IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v41y2023i4p550-559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From a spontaneous community of practice to a piloted community of practice: A longitudinal study of resilience construction

Author

Listed:
  • Bootz, Jean-Philippe
  • Lievre, Pascal

Abstract

The article focuses on piloted communities of practice (PCoPs), which have evolved significantly in recent years in the knowledge-based economy. These social structures represent real difficulties in terms of management, particularly with regard to the possibility of reconciling two apparently contradictory logics, self-organization and control. Although recent empirical work in the literature provides a general picture of these PCoPs, they do not provide details of how this piloting is implemented over the long term. This paper uses a flexible pattern matching approach on a longitudinal case study to analyze the shift from a spontaneous community to a piloted community. The community studied here is the sound engineers of Radio France. The results highlight that piloting can only be relevant if it is presented as a reification process that makes sense to those involved. The study also emphasizes that self-organization and control can be harmonized through the creation of an ad hoc structure and that some PCoPs can be ambidextrous. In this study, we underline in which conditions the piloted community allows to maintain the resilience of an organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Bootz, Jean-Philippe & Lievre, Pascal, 2023. "From a spontaneous community of practice to a piloted community of practice: A longitudinal study of resilience construction," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 550-559.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:41:y:2023:i:4:p:550-559
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2022.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001116
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2022.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:41:y:2023:i:4:p:550-559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.