IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v42y2024i4p515-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Out of sight – Out of trust? An analysis of the mediating role of communication frequency and quality in the relationship between workplace isolation and trust

Author

Listed:
  • van Zoonen, Ward
  • Sivunen, Anu E.
  • Blomqvist, Kirsimarja

Abstract

The current study examines how workplace isolation may erode interpersonal trust in organizations. A global pandemic with lockdown restrictions provided an almost perfect experimental setting that helped us investigate how workplace isolation among remote workers may impact trust in supervisors and coworkers through communication frequency and quality. The findings show that the negative relationship between isolation and trust is primarily established by reduced organizational communication quality and interpersonal information-sharing quality compared to the frequency of communication. Hence, the findings demonstrate that the erosion of interpersonal trust for isolated workers is qualified mainly by the extent to which isolation obstructs high-quality organizational communication and information sharing. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that trust in supervisors is particularly likely to be affected by workplace isolation compared to trust among coworkers.

Suggested Citation

  • van Zoonen, Ward & Sivunen, Anu E. & Blomqvist, Kirsimarja, 2024. "Out of sight – Out of trust? An analysis of the mediating role of communication frequency and quality in the relationship between workplace isolation and trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 515-526.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:515-526
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323000488
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:515-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.