IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v59y2024ics1544612323010589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does mandatory tax disclosure mitigate tax expense anomaly? Evidence from FIN 48

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Huimin
  • Tao, Xuedan
  • Wang, Huabing (Barbara)
  • Zhang, Jinkang
  • Zhang, Linlin

Abstract

Financial Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) mandates the disclosure of uncertain tax positions for U.S. public firms. Exploring its impact on market efficiency, we find a reduction in the tax expense anomaly as documented by Thomas and Zhang (2011) for affected firms. The effect is stronger for affected firms with higher disclosure quality, accuracy, and transient institutional shareholding, and it cannot be explained by increased analyst tax forecasts or decreased predictability of tax expenses for future profitability. Our findings suggest that the mandatory tax disclosure under FIN 48 encourages investors to assess the implications of tax information for stock prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Huimin & Tao, Xuedan & Wang, Huabing (Barbara) & Zhang, Jinkang & Zhang, Linlin, 2024. "Does mandatory tax disclosure mitigate tax expense anomaly? Evidence from FIN 48," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:59:y:2024:i:c:s1544612323010589
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612323010589
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian J. Bushee, 2001. "Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near†Term Earnings over Long†Run Value?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 207-246, June.
    2. Hainmueller, Jens, 2012. "Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 25-46, January.
    3. Frischmann, Peter J. & Shevlin, Terry & Wilson, Ryan, 2008. "Economic consequences of increasing the conformity in accounting for uncertain tax benefits," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2-3), pages 261-278, December.
    4. Jacob Thomas & Frank X. Zhang, 2011. "Tax Expense Momentum," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 791-821, June.
    5. Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao & Liu, Chengyun, 2022. "Financial derivatives, analyst forecasts, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from an emerging market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Sonja Olhoft Rego & Ryan Wilson, 2012. "Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 775-810, June.
    7. Vikas Agarwal & Rahul Vashishtha & Mohan Venkatachalam, 2018. "Mutual Fund Transparency and Corporate Myopia," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(5), pages 1966-2003.
    8. Bok Baik & Kyonghee Kim & Richard Morton & Yongoh Roh, 2016. "Analysts’ pre-tax income forecasts and the tax expense anomaly," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 559-595, June.
    9. Sanjay Gupta & Rick C. Laux & Daniel P. Lynch, 2016. "Do Firms Use Tax Reserves to Meet Analysts’ Forecasts? Evidence from the Pre†and Post†FIN 48 Periods," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 1044-1074, September.
    10. Blouin, Jennifer & Gleason, Cristi & Mills, Lillian & Sikes, Stephanie, 2007. "What Can We Learn About Uncertain Tax Benefits From FIN 48?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 60(3), pages 521-535, September.
    11. Xu, Feng & Wan, Difang, 2015. "The impacts of institutional and individual investors on the price discovery in stock index futures market: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 221-231.
    12. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Müller, Raphael & Spengel, Christoph & Vay, Heiko, 2020. "On the determinants and effects of corporate tax transparency: Review of an emerging literature," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Lin, Shannon & Tong, Naqiong & Tucker, Alan L., 2014. "Corporate tax aggression and debt," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 227-241.
    3. Yost, Benjamin P., 2023. "Do tax-based proprietary costs discourage public listing?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).
    4. Chen, Shenglan & Ma, Hui & Teng, Haimeng & Wu, Qiang, 2022. "Banking liberalization and corporate tax planning: Evidence from natural experiments," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Samuel B. Bonsall & Brian P. Miller, 2017. "The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 608-643, June.
    6. Fangjun Wang & Shuolei Xu & Junqin Sun & Charles P. Cullinan, 2020. "Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Literature Review And Research Agenda," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 793-811, September.
    7. Michael Mayberry, 2020. "Good for managers, bad for society? Causal evidence on the association between risk‐taking incentives and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(9-10), pages 1182-1214, October.
    8. Eric R. Holzman & Nathan T. Marshall & Joseph H. Schroeder & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2021. "Is all disaggregation good for investors? Evidence from earnings announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 520-558, June.
    9. Mohammad (Vahid) Irani & Hugh Hoikwang Kim, 2023. "The consequences of non‐trading institutional investors," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(3), pages 433-481, September.
    10. Lel, Ugur & Tepe, Mete, 2021. "Investor horizon and managerial short-termism," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-20.
    11. Jennifer Blouin, 2014. "Defining and Measuring Tax Planning Aggressiveness," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(4), pages 875-900, December.
    12. Ye, Yongwei & Zeng, Lin & Tao, Yunqing & Yun, Feng, 2023. "Tax authority monitoring and corporate information disclosure quality in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Griffin, Paul A. & Hong, Hyun A. & Liu, Yun & Ryou, Ji Woo, 2021. "The dark side of CEO social capital: Evidence from real earnings management and future operating performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Cathy Xuying Cao & Chongyang Chen & Ekaterina E. Emm & Bo Han, 2022. "Corporate diversification and seasoned equity offering performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 581-614, February.
    15. Gallemore, John & Labro, Eva, 2015. "The importance of the internal information environment for tax avoidance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 149-167.
    16. James, Hui L., 2023. "Social capital and the riskiness of trade credit," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    17. Hyoseok (David) Hwang, 2023. "The real effects of local mutual funds: Evidence from corporate innovation," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 272-300, June.
    18. Clive Lennox & Petro Lisowsky & Jeffrey Pittman, 2013. "Tax Aggressiveness and Accounting Fraud," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 739-778, September.
    19. Brooks, Chris & Godfrey, Chris & Hillenbrand, Carola & Money, Kevin, 2016. "Do investors care about corporate taxes?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 218-248.
    20. Neukirchen, Daniel & Engelhardt, Nils & Krause, Miguel & Posch, Peter N., 2023. "The value of (private) investor relations during the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tax uncertainty; Tax expense anomaly; FIN 48; Uncertain tax benefits; Uncertain tax positions; Tax disclosure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:59:y:2024:i:c:s1544612323010589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.