IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v42y2024i4p633-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability performance measurement in the food supply chain: Trade-offs, institutional pressures, and contextual factors

Author

Listed:
  • León-Bravo, Verónica
  • Caniato, Federico

Abstract

This study investigates the trade-offs that firms face in measuring their sustainability performance at different stages of the food supply chain as a result of institutional pressures. We analyzed eight firms in the Italian organic wine supply chain to map the sustainability performance measurement (SPM) indicators adopted along the environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability. We then examine how SPM is influenced by institutional pressures and the resulting trade-offs in three supply chain stages: winery, distributor, and retailer. Our findings indicate a prevalence of normative pressures from the market and from other stages in the supply chain in terms of SPM prioritization caused by institutional pressures (i.e., isomorphic) and contingent on other factors, such as the firm's size and culture. In particular, SPM trade-offs vary according to the supply chain stage, whereby wineries prioritize the environmental and economic dimensions, distributors—the economic dimension, and retailers—the social dimension. SPM adoption is also motivated by the firm's commitment to the environment and connection with the local region, over and above the perceived institutional pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • León-Bravo, Verónica & Caniato, Federico, 2024. "Sustainability performance measurement in the food supply chain: Trade-offs, institutional pressures, and contextual factors," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 633-646.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:633-646
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323000464
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:633-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.