas Pujol-Cols & María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada, 2021. "The Emotional and Cognitive Scale of the Human–Nature Relationship (ECS-HNR)," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    5. Maria Johansson & Lisa Ringblom, 2017. "The Business Case of Gender Equality in Swedish Forestry and Mining - Restricting or Enabling Organizational Change," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 628-642, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Permadi, Dwiko B. & Yasmi, Yurdi, 2012. "The value of cultural theory for participatory processes in natural resource management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 99-106.
    2. Sotirov, Metodi & Blum, Mareike & Storch, Sabine & Selter, Andy & Schraml, Ulrich, 2017. "Do forest policy actors learn through forward-thinking? Conflict and cooperation relating to the past, present and futures of sustainable forest management in Germany," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P2), pages 256-268.
    3. Whyte, Randall & Lohmann, Gui, 2015. "The carrier-within-a-carrier strategy: An analysis of Jetstar," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 141-148.
    4. Li, Jia & Bluemling, Bettina & Mol, Arthur P. J. & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2014. "Stagnating Jatropha Biofuel Development in Southwest China: An Institutional Approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(6), pages 3192-3212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:3:p:171-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.