IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v42y2024i4p503-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multilevel qualitative research: Insights from practice

Author

Listed:
  • Köhler, Tine

Abstract

In this paper, I provide insights from a multilevel, qualitative research project, focusing specifically on the rationale underlying the employed methodological choices. The purpose of this paper is to showcase, through a detailed account of one specific case, the considerations researchers conducting qualitative multilevel research may ponder in their research design. This complements the papers included in this management focus issue examining organizational research integration. The methodological choices explored in this paper can assist researchers in designing their own qualitative multilevel organizational research projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Köhler, Tine, 2024. "Multilevel qualitative research: Insights from practice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 503-514.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:503-514
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237324000410
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:503-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.