IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v103y2019icp90-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling policy networks: The case of Natura 2000 in Croatian forestry

Author

Listed:
  • Lovrić, Marko
  • Lovrić, Nataša
  • Schraml, Ulrich

Abstract

Natura 2000, the largest network of protected areas in the world, is the EU's approach to the protection of its habitats and species. National implementations of the directives that define it should be based on scientific argumentation but practice has showed that they are affected by stakeholders, whose power relations and different normative standpoints have led to very diverse formal and practical implementations of the Network. Croatia as the 28th EU member country has faced the same process, where a working group has been established in order to define which forest areas should be protected under Natura 2000 and which management measures should be implemented to protect forest-dependent species.

Suggested Citation

  • Lovrić, Marko & Lovrić, Nataša & Schraml, Ulrich, 2019. "Modeling policy networks: The case of Natura 2000 in Croatian forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 90-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:90-102
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934116303847
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frans N. Stokman & Jaco Berveling, 1998. "Dynamic Modeling of Policy Networks in Amsterdam," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(4), pages 577-601, October.
    2. Coen, David & Thatcher, Mark, 2008. "Network Governance and Multi-level Delegation: European Networks of Regulatory Agencies1," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 49-71, April.
    3. Noah E. Friedkin & Karen S. Cook, 1990. "Peer Group Influence," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 19(1), pages 122-143, August.
    4. Kinne, Brandon J, 2013. "Network Dynamics and the Evolution of International Cooperation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(4), pages 766-785, November.
    5. Weber, Norbert & Christophersen, Tim, 2002. "The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Metodi Sotirov & Marko Lovric & Georg Winkel, 2015. "Symbolic transformation of environmental governance: implementation of EU biodiversity policy in Bulgaria and Croatia between Europeanization and domestic politics," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 986-1004, October.
    7. Francesca Ferranti & Esther Turnhout & Raoul Beunen & Jelle Hendrik Behagel, 2014. "Shifting nature conservation approaches in Natura 2000 and the implications for the roles of stakeholders," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 1642-1657, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laudari, Hari Krishna & Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek, 2020. "A postmortem of forest policy dynamics of Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geitzenauer, Maria & Blondet, Marieke & de Koning, Jessica & Ferranti, Francesca & Sotirov, Metodi & Weiss, Gerhard & Winkel, Georg, 2017. "The challenge of financing the implementation of Natura 2000 – Empirical evidence from six European Union Member States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 3-13.
    2. Brescancin, Flavia & Dobšinská, Zuzana & De Meo, Isabella & Šálka, Jaroslav & Paletto, Alessandro, 2018. "Analysis of stakeholders' involvement in the implementation of the Natura 2000 network in Slovakia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 22-30.
    3. Alessandra Rigo & Elena Andriollo & Elena Pisani, 2022. "Intermediary Organizations in Nature Conservation Initiatives: The Case of the EU-Funded LIFE Programme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Strzelecka, Marianna & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Akhshik, Arash & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2021. "Environmental justice in Natura 2000 conservation conflicts: The case for resident empowerment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Yannis Papadopoulos, 2018. "How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 431-450, December.
    6. Carattini, Stefano & Fankhauser, Sam & Gao, Jianjian & Gennaioli, Caterina & Panzarasa, Pietro, 2023. "What does network analysis teach us about international environmental cooperation?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Eckert, Sandra, 2020. "EU agencies in banking and energy between institutional and policy centralisation," SAFE Working Paper Series 278, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    8. Fabra-Crespo, M. & Rojas-Briales, E., 2015. "Comparative analysis on the communication strategies of the forest owners' associations in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 20-30.
    9. Ana Moragues-Faus & Roberta Sonnino, 2019. "Re-assembling sustainable food cities: An exploration of translocal governance and its multiple agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 778-794, March.
    10. Maher, Imelda & Stefan, Oana, 2019. "Delegation of powers and the rule of law: Energy justice in EU energy regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 84-93.
    11. Simone Arnaldi & Alessandro Lombardo & Angela Tessarolo, 2021. "A preliminary study of science diplomacy networks in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Jacint Jordana, 2017. "Transgovernmental Networks as Regulatory Intermediaries," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 245-262, March.
    13. Metodi Sotirov & Marko Lovric & Georg Winkel, 2015. "Symbolic transformation of environmental governance: implementation of EU biodiversity policy in Bulgaria and Croatia between Europeanization and domestic politics," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 986-1004, October.
    14. Kistenkas, Frederik H. & Bouwma, Irene M., 2018. "Barriers for the ecosystem services concept in European water and nature conservation law," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 223-227.
    15. Buijs, Arjen & Kamphorst, Dana & Mattijssen, Thomas & van Dam, Rosalie & Kuindersma, Wiebren & Bouwma, Irene, 2022. "Policy discourses for reconnecting nature with society: The search for societal engagement in Dutch nature conservation policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Peris Njoroge & Amollo Ambole & Daniel Githira & George Outa, 2020. "Steering Energy Transitions through Landscape Governance: Case of Mathare Informal Settlement, Nairobi, Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Tanja A. Börzel, 2016. "From EU Governance of Crisis to Crisis of EU Governance: Regulatory Failure, Redistributive Conflict and Eurosceptic Publics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 8-31, September.
    18. Felix Rauschmayer & Sybille van den Hove & Thomas Koetz, 2009. "Participation in EU Biodiversity Governance: How Far beyond Rhetoric?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(1), pages 42-58, February.
    19. James Hollway & Jean-Frédéric Morin & Joost Pauwelyn, 2020. "Structural conditions for novelty: the introduction of new environmental clauses to the trade regime complex," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 61-83, March.
    20. Logmani, Jacqueline & Krott, Max & Lecyk, Michal Tymoteusz & Giessen, Lukas, 2017. "Customizing elements of the International Forest Regime Complex in Poland? Non-implementation of a National Forest Programme and redefined transposition of NATURA 2000 in Bialowieza Forest," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 81-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:90-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.