IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v96y2024ipbs105752192400694x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External guarantees and ESG performance in China: Resource constraints or impression management?

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Yunling
  • Xu, Chengying
  • Wei, Li

Abstract

External guarantees provided by listed firms are prevalent in China, influencing firms' motivations and capabilities concerning other business strategies. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) represents a strategic imperative for companies aiming at sustainable development. Understanding how external guarantees impact ESG performance is essential for advancing the ESG agenda. This study examines the relationship between the intensity of external guarantees and ESG performance among Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2021. Our results consistently show a negative correlation between external guarantee intensity and ESG performance, impacting all ESG pillars and remaining robust through various robustness and endogeneity checks. The mechanisms underlying this impact include reduced resources, diminished stakeholder welfare, and hindered green innovation. The extent of this impact is influenced by environmental regulation, social trust, and market position while unaffected by the needs for impression management. These findings suggest that regulatory interventions in external guarantees could improve ESG outcomes, with significant implications for policymakers and corporate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Yunling & Xu, Chengying & Wei, Li, 2024. "External guarantees and ESG performance in China: Resource constraints or impression management?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pb:s105752192400694x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105752192400694X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pb:s105752192400694x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.