IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v124y2021ics1389934120307073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing economic and environmental feasibility of wood-based electricity generation in South America: A case study from Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Masum, Md Farhad Hossain
  • Dwivedi, Puneet
  • De La Torre, Rafael

Abstract

Biopower could replace traditional diesel-based electricity as a cheaper and carbon-friendly alternative in NE Colombia. Using regional yield and cost data, we analyzed the feasibility of wood-based electricity production from nine clones of eucalyptus and compared it to electricity derived from diesel in the Orinoquia region of Colombia. With our suggested silvicultural prescription, electricity from all the clones was less carbon-intensive than diesel-based electricity by at least 81%, and up to 87%, across selected clones. The unit cost of wood-based electricity was lower than diesel ($280 MWh−1). Clone 5 was the cheapest ($92 MWh−1) and least carbon-intensive (96 kg CO2e MWh−1) feedstock for electricity while the Control Clone was the most expensive ($104 MWh−1) and most carbon-intensive (139 kg CO2e MWh−1). Approximately 5000 hectares of land will be required to ensure sustainable biopower supply for a 10 MW power plant. Specific densities and calorific values of these clones played an essential role in determining the carbon intensity and the cost of generated electricity. Biopower could be promoted in the Orinoquia region with no further economic incentive. Our study will help support the bioeconomy in Colombia, which is exploring ways for boosting rural economies after the conclusion of the Peace Process.

Suggested Citation

  • Masum, Md Farhad Hossain & Dwivedi, Puneet & De La Torre, Rafael, 2021. "Assessing economic and environmental feasibility of wood-based electricity generation in South America: A case study from Colombia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:124:y:2021:i:c:s1389934120307073
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934120307073
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masum, Md Farhad Hossain & Dwivedi, Puneet & Anderson, William F., 2020. "Estimating unit production cost, carbon intensity, and carbon abatement cost of electricity generation from bioenergy feedstocks in Georgia, United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Silva, Diego & Nakata, Toshihiko, 2009. "Multi-objective assessment of rural electrification in remote areas with poverty considerations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3096-3108, August.
    3. Ramirez-Contreras, Nidia Elizabeth & Faaij, André P.C., 2018. "A review of key international biomass and bioenergy sustainability frameworks and certification systems and their application and implications in Colombia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 460-478.
    4. Huang, Ching-Hsun & Bagdon, Benjamin A., 2018. "Quantifying environmental and health benefits of using woody biomass for electricity generation in the Southwestern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 123-134.
    5. van Bueren, Martin & Vincent, David P., 2003. "Eucalyptus biomass fuels: Price competitive or way off the money?," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 58268, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Md Farhad H. Masum & Kamalakanta Sahoo & Puneet Dwivedi, 2019. "Ascertaining the Trajectory of Wood-Based Bioenergy Development in the United States Based on Current Economic, Social, and Environmental Constructs," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 169-193, October.
    7. Caspary, Georg, 2009. "Gauging the future competitiveness of renewable energy in Colombia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 443-449, May.
    8. Haghighat Mamaghani, Alireza & Avella Escandon, Sebastian Alberto & Najafi, Behzad & Shirazi, Ali & Rinaldi, Fabio, 2016. "Techno-economic feasibility of photovoltaic, wind, diesel and hybrid electrification systems for off-grid rural electrification in Colombia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 293-305.
    9. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2010. "Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1419-1427, June.
    10. Ruiz, B.J. & Rodriguez-Padilla, V., 2006. "Renewable energy sources in the Colombian energy policy, analysis and perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3684-3690, December.
    11. Henao, Felipe & Rodriguez, Yeny & Viteri, Juan Pablo & Dyner, Isaac, 2019. "Optimising the insertion of renewables in the Colombian power sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 81-92.
    12. Bridgwater, A. V. & Toft, A. J. & Brammer, J. G., 2002. "A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 181-246, September.
    13. Gonzalez-Salazar, Miguel Angel & Venturini, Mauro & Poganietz, Witold-Roger & Finkenrath, Matthias & L.V. Leal, Manoel Regis, 2017. "Combining an accelerated deployment of bioenergy and land use strategies: Review and insights for a post-conflict scenario in Colombia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 159-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azevedo, Susana Garrido & Sequeira, Tiago & Santos, Marcelo & Mendes, Luis, 2019. "Biomass-related sustainability: A review of the literature and interpretive structural modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1107-1125.
    2. López, Andrea Ruíz & Krumm, Alexandra & Schattenhofer, Lukas & Burandt, Thorsten & Montoya, Felipe Corral & Oberländer, Nora & Oei, Pao-Yu, 2020. "Solar PV generation in Colombia - A qualitative and quantitative approach to analyze the potential of solar energy market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1266-1279.
    3. Gonzalez-Salazar, Miguel Angel & Venturini, Mauro & Poganietz, Witold-Roger & Finkenrath, Matthias & Kirsten, Trevor & Acevedo, Helmer & Spina, Pier Ruggero, 2016. "Development of a technology roadmap for bioenergy exploitation including biofuels, waste-to-energy and power generation & CHP," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 338-352.
    4. Shafie, S.M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H. & Ahmad-Yazid, A., 2012. "A review on electricity generation based on biomass residue in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5879-5889.
    5. Henao, Felipe & Dyner, Isaac, 2020. "Renewables in the optimal expansion of colombian power considering the Hidroituango crisis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 612-627.
    6. Masum, Md Farhad Hossain & Dwivedi, Puneet & Anderson, William F., 2020. "Estimating unit production cost, carbon intensity, and carbon abatement cost of electricity generation from bioenergy feedstocks in Georgia, United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Gonzalez-Salazar, Miguel Angel & Venturini, Mauro & Poganietz, Witold-Roger & Finkenrath, Matthias & L.V. Leal, Manoel Regis, 2017. "Combining an accelerated deployment of bioenergy and land use strategies: Review and insights for a post-conflict scenario in Colombia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 159-177.
    8. Rúa, Diego & Castaneda, Monica & Zapata, Sebastian & Dyner, Isaac, 2020. "Simulating the efficient diffusion of photovoltaics in Bogotá: An urban metabolism approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Sam Van Holsbeeck & Mark Brown & Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava & Mohammad Reza Ghaffariyan, 2020. "A Review on the Potential of Forest Biomass for Bioenergy in Australia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Olaya, Yris & Arango-Aramburo, Santiago & Larsen, Erik R., 2016. "How capacity mechanisms drive technology choice in power generation: The case of Colombia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 563-571.
    11. Quijano H, R. & Botero B, S. & Domínguez B, J., 2012. "MODERGIS application: Integrated simulation platform to promote and develop renewable sustainable energy plans, Colombian case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5176-5187.
    12. Zapata, Sebastian & Castaneda, Monica & Franco, Carlos Jaime & Dyner, Isaac, 2019. "Clean and secure power supply: A system dynamics based appraisal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 9-21.
    13. González, Arnau & Riba, Jordi-Roger & Puig, Rita & Navarro, Pere, 2015. "Review of micro- and small-scale technologies to produce electricity and heat from Mediterranean forests׳ wood chips," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 143-155.
    14. MacCarty, Nordica A. & Bryden, Kenneth Mark, 2016. "An integrated systems model for energy services in rural developing communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 536-557.
    15. Jiaxin Lu & Weijun Wang & Yingchao Zhang & Song Cheng, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Stand-Alone Hybrid Energy System Using Entropy Weight Method Based on HOMER," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Giulio Allesina & Simone Pedrazzi, 2021. "Barriers to Success: A Technical Review on the Limits and Possible Future Roles of Small Scale Gasifiers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Liu, Liwei & Ye, Junhong & Zhao, Yufei & Zhao, Erdong, 2015. "The plight of the biomass power generation industry in China – A supply chain risk perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 680-692.
    18. Bhattacharjee, Vikram & Khan, Irfan, 2018. "A non-linear convex cost model for economic dispatch in microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 637-648.
    19. Mehrdad Massoudi & Ping Wang, 2013. "Slag Behavior in Gasifiers. Part II: Constitutive Modeling of Slag," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Holmatov, B. & Hoekstra, A.Y. & Krol, M.S., 2019. "Land, water and carbon footprints of circular bioenergy production systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 224-235.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:124:y:2021:i:c:s1389934120307073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.