IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v105y2019icp1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial incentives to perform stump treatment against Heterobasidion root rot in Norway spruce dominated forests, the case of Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Honkaniemi, Juha
  • Ahtikoski, Anssi
  • Piri, Tuula

Abstract

The financial incentives to perform stump treatment against root and butt rot caused by fungal agent Heterobasidion annosum were analyzed by simulating multiple scenarios of primary and secondary infection rates in southern and central Finland. Forest dynamics of two Norway spruce (Picea abies) dominated stands were simulated with MOTTI and Hmodel models. The results suggest stump treatment to be profitable in relatively healthy stands with high spore pressure for primary infections throughout the current risk zone for Heterobasidion in Finland. In addition, stump treatment quality has a significant effect on the profitability together with the price paid for decayed timber. For example, good quality treatment with lowest prices created a better economic outcome in many scenarios compared to inadequate quality treatment with the highest prices. To achieve the best economic outcome from stump treatment measures, monitoring systems are needed to predict spatiotemporal infection risks and the highest quality stump treatment should be applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Honkaniemi, Juha & Ahtikoski, Anssi & Piri, Tuula, 2019. "Financial incentives to perform stump treatment against Heterobasidion root rot in Norway spruce dominated forests, the case of Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934118304945
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Price, Colin, 2018. "Declining discount rate and the social cost of carbon: Forestry consequences," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 39-45.
    2. Honkaniemi, Juha & Ojansuu, Risto & Kasanen, Risto & Heliövaara, Kari, 2018. "Interaction of disturbance agents on Norway spruce: A mechanistic model of bark beetle dynamics integrated in simulation framework WINDROT," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 45-60.
    3. Simonsen, Rune & Rosvall, Ola & Gong, Peichen & Wibe, Sören, 2010. "Profitability of measures to increase forest growth," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 473-482, July.
    4. Chang, Sun Joseph & Gadow, Klaus V., 2010. "Application of the generalized Faustmann model to uneven-aged forest management," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 313-325, December.
    5. Brainard, Julii & Bateman, Ian J. & Lovett, Andrew A., 2009. "The social value of carbon sequestered in Great Britain's woodlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1257-1267, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    2. Nijnik, Maria & Pajot, Guillaume & Moffat, Andy J. & Slee, Bill, 2013. "An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climatic change," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 34-42.
    3. Tahvonen, Olli, 2016. "Economics of rotation and thinning revisited: the optimality of clearcuts versus continuous cover forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 88-94.
    4. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    5. Schägner, Jan Philipp & Brander, Luke & Maes, Joachim & Hartje, Volkmar, 2013. "Mapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 33-46.
    6. Jan Philipp Schägner & Luke Brander & Joachim Maes & Volkmar Hartje, 2012. "Mapping Ecosystem Services’ Values: Current Practice and Future Prospects," Working Papers 2012.59, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    7. Hardaker, Ashley & Pagella, Tim & Rayment, Mark, 2020. "Integrated assessment, valuation and mapping of ecosystem services and dis-services from upland land use in Wales," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    8. Mengistie Kindu & Logan Robert Bingham & José G. Borges & Susete Marques & Olha Nahorna & Jeannette Eggers & Thomas Knoke, 2022. "Opportunity Costs of In Situ Carbon Storage Derived by Multiple-Objective Stand-Level Optimization—Results from Case Studies in Portugal and Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Chang, Sun Joseph, 2018. "Forest property taxation under the generalized Faustmann formula," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 38-45.
    10. Roessiger, Joerg & Griess, Verena C. & Härtl, Fabian & Clasen, Christian & Knoke, Thomas, 2013. "How economic performance of a stand increases due to decreased failure risk associated with the admixing of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 58-69.
    11. Halbritter, Andreas & Deegen, Peter, 2011. "Economic analysis of exploitation and regeneration in plantations with problematic site productivity," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 319-334, August.
    12. Susaeta, Andres & Chang, Sun Joseph & Carter, Douglas R. & Lal, Pankaj, 2014. "Economics of carbon sequestration under fluctuating economic environment, forest management and technological changes: An application to forest stands in the southern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 47-64.
    13. Petri P. Kärenlampi, 2018. "Stationary Forestry with Human Interference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Sylvain Caurla & Antonello Lobianco, 2020. "Estimating climate service value in forestry : The case of climate information on drought for maritime pine in Southwestern France," Post-Print hal-03639335, HAL.
    15. Chang, Sun Joseph & Deegen, Peter, 2011. "Pressler's indicator rate formula as a guide for forest management," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 258-266, August.
    16. Parajuli, Rajan & Chang, Sun Joseph, 2012. "Carbon sequestration and uneven-aged management of loblolly pine stands in the Southern USA: A joint optimization approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 65-71.
    17. Maes, Joachim & Egoh, Benis & Willemen, Louise & Liquete, Camino & Vihervaara, Petteri & Schägner, Jan Philipp & Grizzetti, Bruna & Drakou, Evangelia G. & Notte, Alessandra La & Zulian, Grazia & Boura, 2012. "Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 31-39.
    18. Accastello, Cristian & Blanc, Simone & Mosso, Angela & Brun, Filippo, 2018. "Assessing the timber value: A case study in the Italian Alps," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 36-44.
    19. Sylvain Caurla & Antonello Lobianco, 2020. "Estimating climate service value in forestry : The case of climate information on drought for maritime pine in Southwestern France," Post-Print hal-02617889, HAL.
    20. Ben Abdallah, Skander & Lasserre, Pierre, 2017. "Forest land value and rotation with an alternative land use," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 118-127.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.